Literature DB >> 23896069

Response to Weinstock and Slatin's (2012) critique of IWH-NIOSH systematic review of the effectiveness of OSH training.

Lynda S Robson1, Paul A Schulte, Benjamin C Amick, Carol M Stephenson, Emma L Irvin.   

Abstract

This commentary responds to the recent critique by Weinstock and Slatin [1] of our systematic review on the effectiveness of occupational safety and health (OSH) training conducted jointly by the Institute for Work & Health (IWH) in Canada and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the United States [2, 3]. We address misunderstandings of our perspectives on training, especially empowerment training, and the evaluation of such training.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23896069      PMCID： PMC4623575          DOI： 10.2190/NS.23.2.b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Solut        ISSN： 1048-2911


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety training.

Authors:  Lynda S Robson; Carol M Stephenson; Paul A Schulte; Benjamin C Amick; Emma L Irvin; Donald E Eggerth; Stella Chan; Amber R Bielecky; Anna M Wang; Terri L Heidotting; Robert H Peters; Judith A Clarke; Kimberley Cullen; Cathy J Rotunda; Paula L Grubb
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 2.  Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions.

Authors:  Ray Pawson; Trisha Greenhalgh; Gill Harvey; Kieran Walshe
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-07

3.  Learning to take action: the goals of health and safety training.

Authors:  Deborah Weinstock; Craig Slatin
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2012

4.  Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Geoff Wong; Gill Westhorp; Ray Pawson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.615
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.