Literature DB >> 23889171

Waveform difference between skin conductance and skin potential responses in relation to electrical and evaporative properties of skin.

Christian Tronstad1, Håvard Kalvøy, Sverre Grimnes, Ørjan G Martinsen.   

Abstract

The shapes of skin conductance (SC) and skin potential (SP) responses are often similar, but can also be very different due to an unexplained cause. Using a new method to measure SC and SP simultaneously at the same electrode, this difference was investigated in a new way by comparing their temporal peak differences. SC, SP, skin susceptance (SS), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were recorded from 40 participants during relaxation and stress. The SP response could peak anywhere between the onset of an SC response to some time after the peak of an SC response. This peak time difference was associated with the magnitude of the SCR, the hydration of the skin, and the filling of the sweat ducts. Interpretation of the results in light of existing biophysical theories suggests that this peak difference may indicate the hydraulic capacity state of the sweat ducts at the time of a response.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDA; Electrodermal activity; SCR; SPR; Skin conductance; Skin potential

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23889171     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

1.  The microfluidics of the eccrine sweat gland, including biomarker partitioning, transport, and biosensing implications.

Authors:  Z Sonner; E Wilder; J Heikenfeld; G Kasting; F Beyette; D Swaile; F Sherman; J Joyce; J Hagen; N Kelley-Loughnane; R Naik
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Simultaneous measurement of electrodermal activity components correlated with age-related differences.

Authors:  Dindar S Bari; Haval Y Yacoob Aldosky; Ørjan G Martinsen
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  Psychological Correlates of Nonspecific Electrodermal Responses.

Authors:  Dindar S Bari
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2019-12-26

4.  Emotion Recognition Based on Skin Potential Signals with a Portable Wireless Device.

Authors:  Shuhao Chen; Ke Jiang; Haoji Hu; Haoze Kuang; Jianyi Yang; Jikui Luo; Xinhua Chen; Yubo Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  A Circuit for Simultaneous Measurements of Skin Electrical Conductance, Susceptance, and Potential.

Authors:  Ørjan G Martinsen; Håvard Kalvøy; Dindar S Bari; Christian Tronstad
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2019-12-31

6.  Electrodermal Activity Responses for Quantitative Assessment of Felt Pain.

Authors:  Dindar S Bari; Haval Y Yacoob Aldosky; Christian Tronstad; Håvard Kalvøy; Ørjan G Martinsen
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2018-12-19

7.  Physiological characterization of electrodermal activity enables scalable near real-time autonomic nervous system activation inference.

Authors:  Rafiul Amin; Rose T Faghih
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 8.  Innovations in Electrodermal Activity Data Collection and Signal Processing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hugo F Posada-Quintero; Ki H Chon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.