BACKGROUND: We investigated the diagnostic ability of real-time elastography to differentiate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) patients and to determine the optimum cutoff value for elastography scores for diagnosis CMM. METHODS: Twenty lymph nodes (metastatic, n = 13; reactive, n = 7) from 12 patients with CMM were examined by both elastography and B-mode ultrasound in this prospective study. Elastographic patterns were given scores of 1-5 according to the percentage of high elasticity (hard) areas in the lymph node. Elastographic patterns 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were assigned elastography scores (ES) of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. B-mode ultrasound diagnosis was performed on the basis of the morphological patterns (balloon-shaped lymph node and loss of central echoes). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, comparing with elastograms and B-mode images, with histological findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of elastography were 100, 71, and 90 %, respectively, with an ES cutoff value of 3; 92, 100, and 95 % for elastography with an ES cutoff value of 4; and 77, 57, and 70 % for B-mode ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Elastography can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for differentiating between reactive and malignant lymph nodes in CMM and might eliminate the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy. The optimum ES cutoff value for reactive versus metastatic lymph nodes is 4.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the diagnostic ability of real-time elastography to differentiate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) patients and to determine the optimum cutoff value for elastography scores for diagnosis CMM. METHODS: Twenty lymph nodes (metastatic, n = 13; reactive, n = 7) from 12 patients with CMM were examined by both elastography and B-mode ultrasound in this prospective study. Elastographic patterns were given scores of 1-5 according to the percentage of high elasticity (hard) areas in the lymph node. Elastographic patterns 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were assigned elastography scores (ES) of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. B-mode ultrasound diagnosis was performed on the basis of the morphological patterns (balloon-shaped lymph node and loss of central echoes). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, comparing with elastograms and B-mode images, with histological findings as the reference standard. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of elastography were 100, 71, and 90 %, respectively, with an ES cutoff value of 3; 92, 100, and 95 % for elastography with an ES cutoff value of 4; and 77, 57, and 70 % for B-mode ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Elastography can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for differentiating between reactive and malignant lymph nodes in CMM and might eliminate the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy. The optimum ES cutoff value for reactive versus metastatic lymph nodes is 4.
Authors: Christy Y Chai; Jonathan S Zager; Margaret M Szabunio; Suroosh S Marzban; Alec Chau; Robert M Rossi; Vernon K Sondak Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; J E Gershenwald; J F Thompson; D S Reintgen; N Cascinelli; M Urist; K M McMasters; M I Ross; J M Kirkwood; M B Atkins; J A Thompson; D G Coit; D Byrd; R Desmond; Y Zhang; P Y Liu; G H Lyman; A Morabito Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christiane Voit; Alexander C J Van Akkooi; Gregor Schäfer-Hesterberg; Alfred Schoengen; Katharina Kowalczyk; Joachim C Roewert; Wolfram Sterry; Alexander M M Eggermont Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Seau Tak Cheung; Paul Nathan; Rubeta N Matin; Naomi Chuchu; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan E Bayliss; Abha Gulati; Lopa Patel; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Manil Subesinghe; Zoe Traill; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Charlotte M C Oude Ophuis; Lisa B Koppert; Cécile de Monyé; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Senada Koljenović; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Cornelis Verhoef; Dirk J Grünhagen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 4.430