Literature DB >> 23889769

Correlation between visual acuity and interface reflectivity measured by pentacam following DSAEK.

Sonja Heinzelmann1, Daniel Böhringer, Philip C Maier, Thomas Reinhard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is an advanced method of lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. In comparison with penetrating keratoplasty, visual rehabilitation seems to be faster. Final visual outcome of DSAEK, however, seems to be limited, especially in comparison with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DSAEK cases without graft failure often do not show any definite correlate for the reduced optical performance. In this study, we tried to correlate visual acuity following DSAEK with interface reflectivity as measured by a rotating Scheimpflug system.
METHODS: We examined 14 eyes of 13 patients with the pentacam for 2-11 months following DSAEK. Reflectivity of the interface region in the centre of the optical axis as well as central corneal thickness was determined. Statistical correlation between interface reflectivity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness and follow-up time was drawn (multifactorial linear regression analysis).
RESULTS: Statistically significant correlation between interface reflectivity and BSCVA as well as follow-up time was found. Reflectivity was highest in regions of interface (metal) particles. There was no statistically significant correlation between interface reflectivity and central corneal thickness.
CONCLUSION: We present a measurable correlate for reduced visual outcome following DSAEK despite a clear graft. Inverse correlation between interface reflectivity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) indicates that irregularities or scarring in the interface region may influence the optical quality following DSAEK.
© 2013 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DSAEK; cornea; interface; lamellar keratoplasty; pentacam

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23889769     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; D Böhringer; P Eberwein; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Long-term follow-up of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Sharita R Siregar; Abdelsattar Farrag; Hla Myint Htoon; Donald Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Perforating keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the partner eye: Functional results and patient satisfaction].

Authors:  N J Gross; D Böhringer; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Graft dislocation and graft failure following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using precut tissue: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Effect of Intraocular Forward Scattering and Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations on Visual Acuity after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Hitomi Asato; Kimiya Shimizu; Hidenaga Kobashi; Akihito Igarashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Etiopathogenesis and therapy of epithelial ingrowth after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Semeraro; Attilio Di Salvatore; Alessandro Bova; Eliana Forbice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of interface reflectivity and corneal aberrations following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Hamid Khakshour; Malihe Nikandish; Maryam Salehi; Haleh Ghooshkhanehei; Amirhosein Vejdani
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 May-Aug

8.  Indications for intraoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography in corneal surgery.

Authors:  Stefan J Lang; Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Identification of the preoperative and perioperative factors that predict postoperative endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dimitri Chaussard; Florian Bloch; Arpiné Ardzivian Elnar; Yinka Zevering; Jean-Charles Vermion; Rémi Moskwa; Jean-Marc Perone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy: anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Eleonora Favuzza; Ruggero Tartaro; Massimo Busin; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.