Literature DB >> 33174010

Genomic characterization of five commonly used endometrial cancer cell lines.

Eric J Devor1, Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet1, Kristina W Thiel1, Kimberly K Leslie1.   

Abstract

Recently, the compilation of massive amounts of genetic and genomic information on a wide variety of human cancer types, collectively known as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), has revealed a wealth of descriptive classification schemes both within and between different types and sources of cancer. In endometrial cancer, TCGA analyses have produced a post hoc scheme composed of four clusters: DNA polymerase ε catalytic subunit A (POLE) ultra‑mutated (cluster 1), microsatellite instability (MSI) hypermutated (cluster 2), copy‑number low (endometrioid, cluster 3) and copy‑number high (serous‑like, cluster 4). Given that cultured cells are the pre‑clinical platform of cancer research, it was questioned how representative endometrial cancer cultured cell lines are in the context of TCGA‑driven classification scheme. To address this issue in endometrial cancer cell lines, the present study investigated five commonly used cell lines: Ishikawa, ECC‑1, Hec50co, KLE And RL95‑2. The histology, mutation profile, MutL homolog 1 promoter methylation, copy‑number variation, homologous recombination repair and microsatellite instability in each of these cell lines was assessed. The result of this characterization was that none of the cell lines fits neatly into any one of TCGA classes but are still useful models for groups of endometrial tumors. Furthermore, the contention that the ECC‑1 cell line is actually Ishikawa was addressed using additional data. It was confirmed that ECC‑1 cells likely no longer exist as ECC‑1 but that they are not exactly Ishikawa either. For this reason, ECC‑1 cells are suggested to be used in vitro but with this caveat in mind. Finally, we compiled a database of 127 endometrial cancer cell lines, including the five reported on here. The wide range of variation found in these cell lines highlights the need to further characterize these cells to select models that are more representative of the various histological and genomic aspects of endometrial cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial cancer; cell lines; genomics; The Cancer Genome Atlas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33174010      PMCID: PMC8811471          DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  48 in total

1.  A novel loss-of-function mutation in TP53 in an endometrial cancer cell line and uterine papillary serous carcinoma model.

Authors:  Zhihe Liu; Guanghua Wan; Christopher Heaphy; Marco Bisoffi; Jeffrey K Griffith; Chien-An A Hu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Establishment of eighteen clones of Ishikawa cells.

Authors:  M Nishida; K Kasahara; A Oki; T Satoh; Y Arai; T Kubo
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  A therapeutic model for advanced endometrial cancer: systemic progestin in combination with local adenoviral-mediated progesterone receptor expression.

Authors:  Donghai Dai; Lina Albitar; Tan Nguyen; Laura L Laidler; Meenakshi Singh; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer.

Authors:  Yongheng Chen; Raja Dey; Lin Chen
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Uterine serous papillary carcinomas overexpress human trophoblast-cell-surface marker (Trop-2) and are highly sensitive to immunotherapy with hRS7, a humanized anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Joyce Varughese; Emiliano Cocco; Stefania Bellone; Maria de Leon; Marta Bellone; Paola Todeschini; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas J Rutherford; Sergio Pecorelli; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Models representing type I and type II human endometrial cancers: Ishikawa H and Hec50co cells.

Authors:  Lina Albitar; Gavin Pickett; Marilee Morgan; Suzy Davies; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Ovarian cancer cell line panel (OCCP): clinical importance of in vitro morphological subtypes.

Authors:  Corine M Beaufort; Jean C A Helmijr; Anna M Piskorz; Marlous Hoogstraat; Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier; Nicolle Besselink; Muhammed Murtaza; Wilfred F J van IJcken; Anouk A J Heine; Marcel Smid; Marco J Koudijs; James D Brenton; Els M J J Berns; Jozien Helleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  CopywriteR: DNA copy number detection from off-target sequence data.

Authors:  Thomas Kuilman; Arno Velds; Kristel Kemper; Marco Ranzani; Lorenzo Bombardelli; Marlous Hoogstraat; Ekaterina Nevedomskaya; Guotai Xu; Julian de Ruiter; Martijn P Lolkema; Bauke Ylstra; Jos Jonkers; Sven Rottenberg; Lodewyk F Wessels; David J Adams; Daniel S Peeper; Oscar Krijgsman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 10.  The consequence of oncomorphic TP53 mutations in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Pavla Brachova; Kristina W Thiel; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  4 in total

1.  The IFN-γ-related long non-coding RNA signature predicts prognosis and indicates immune microenvironment infiltration in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunyan Gu; Chen Lin; Zheng Zhu; Li Hu; Fengxu Wang; Xuehai Wang; Junpu Ruan; Xinyuan Zhao; Sen Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  The BRD4 inhibitor JQ1 suppresses tumor growth by reducing c-Myc expression in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yingxin Pang; Gaigai Bai; Jing Zhao; Xuan Wei; Rui Li; Jie Li; Shunxue Hu; Lu Peng; Peishu Liu; Hongluan Mao
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 8.440

3.  Utilizing an Endogenous Progesterone Receptor Reporter Gene for Drug Screening and Mechanistic Study in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Yiyang Li; Wei Zhou; Xiangbing Meng; Sarina D Murray; Long Li; Abby Fronk; Vanessa J Lazaro-Camp; Kuo-Kuang Wen; Meng Wu; Adam Dupuy; Kimberly K Leslie; Shujie Yang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Advantages of Tyrosine Kinase Anti-Angiogenic Cediranib over Bevacizumab: Cell Cycle Abrogation and Synergy with Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jianling Bi; Garima Dixit; Yuping Zhang; Eric J Devor; Haley A Losh; Andreea M Newtson; Kristen L Coleman; Donna A Santillan; Thorsten Maretzky; Kristina W Thiel; Kimberly K Leslie
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.