Literature DB >> 23896852

Socioeconomic status and paranoia: the role of life hassles, self-mastery, and striving to avoid inferiority.

Fraser Anderson1, Daniel Freeman.   

Abstract

Paranoid ideation is more common in the general population than previously thought, and it is associated with low socioeconomic status. Daily life hassles, self-mastery, and striving to avoid inferiority may partly account for this association, but these factors have not been examined in relation to paranoid thoughts. Two hundred fifteen individuals from the general population completed self-report assessments of paranoid thoughts during the last month, daily life hassles, self-mastery, striving to avoid inferiority, and socioeconomic classification. A greater number of daily hassles, low self-mastery, and insecure striving were all associated with greater levels of paranoid thinking. Each variable was associated with markers of socioeconomic status. This study demonstrates for the first time the association of paranoid thoughts with life hassles, self-mastery, and striving to avoid inferiority. Each of the factors examined may be a plausible candidate to account for why lower socioeconomic status is associated with greater perceptions of threat from other people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23896852     DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829c5047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  5 in total

1.  An evolutionary perspective on paranoia.

Authors:  Nichola J Raihani; Vaughan Bell
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-17

2.  Moderating Effects of Striving to Avoid Inferiority on Income and Mental Health.

Authors:  Asa Nagae; Kenichi Asano; Yasuhiro Kotera
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Proposed declassification of disease categories related to sexual orientation in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11).

Authors:  Susan D Cochran; Jack Drescher; Eszter Kismödi; Alain Giami; Claudia García-Moreno; Elham Atalla; Adele Marais; Elisabeth Meloni Vieira; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Social reward, punishment, and prosociality in paranoia.

Authors:  Nichola Raihani; Daniel Martinez-Gatell; Vaughan Bell; Lucy Foulkes
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Experimentally induced social threat increases paranoid thinking.

Authors:  Vanessa Saalfeld; Zeina Ramadan; Vaughan Bell; Nichola J Raihani
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.