Literature DB >> 29737416

Long-term follow-up of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Matthias Fuest1,2, Sharita R Siregar3,4, Abdelsattar Farrag3, Hla Myint Htoon1,5, Donald Tan1,3,5,6, Jodhbir S Mehta7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe the long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) performed after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in cases of infection and residual stromal opacity.
METHODS: Ten eyes of nine consecutive patients undergoing DALK after DSAEK at a single tertiary referral center (SNEC) from 2011 to 2016 were analyzed for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, spherical equivalent (SE) and cylinder, as well as graft diameters, survival, and complications.
RESULTS: The mean pre-DSAEK BSCVA was 1.73 ± 0.76 LogMAR. At a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 7.1 months, visual acuity had improved significantly (p = 0.028) to 1.09 ± 0.55 LogMAR after DSAEK. DALK was performed at 10.3 ± 7.2 months after DSAEK because of residual stromal scarring in nine and a corneal infection in one case. At the last follow-up visit (19.4 ± 13.9 months) after DALK, BSCVA had improved to 0.38 ± 0.6 LogMAR, significantly better than after DSAEK alone (p = 0.015) and before DSAEK (p = 0.018). Spherical equivalent (- 4.8 ± 3.5 D) and cylinder (- 2.5 ± 2.0 D) did not show significant changes compared to after DSAEK (SE p = 0.17; cylinder p = 0.19) or 3 months after DALK (SE p = 0.17; cylinder p = 0.46). One endothelial graft failed 3 months after DALK. Kaplan-Meier estimated average survival for all cases was 45.3 (95% CI 36.6-54.0) months. The cumulative survival probability for the entire cohort was 90% at 1, 2, and 4 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: DALK surgery after DSAEK can improve vision in cases of residual host scarring and treat host corneal infection, while avoiding open-sky surgery and sparing a healthy endothelial graft.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Treatment surgery; Vision; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29737416     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-3997-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

1.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Fiona Lim; Hla M Htoon; Donald Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Li; Mark A Terry; Jeffrey Goshe; David Davis-Boozer; Neda Shamie
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  The suitability of corneas stored by organ culture for penetrating keratoplasty and influence of donor and recipient factors on 5-year graft survival.

Authors:  W John Armitage; Mark N A Jones; Isaac Zambrano; Fiona Carley; Derek M Tole
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comparison of a donor insertion device to sheets glide in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: 3-year outcomes.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Lasitha Saroj; Hla-Myint Htoon; Siehyean Kiew; Jodhbir S Mehta; Donald Tan
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus.

Authors:  Miriam Keane; Douglas Coster; Mohammed Ziaei; Keryn Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-22

6.  Confocal microscopy after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Alfonso Savastano; Sandro Sbordone; Valerio Piccirillo; Renato Forte; Luigi Tamburini; Maria Cristina Savastano; Silvio Savastano
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Penny McAllum; Allan Slomovic; David Rootman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Bullous keratopathy as a progressive disease: evidence from clinical and laboratory imaging studies.

Authors:  Naoyuki Morishige; Koh-Hei Sonoda
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Post-DSAEK optical changes: a comprehensive prospective analysis on the role of ocular wavefront aberrations, haze, and corneal thickness.

Authors:  Holly B Hindman; Krystel R Huxlin; Seth M Pantanelli; Christine L Callan; Ramkumar Sabesan; Steven S T Ching; Brooke E Miller; Tim Martin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Confocal microscopy findings in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty performed after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Audrey Pang; Karim Mohamed-Noriega; Anita S Chan; Jodbhir S Mehta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.