Literature DB >> 23897416

Clinical outcomes following nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications.

Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz1, Cláudia Maria Aldrighi, Eduardo Montag, Eduardo Gustavo Arruda, José Mendes Aldrighi, Rolf Gemperli, Jose Roberto Filassi, Marcus Castro Ferreira.   

Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly offered to women for therapeutic and prophylactic indications. Although, clinical series have been described, there are few studies describing risk factors for complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of complications in a series of consecutive patients submitted to NSM and differences between clinical risk factors, breast volume, and different incision types. In a cohort-designed study, 158 reconstructed patients (invasive/in situ cancer and high risk for cancer) were stratified into groups based on different types of incision used (hemi-periareolar, double-circle periareolar, and Wise-pattern). They were matched for age, body mass index, associated clinical diseases, smoking, and weight of specimen. Also included were patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy. Mean follow-up was 65.6 months. In 106 (67 %) patients, NSM was performed for breast cancer treatment and in 52 (32.9 %) for cancer prophylaxis. Thirty-nine (24.6 %) patients were submitted to hemi-periareolar technique, 67 (42.4 %) to double-circle periareolar incision, and 52 (33 %) to Wise-pattern incision. The reconstruction was performed with tissue expander and implant-expander. Local recurrence rate was 3.7 % and the incidence of distant metastases was 1.8 %. Obese patients and higher weight of specimen had a higher risk for complications. After adjusting risk factors (BMI, weight of specimen), the complications were higher for patients submitted to hemi-periareolar and Wise-pattern incisions. This follow-up survey demonstrates that NSM facilitates optimal breast reconstruction by preserving the majority of the breast skin. Selected patients can have safe outcomes and therefore this may be a feasible option for breast cancer management. Success depends on coordinated planning with the oncologic surgeon and careful preoperative and intraoperative management. Surgical risk factors include incision type, obesity, and weight of breast specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23897416     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2634-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

Review 1.  Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy.

Authors:  Victorien M T van Verschuer; Marike C Maijers; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  The Landmark Series: Mastectomy Trials (Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing and Reconstruction Landmark Trials).

Authors:  Leisha C Elmore; Jill R Dietz; Terence M Myckatyn; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Radiotherapy and nipple-areolar complex necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yajuan Zheng; Miaochun Zhong; Chao Ni; Hongjun Yuan; Jingxia Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Edna Holz-Sapra; Dirk Rades; Alexander Moser; Gabriela Studer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Implant-based breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: one-stage vs. two-stage approach.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

7.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

8.  How to perform a NAC sparing mastectomy using an ADM and an implant.

Authors:  Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Mikkel Børsen-Koch; Peter Wamberg; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca S Lewis; Angela George; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

10.  Risk Factors for Complications after Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Felix J Paprottka; Christopher L Schlett; Rosalia Luketina; Karolin Paprottka; Dalius Klimas; Christine Radtke; Detlev Hebebrand
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.