| Literature DB >> 33986195 |
Danny Orabi1,2,3,4, Lucas J Osborn1,2,3, Kevin Fung1,2, William Massey1,2,3, Anthony J Horak1,2, Federico Aucejo4, Ibrahim Choucair1,2, Beckey DeLucia1,2, Zeneng Wang1,2, Jan Claesen1,2,3, J Mark Brown1,2,3.
Abstract
Gut microbe-derived metabolites influence human physiology and disease. However, establishing mechanistic links between gut microbial metabolites and disease pathogenesis in animal models remains challenging. The major route of absorption for microbe-derived small molecules is venous drainage via the portal vein to the liver. In the event of presystemic hepatic metabolism, the route of metabolite administration becomes critical. To our knowledge, we describe here a novel portal vein cannulation technique using a s.c. implanted osmotic pump to achieve continuous portal vein infusion in mice. We first administered the microbial metabolite trimethylamine (TMA) over 4 weeks, during which increased peripheral plasma levels of TMA and its host liver-derived cometabolite, trimethylamine-N-oxide, were observed when compared with a vehicle control. Next, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (4-HPAA), a microbial metabolite that undergoes extensive presystemic hepatic metabolism, was administered intraportally to examine effects on hepatic gene expression. As expected, hepatic levels of 4-HPAA were elevated when compared with the control group while peripheral plasma 4-HPAA levels remained the same. Moreover, significant changes in the hepatic transcriptome were revealed by an unbiased RNA-Seq approach. Collectively, to our knowledge this work describes a novel method for administering gut microbe-derived metabolites via the portal vein, mimicking their physiologic delivery in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Metabolism; Microbiology; Molecular biology; Surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33986195 PMCID: PMC8262340 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.145607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JCI Insight ISSN: 2379-3708
Figure 1Stepwise illustration of portal vein cannulation procedure.
(A) Abdominal anatomy. (B) Midline incision and laparotomy, with leftward externalization of intestines and overlying duodenum. (C) Externalization of left liver lobe superiorly. (D–F) Proximal vessel loop is loose. Using a 10-0 nylon micro suture, a stitch is placed in the anterior one-fourth of the vein, 3 mm distal to the vessel loop. The needle from this stitch is placed in the anterior one-fourth of the vein 1 mm proximal to the stitch. (G) The vessel loop is pulled taught. The guide wire is used to facilitate insertion. (H) The guide wire is withdrawn. The suture ends are tied together, slightly crimping the catheter. (I) The vessel loop is loosened and cut. Each of the tails of the suture are wrapped around the catheter twice and tied to create a “Chinese finger trap” effect. (J) Two anchor stitches are placed in the mesentery of the duodenum to secure the catheter. The catheter is externalized from the left lower quadrant and anchored to the peritoneal side of the abdominal wall. (K) The abdominal wall is closed, and the catheter anchored to the inferior aspect of the closure. (L) The osmotic pump is placed in the interscapular s.c. space. The skin is closed. Reproduced with permission from the Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography ©2021. All Rights Reserved.
Figure 2Health status monitoring of mice undergoing portal vein cannulation.
Portal vein cannulation was performed using saline-filled osmotic pumps (NS) and compared with sham procedure (Sham) and single-housed (SH) controls (n = 12–14 per group). (A) Body weights and (B) food consumption were measured weekly. (C) WBC, (D) RBC, and (E) platelet counts were measured 1 week after surgery. Statistical analysis of A and B was performed using a 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test on the AUC and data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis of C–E was performed with 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **P < 0.01.
Figure 3Ultrasound imaging of catheterized portal vein.
Mice underwent ultrasound imaging 1 week after surgery (n = 3). (A) The portal vein proximal to the catheter appeared patent and nondilated, and (B) demonstrated liver-directed laminar flow on Doppler imaging. (C) The tip of the catheter was visualized within the distal portal vein (red arrow), and (D) liver-directed laminar flow was visualized around the catheter. (Orange star, liver; green arrow, portal vein; yellow arrow, hepatic artery; and blue arrow, inferior vena cava.)
Figure 4Continuous infusion of TMA — a microbial metabolite with low hepatic first-pass metabolism.
(A) Peripheral plasma levels of trimethylamine (TMA) in male C57BL/6 mice receiving TMA via intraportal catheter (n =2–3). Single-housed controls (SH), sham surgery controls (Sham), and osmotic pump normal saline controls (NS) are also shown. (B) Peripheral plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) levels in male C57BL/6 mice. (C) Peripheral plasma levels of TMA in female C57BL/6 mice (n = 2-3). SH, Sham, and NS controls are also shown. (D) Peripheral plasma TMAO levels in female C57BL/6 mice.
Figure 5Continuous infusion of 4-HPAA — a microbial metabolite with high first-pass metabolism.
(A) Osmotic pumps were filled with either normal saline (NS) or 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (4-HPAA). (B) Volume of either normal saline or 4-HPAA dispensed from the osmotic pumps after 2 weeks of continuous intraportal infusion (n = 4–6). (C) A larger proportion of the 4-HPAA pool circulates in a glucuronidated/sulfated (Glu/Sul) form, reaching 10-fold higher total peripheral plasma 4-HPAA concentrations compared with the free 4-HPAA pool. (D) Significantly more 4-HPAA is detected in the liver (free + Glu/Sul), the last anatomic location where differential abundance of 4-HPAA is observed resulting from high first-pass hepatic metabolism of 4-HPAA. P values were calculated using an unpaired 2-tailed t test. *P < 0.05.
Figure 6Continuous portal infusion of 4-HPAA changes the hepatic transcriptional landscape.
(A) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of RNA-Seq transcriptome data representing the hepatic gene expression signature of the top 500 differentially expressed transcripts between 4-HPAA–treated mice (green) relative to normal saline control mice (black) as sorted by log2 fold change. NMDS was performed using DESeq2 normalized counts. (B) Heatmap of hierarchically clustered differentially expressed genes arranged by adjusted P value and log2 fold change. The z score normalized values scaled by row. (C) Volcano plot of RNA-Seq transcriptome data representing hepatic gene expression signature of 4-HPAA–treated mice relative to normal saline control mice. Genes highlighted in red correspond to those that are significantly differentially expressed (adjusted P < 0.001) with a log2 fold change > 1.5. (D) Gene ontology assignments of the top 100 differentially expressed genes as sorted by adjusted P value. n = 4 per group for all RNA-Seq analyses.