STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort with an embedded comparison group at a single time point. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an outpatient rehabilitation protocol that includes movement symmetry biofeedback on functional and biomechanical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BACKGROUND: TKA reduces pain and improves functional ability, but many patients experience strength deficits and movement abnormalities in the operated limb, despite outpatient rehabilitation. These asymmetries increase load on the nonoperated limb, and greater asymmetry is related to worse functional outcomes. METHODS: Biomechanical and functional metrics were assessed 2 to 3 weeks prior to TKA, at discharge from outpatient physical therapy, and 6 months after TKA in 11 patients (9 men, 2 women; mean ± SD age, 61.4 ± 5.8 years; body mass index, 33.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2) who received 6 to 8 weeks of outpatient physical therapy that included specialized symmetry training. Six-month outcomes were compared to a control group, matched by age, body mass index, and sex (9 men, 2 women; mean ± SD age, 61.8 ± 5 years; body mass index, 34.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2), that did not receive specialized symmetry retraining. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients who received added symmetry training, 9 demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements that exceeded the minimal detectable change for all performance-based functional tests at 6 months post-TKA compared to pre-TKA. Six months after TKA, when walking, patients who underwent symmetry retraining had greater knee extension during midstance and had mean sagittal knee moments that were more symmetrical, biphasic, and more representative of normal knee kinetics compared to patients who did not undergo symmetry training. No patients experienced adverse events as the result of the protocol. CONCLUSION: Adding symmetry retraining to postoperative protocols is clinically viable, safe, and may have additional benefits compared to rehabilitation protocols that focus on range of motion, strength, and return to independence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort with an embedded comparison group at a single time point. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an outpatient rehabilitation protocol that includes movement symmetry biofeedback on functional and biomechanical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BACKGROUND: TKA reduces pain and improves functional ability, but many patients experience strength deficits and movement abnormalities in the operated limb, despite outpatient rehabilitation. These asymmetries increase load on the nonoperated limb, and greater asymmetry is related to worse functional outcomes. METHODS: Biomechanical and functional metrics were assessed 2 to 3 weeks prior to TKA, at discharge from outpatient physical therapy, and 6 months after TKA in 11 patients (9 men, 2 women; mean ± SD age, 61.4 ± 5.8 years; body mass index, 33.1 ± 5.4 kg/m2) who received 6 to 8 weeks of outpatient physical therapy that included specialized symmetry training. Six-month outcomes were compared to a control group, matched by age, body mass index, and sex (9 men, 2 women; mean ± SD age, 61.8 ± 5 years; body mass index, 34.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2), that did not receive specialized symmetry retraining. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients who received added symmetry training, 9 demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements that exceeded the minimal detectable change for all performance-based functional tests at 6 months post-TKA compared to pre-TKA. Six months after TKA, when walking, patients who underwent symmetry retraining had greater knee extension during midstance and had mean sagittal knee moments that were more symmetrical, biphasic, and more representative of normal knee kinetics compared to patients who did not undergo symmetry training. No patients experienced adverse events as the result of the protocol. CONCLUSION: Adding symmetry retraining to postoperative protocols is clinically viable, safe, and may have additional benefits compared to rehabilitation protocols that focus on range of motion, strength, and return to independence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.
Authors: V L Talis; A A Grishin; I A Solopova; T L Oskanyan; V E Belenky; Y P Ivanenko Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Gustavo J Almeida; Carolyn A Schroeder; Alexandra B Gil; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Sara R Piva Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Johnny G Owens; Michelle R Rauzi; Andrew Kittelson; Jeremy Graber; Michael J Bade; Julia Johnson; Dustin Nabhan Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-04
Authors: Cory L Christiansen; Michael J Bade; Bradley S Davidson; Michael R Dayton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Michael J Bade; Jesse C Christensen; Joseph A Zeni; Cory L Christiansen; Michael R Dayton; Jeri E Forster; Victor A Cheuy; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Daniel Pfeufer; Jeremy Gililland; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Kammerlander; Mike Anderson; Nicola Krähenbühl; Christopher Pelt Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Giorgio di Laura Frattura; Giuseppe Filardo; Dario Giunchi; Augusto Fusco; Stefano Zaffagnini; Christian Candrian Journal: J Orthop Date: 2018-08-24