BACKGROUND: Robots have allowed head and neck surgeons to extirpate oropharyngeal tumors safely without the need for lip-split incision or mandibulotomy. Using robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction is new but essential for oropharyngeal defects that result from robotic tumor excision. We report our experience with robotic free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects to exemplify the necessity for robotic reconstruction. METHODS: We investigated head and neck cancer patients who underwent ablation surgery and free-flap reconstruction by robot. Between July 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012, 5 cases were performed and patient demographics, location of tumor, pathologic stage, reconstruction methods, flap size, recipient vessel, necessary pedicle length, and operation time were investigated. RESULTS: Among five free-flap reconstructions, four were radial forearm free flaps and one was an anterolateral thigh free-flap. Four flaps used the superior thyroid artery and one flap used a facial artery as the recipient vessel. The average pedicle length was 8.8 cm. Flap insetting and microanastomosis were achieved using a specially manufactured robotic instrument. The total operation time was 1,041.0 minutes (range, 814 to 1,132 minutes), and complications including flap necrosis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the clinically applicable use of robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction, especially using a free flap. A robot can assist the operator in insetting the flap at a deep portion of the oropharynx without the need to perform a traditional mandibulotomy. Robot-assisted reconstruction may substitute for existing surgical methods and is accepted as the most up-to-date method.
BACKGROUND: Robots have allowed head and neck surgeons to extirpate oropharyngeal tumors safely without the need for lip-split incision or mandibulotomy. Using robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction is new but essential for oropharyngeal defects that result from robotic tumor excision. We report our experience with robotic free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects to exemplify the necessity for robotic reconstruction. METHODS: We investigated head and neck cancerpatients who underwent ablation surgery and free-flap reconstruction by robot. Between July 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012, 5 cases were performed and patient demographics, location of tumor, pathologic stage, reconstruction methods, flap size, recipient vessel, necessary pedicle length, and operation time were investigated. RESULTS: Among five free-flap reconstructions, four were radial forearm free flaps and one was an anterolateral thigh free-flap. Four flaps used the superior thyroid artery and one flap used a facial artery as the recipient vessel. The average pedicle length was 8.8 cm. Flap insetting and microanastomosis were achieved using a specially manufactured robotic instrument. The total operation time was 1,041.0 minutes (range, 814 to 1,132 minutes), and complications including flap necrosis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the clinically applicable use of robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction, especially using a free flap. A robot can assist the operator in insetting the flap at a deep portion of the oropharynx without the need to perform a traditional mandibulotomy. Robot-assisted reconstruction may substitute for existing surgical methods and is accepted as the most up-to-date method.
Entities:
Keywords:
Free tissue flaps; Head and neck neoplasms; Robotics
Authors: K Aubry; M Yachine; A-F Perez; M Vivent; J Lerat; A Scomparin; J-P Bessède Journal: Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 2.080
Authors: Agnes M Hurtuk; Anna Marcinow; Amit Agrawal; Matthew Old; Theodoros N Teknos; Enver Ozer Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Young Min Park; Won Shik Kim; Armando De Virgilio; So Yoon Lee; Jeong Hun Seol; Se-Heon Kim Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Young Min Park; F Christopher Holsinger; Won Shik Kim; Sang Chul Park; Eun Jung Lee; Eun Chang Choi; Yoon Woo Koh Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Young Min Park; Won Shik Kim; Hyung Kwon Byeon; Sei Young Lee; Se-Heon Kim Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 1.651
Authors: Vincent L Biron; Daniel A O'Connell; Brittany Barber; Jessica M Clark; Colin Andrews; Caroline C Jeffery; David W J Côté; Jeffrey Harris; Hadi Seikaly Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-03-14