Literature DB >> 23898432

Anatomical and functional recovery of neurotized remnant rectus abdominis muscle in muscle-sparing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.

Woonhyeok Jeong1, Daegu Son, Hyeonjung Yeo, Hoijoon Jeong, Junhyung Kim, Kihwan Han, Soyoung Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps typically sacrifice the entire muscle. In our experience, the lateral strip of the rectus abdominis muscle can be spared in an attempt to maintain function and reduce morbidity. When the intercostal nerves are injured, muscle atrophy appears with time. The severed intercostal nerve was reinserted into the remnant lateral strip of the rectus abdominis muscle to reduce muscle atrophy.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 9 neurotized cases and 10 non-neurotized cases. Abdominal computed tomography was performed to determine the area of the rectus muscles. Electromyography (EMG) was performed to check contractile function of the remnant muscle. A single investigator measured the mean areas of randomly selected locations (second lumbar spine) using ImageJ software in a series of 10 cross-sectional slices. We compared the Hounsfield unit (HU) pre- and postoperatively to evaluate regeneration quality.
RESULTS: In the neurotization group, 7 of 9 cases maintained the mass of remnant muscle. However, in the non-neurotization group, 8 of 10 lost their mass. The number of totally atrophied muscles in each of the two groups was significantly different (P=0.027). All of the remnant muscles showed contractile function on EMG. The 9 remaining remnant rectus abdominis muscles showed declined the HU value after surgery but also within a normal range of muscle.
CONCLUSIONS: Neurotization was found to be effective in maintaining the mass of remnant muscle. Neurotized remnant muscle had contractile function on EMG and no fatty degeneration by HU value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; Multidetector computed tomography; Nerve transfer; Rectus abdominis

Year:  2013        PMID: 23898432      PMCID: PMC3723996          DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Plast Surg        ISSN: 2234-6163


  17 in total

1.  A two-year prospective analysis of trunk function in TRAM breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; William M Kuzon; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Abdominal wall competence in transverse abdominal island flap operations.

Authors:  C R Hartrampf
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.

Authors:  J M Serletti; S L Moran
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Long-term evaluation of the abdominal wall competence after total and selective harvesting of the rectus abdominis muscle.

Authors:  A Galli; M Adami; P Berrino; S Leone; P Santi
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Denervated human skeletal muscle: MR imaging evaluation.

Authors:  J L Fleckenstein; D Watumull; K E Conner; M Ezaki; R G Greenlee; W W Bryan; D P Chason; R W Parkey; R M Peshock; P D Purdy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Avoiding denervation of rectus abdominis in DIEP flap harvest II: an intraoperative assessment of the nerves to rectus.

Authors:  Warren M Rozen; Mark W Ashton; Birgitte J Kiil; Damien Grinsell; Sugitha Seneviratne; Russell J Corlett; G Ian Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer.

Authors:  M Lejour; M Dome
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5- to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients.

Authors:  C L Mizgala; C R Hartrampf; G K Bennett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  J C Grotting; M M Urist; W A Maddox; L O Vasconez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system.

Authors:  H K Moon; G I Taylor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Is Pregnancy Following a TRAM or DIEP Flap Safe? A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ao Fu; Chunjun Liu
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Various applications of deep temporal fascia in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Sung Wan Park; Jae Hoon Kim; Chang Yong Choi; Kyu Hwa Jung; Jin Woo Song
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Comparison of repair of peripheral nerve transection in predegenerated muscle with and without a vein graft.

Authors:  Jamshid Mohammadi; Hamdollah Delaviz; Bahram Mohammadi; Hamoun Delaviz; Parastou Rad
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.474

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.