BACKGROUND: Small interfering RNA (siRNA) provides a highly selective method to target mutated pathways; however, its use is complicated by specific delivery to tumor cells. The aims of the present study were to develop a novel murine model of portal vein catheterization for the chronic delivery of therapeutic agents to liver metastases, determine the benefits of local delivery of siRNA to liver metastases, and determine the utility of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) as a selective target for siRNA delivery to colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, portal vein catheterization was performed through a midline laparotomy in 2 mo-old Balb/C mice. Second, the portal venous flow distribution and catheter patency were evaluated using fluorescent-labeled microspheres. Metastatic studies were performed by splenic injection of CT26 murine colon cancer cells. Uptake of DY-547-labeled siRNA was assessed by IVIS imaging, with delivery to the metastases confirmed using fluorescent microscopy. Finally, EpCAM expression was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining of human tissue microarrays. RESULTS: Successful portal vein catheterization was confirmed by saline injection and ultrasound. Fluorescent imaging of microspheres confirmed excellent distribution and catheter patency. Portal venous injection of DY547-labeled siRNA demonstrated a high level of fluorescence throughout the liver, with siRNA also identified within the liver metastases. Also, all primary CRCs and liver metastases stained strongly for EpCAM, with no expression in normal hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Liver-directed therapy can provide the selective delivery of siRNA to CRC metastases. EpCAM expression in CRC, but not normal liver, could further selectively target hepatic metastases of epithelial origin.
BACKGROUND: Small interfering RNA (siRNA) provides a highly selective method to target mutated pathways; however, its use is complicated by specific delivery to tumor cells. The aims of the present study were to develop a novel murine model of portal vein catheterization for the chronic delivery of therapeutic agents to liver metastases, determine the benefits of local delivery of siRNA to liver metastases, and determine the utility of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) as a selective target for siRNA delivery to colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, portal vein catheterization was performed through a midline laparotomy in 2 mo-old Balb/C mice. Second, the portal venous flow distribution and catheter patency were evaluated using fluorescent-labeled microspheres. Metastatic studies were performed by splenic injection of CT26murinecolon cancer cells. Uptake of DY-547-labeled siRNA was assessed by IVIS imaging, with delivery to the metastases confirmed using fluorescent microscopy. Finally, EpCAM expression was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining of human tissue microarrays. RESULTS: Successful portal vein catheterization was confirmed by saline injection and ultrasound. Fluorescent imaging of microspheres confirmed excellent distribution and catheter patency. Portal venous injection of DY547-labeled siRNA demonstrated a high level of fluorescence throughout the liver, with siRNA also identified within the liver metastases. Also, all primary CRCs and liver metastases stained strongly for EpCAM, with no expression in normal hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Liver-directed therapy can provide the selective delivery of siRNA to CRC metastases. EpCAM expression in CRC, but not normal liver, could further selectively target hepatic metastases of epithelial origin.
Authors: A E M van der Pool; R A Damhuis; J N M Ijzermans; J H W de Wilt; A M M Eggermont; R Kranse; C Verhoef Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Chad V Pecot; George A Calin; Robert L Coleman; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Christopher P Leamon; Joseph A Reddy; Iontcho R Vlahov; Elaine Westrick; Alicia Dawson; Ryan Dorton; Marilynn Vetzel; Hari Krishna Santhapuram; Yu Wang Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mark E Davis; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Chung Hang J Choi; David Seligson; Anthony Tolcher; Christopher A Alabi; Yun Yen; Jeremy D Heidel; Antoni Ribas Journal: Nature Date: 2010-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Piero Dalerba; Scott J Dylla; In-Kyung Park; Rui Liu; Xinhao Wang; Robert W Cho; Timothy Hoey; Austin Gurney; Emina H Huang; Diane M Simeone; Andrew A Shelton; Giorgio Parmiani; Chiara Castelli; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Danny Orabi; Lucas J Osborn; Kevin Fung; William Massey; Anthony J Horak; Federico Aucejo; Ibrahim Choucair; Beckey DeLucia; Zeneng Wang; Jan Claesen; J Mark Brown Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2021-05-10