Literature DB >> 23896980

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple intravenous, dose-ascending study of sirukumab in cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus.

Jacek C Szepietowski1, Surasak Nilganuwong, Anna Wozniacka, Annegret Kuhn, Filippa Nyberg, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Anders A Bengtsson, Adam Reich, Dick E de Vries, Bart van Hartingsveldt, Donald W Robinson, Robert Gordon, Benjamin Hsu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We undertook a 2-part, phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple intravenous infusions of sirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
METHODS: In part A, patients with histologically confirmed CLE were randomized to 4 infusions of placebo or 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg sirukumab every 2 weeks. In part B, SLE patients diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology criteria with a score of 5-12 on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the SLE Disease Activity Index were randomized to 4 infusions of placebo or 10 mg/kg sirukumab every 2 weeks.
RESULTS: We treated 31 CLE patients (23 with sirukumab, 8 with placebo) and 15 SLE patients (10 with sirukumab, 5 with placebo). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often with sirukumab than placebo in CLE patients (91% versus 63%) and in SLE patients (90% versus 80%). Sirukumab led to sustained, dose-independent decreases in white blood cell counts, absolute neutrophil counts (neutropenia), and platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) and to minor elevations in total cholesterol levels. The majority of infections were mild respiratory infections. which were reported similarly across CLE cohorts but more often in sirukumab-treated than in placebo-treated SLE patients. Two serious AEs of infection occurred (pneumonia in the 10 mg/kg-treated group and iatrogenic wound infection in the 4 mg/kg-treated group). Sirukumab showed linear pharmacokinetics in CLE patients. Systemic exposure and half-life were comparable between CLE and SLE patients. No patient developed antibodies to sirukumab through 22 weeks. C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A mean concentrations were suppressed with sirukumab from week 1 to week 14.
CONCLUSION: Treatment with intravenous sirukumab infusions was generally well tolerated in both CLE and SLE patients with mild, stable, active disease. Sirukumab demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied and comparable systemic exposure and half-life in CLE and SLE patients.
Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23896980     DOI: 10.1002/art.38091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  28 in total

Review 1.  Beyond pan-B-cell-directed therapy - new avenues and insights into the pathogenesis of SLE.

Authors:  Thomas Dörner; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Therapeutic options for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Joshua Chang; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 3.  IL-6 biology: implications for clinical targeting in rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Leonard H Calabrese; Stefan Rose-John
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Lupus Skin Is Primed for IL-6 Inflammatory Responses through a Keratinocyte-Mediated Autocrine Type I Interferon Loop.

Authors:  Jasmine N Stannard; Tamra J Reed; Emily Myers; Lori Lowe; Mrinal K Sarkar; Xianying Xing; Johann E Gudjonsson; J Michelle Kahlenberg
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 5.  Pathogenesis of Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cellular Perspective.

Authors:  Vaishali R Moulton; Abel Suarez-Fueyo; Esra Meidan; Hao Li; Masayuki Mizui; George C Tsokos
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 6.  Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Sue Jessop; David A Whitelaw; Matthew J Grainge; Prativa Jayasekera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-05

Review 7.  Research and therapeutics-traditional and emerging therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Laurie S Davis; Andreas M Reimold
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 8.  Drugs in early clinical development for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Mariana Postal; Nailú Angélica Sinicato; Simone Appenzeller; Timothy B Niewold
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 6.206

Review 9.  Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Amy J Petty; Lauren Floyd; Christopher Henderson; Matilda W Nicholas
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 10.  Systemic lupus erythematosus: a therapeutic challenge for the XXI century.

Authors:  Manuel F Ugarte-Gil; Graciela S Alarcón
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.