Literature DB >> 23892419

Selective enrichment and production of highly urease active bacteria by non-sterile (open) chemostat culture.

Liang Cheng1, Ralf Cord-Ruwisch.   

Abstract

In general, bioprocesses can be subdivided into naturally occurring processes, not requiring sterility (e.g., beer brewing, wine making, lactic acid fermentation, or biogas digestion) and other processes (e.g., the production of enzymes and antibiotics) that typically require a high level of sterility to avoid contaminant microbes overgrowing the production strain. The current paper describes the sustainable, non-sterile production of an industrial enzyme using activated sludge as inoculum. By using selective conditions (high pH, high ammonia concentration, and presence of urea) for the target bacterium, highly active ureolytic bacteria, physiologically resembling Sporosarcina pasteurii were reproducibly enriched and then continuously produced via chemostat operation of the bioreactor. When using a pH of 10 and about 0.2 M urea in a yeast extract-based medium, ureolytic bacteria developed under aerobic chemostat operation at hydraulic retention times of about 10 h with urease levels of about 60 μmol min⁻¹ ml⁻¹ culture. For cost minimization at an industrial scale the costly protein-rich yeast extract medium could be replaced by commercial milk powder or by lysed activated sludge. Glutamate, molasses, or glucose-based media did not result in the enrichment of ureolytic bacteria by the chemostat. The concentration of intracellular urease was sufficiently high such that the produced raw effluent from the reactor could be used directly for biocementation in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23892419     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-013-1310-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  23 in total

1.  The mechanism of lysis of Prymnesium parvum by weak electrolytes.

Authors:  M SHILO; M SHILO
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1962-12

2.  Characterization of two urease-producing and calcifying Bacillus spp. isolated from cement.

Authors:  Varenyam Achal; Abhijit Mukherjee; M Sudhakara Reddy
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.351

3.  A bifunctional urease enhances survival of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica and Morganella morganii at low pH.

Authors:  G M Young; D Amid; V L Miller
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Urease from a potentially pathogenic coccoid isolate: purification, characterization, and comparison to other microbial ureases.

Authors:  S G Lee; D H Calhoun
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Ethanol from lignocellulose using crude unprocessed cellulase from solid-state fermentation.

Authors:  Mitchell Lever; Goen Ho; Ralf Cord-Ruwisch
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Elimination of the adverse effects of urea fertilizer on seed germination, seedling growth, and early plant growth in soil.

Authors:  J M Bremner; M J Krogmeier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ammonium toxicity in bacteria.

Authors:  Tim Müller; Britta Walter; Astrid Wirtz; Andreas Burkovski
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Organization of Ureaplasma urealyticum urease gene cluster and expression in a suppressor strain of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  O Neyrolles; S Ferris; N Behbahani; L Montagnier; A Blanchard
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Enrichment of a mixed bacterial culture with a high polyhydroxyalkanoate storage capacity.

Authors:  Katja Johnson; Yang Jiang; Robbert Kleerebezem; Gerard Muyzer; Mark C M van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Ammonium toxicity and potassium limitation in yeast.

Authors:  David C Hess; Wenyun Lu; Joshua D Rabinowitz; David Botstein
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Urease-aided calcium carbonate mineralization for engineering applications: A review.

Authors:  Barbara Krajewska
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 10.479

2.  Bioprospecting of Ureolytic Bacteria From Laguna Salada for Biomineralization Applications.

Authors:  Dayana Arias; Luis A Cisternas; Carol Miranda; Mariella Rivas
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-18

3.  Influence of Lysinibacillus sphaericus on compressive strength and water sorptivity in microbial cement mortar.

Authors:  Daniel Karanja Mutitu; Jackson Muthengia Wachira; Romano Mwirichia; Joseph Karanja Thiong'o; Onesmus Mulwa Munyao; Genson Muriithi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-11-20

4.  Investigation of Cement Prepared with Microencapsulated Microorganisms.

Authors:  Yingying Hu; Weitao Liu; Qingtao Zhang; Xiangming Hu; Xuelong Hu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-01-13

5.  Experimental Study on High-Temperature Damage Repair of Concrete by Soybean Urease Induced Carbonate Precipitation.

Authors:  Hong Wei; Yanan Fan; Lei Sun; Hongxiu Du; Renwang Liang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Research status and development of microbial induced calcium carbonate mineralization technology.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Baolei Liu; Ming Zhong; Chuan Jing; Baoyou Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.