OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PIK3CA mutational status and c-erbB2 gene amplification in a series of primary uterine serous carcinomas (USC) cell lines. To assess the efficacy of GDC-0980, a potent inhibitor of Class I PI3 kinase and mTOR kinase (TORC1/2), against primary USC harboring HER2/neu gene amplification and/or PIK3CA mutations. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two primary USC cell lines were evaluated for c-erbB2 oncogene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays and for PIK3CA gene mutations by direct DNA sequencing of exons 9 and 20. In vitro sensitivity to GDC-0980 was evaluated by flow-cytometry-based viability and proliferation assays. Downstream cellular responses to GDC-0980 were assessed by measuring phosphorylation of the 4-EBP1 protein by flow-cytometry. RESULTS: Five of 22 (22.7%) USC cell lines contained oncogenic PIK3CA mutations although 9 (40.9%) harbored c-erbB2 gene amplification by FISH. GDC-0980 caused a strong differential growth inhibition in FISH+ USC when compared with FISH- (GDC-0980 IC50 mean ± SEM = 0.29 ± 0.05 μM in FISH+ vs 1.09 ± 0.20 μM in FISH- tumors, P = .02). FISH+ USC harboring PIK3CA mutations were significantly more sensitive to GDC-0980 exposure when compared with USC cell lines harboring wild-type PIK3CA (P = .03). GDC-0980 growth-inhibition was associated with a significant and dose-dependent decline in phosphorylated 4-EBP1 levels. CONCLUSION: Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations and c-erbB2 gene amplification may represent biomarkers to identify patients harboring USC who may benefit most from the use of GDC-0980.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PIK3CA mutational status and c-erbB2 gene amplification in a series of primary uterine serous carcinomas (USC) cell lines. To assess the efficacy of GDC-0980, a potent inhibitor of Class I PI3 kinase and mTOR kinase (TORC1/2), against primary USC harboring HER2/neu gene amplification and/or PIK3CA mutations. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-two primary USC cell lines were evaluated for c-erbB2 oncogene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays and for PIK3CA gene mutations by direct DNA sequencing of exons 9 and 20. In vitro sensitivity to GDC-0980 was evaluated by flow-cytometry-based viability and proliferation assays. Downstream cellular responses to GDC-0980 were assessed by measuring phosphorylation of the 4-EBP1 protein by flow-cytometry. RESULTS: Five of 22 (22.7%) USC cell lines contained oncogenic PIK3CA mutations although 9 (40.9%) harbored c-erbB2 gene amplification by FISH. GDC-0980 caused a strong differential growth inhibition in FISH+ USC when compared with FISH- (GDC-0980 IC50 mean ± SEM = 0.29 ± 0.05 μM in FISH+ vs 1.09 ± 0.20 μM in FISH- tumors, P = .02). FISH+ USC harboring PIK3CA mutations were significantly more sensitive to GDC-0980 exposure when compared with USC cell lines harboring wild-type PIK3CA (P = .03). GDC-0980 growth-inhibition was associated with a significant and dose-dependent decline in phosphorylated 4-EBP1 levels. CONCLUSION: Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations and c-erbB2 gene amplification may represent biomarkers to identify patients harboring USC who may benefit most from the use of GDC-0980.
Authors: Jolijn W Groeneweg; Silvia F Hernandez; Virginia F Byron; Celeste M DiGloria; Hector Lopez; Vanessa Scialabba; Minji Kim; Ling Zhang; Darrell R Borger; Rosemary Tambouret; Rosemary Foster; Bo R Rueda; Whitfield B Growdon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gulden Menderes; Elena Bonazzoli; Stefania Bellone; Jonathan D Black; Salvatore Lopez; Francesca Pettinella; Alice Masserdotti; Luca Zammataro; Babak Litkouhi; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Salvatore Lopez; Carlton L Schwab; Emiliano Cocco; Stefania Bellone; Elena Bonazzoli; Diana P English; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas Rutherford; Roberto Angioli; Alessandro D Santin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: C L Schwab; S Bellone; D P English; D M Roque; S Lopez; E Cocco; R Nicoletti; I Bortolomai; E Bonazzoli; E Ratner; D-A Silasi; M Azodi; P E Schwartz; T J Rutherford; A D Santin Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Stephanie Lheureux; Carolyn McCourt; B J Rimel; Linda Duska; Gini Fleming; Helen Mackay; David Mutch; Sarah M Temkin; Jean Lynn; Elise C Kohn Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 5.304