Literature DB >> 23889081

Integrating cancer patients' perspectives into treatment decisions and treatment evaluation using patient-reported outcomes--a concept paper.

J Huebner1, C Rosé, J Geissler, C H Gleiter, F J Prott, K Muenstedt, O Micke, R Muecke, J Buentzel, A Bottomley, R-D Hofheinz.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes are an important tool in clinical research. In the setting of cancer treatments, benefit of therapy is essentially characterised by improvement of survival as well as quality of life (QoL). A standardised instrument to assess QoL is the standardised QoL questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire). QoL instruments provide data on different aspects (domains) of the framework of QoL. Using these questionnaires in studies provides data on how a treatment affects QoL in a group of patients. The goal of our concept is to individualise QoL and to use validated instruments in order to integrate patients' perspectives and aims into treatment assessment, planning and control. We propose to use the domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and to ask the patient to determine which objectives besides survival are relevant for him and should be achieved by treatment. These individual goals can be used in a process of shared decision-making to choose and monitor treatment. In clinical studies, this approach would allow to recruit more patients who would most probably benefit from the therapy. In addition, supportive data could be gathered in correlation to treatment goals and actual benefits.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical study; individual patient's perspective; patient-reported outcome; quality of life; shared decision-making; treatment goals

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23889081     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  11 in total

Review 1.  Promoting Scientist-Advocate Collaborations in Cancer Research: Why and How.

Authors:  Jeannine M Salamone; Wanda Lucas; Shelley B Brundage; Jamie N Holloway; Sherri M Stahl; Nora E Carbine; Margery London; Naomi Greenwood; Rosa Goyes; Deborah Charles Chisholm; Erin Price; Roberta Carlin; Susan Winarsky; Kirsten B Baker; Julia Maues; Ayesha N Shajahan-Haq
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Barriers to shared decisions in the most serious of cancers: a qualitative study of patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the UK.

Authors:  Sue Ziebland; Alison Chapple; Julie Evans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  PRO-ONKO-selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients-a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  Heike Schmidt; Daniela Merkel; Michael Koehler; Hans-Henning Flechtner; Jörg Sigle; Bernd Klinge; Karin Jordan; Dirk Vordermark; Margarete Landenberger; Patrick Jahn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Using Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Sarah A Kelleher; Tamara J Somers; Tracie Locklear; Alexandra D Crosswell; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2016-06-16

5.  Interest in Integrative Medicine Among Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in the EvAluate-TM Study.

Authors:  Carolin C Hack; Peter A Fasching; Tanja Fehm; Johann de Waal; Mahdi Rezai; Bernd Baier; Gerold Baake; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Martin Guggenberger; Mathias Warm; Nadia Harbeck; Rachel Wuerstlein; Jörg-Uwe Deuker; Peter Dall; Barbara Richter; Grischa Wachsmann; Cosima Brucker; Jan W Siebers; Nikos Fersis; Thomas Kuhn; Christopher Wolf; Hans-Walter Vollert; Georg-Peter Breitbach; Wolfgang Janni; Robert Landthaler; Andreas Kohls; Daniela Rezek; Thomas Noesslet; Gunnar Fischer; Stefan Henschen; Thomas Praetz; Volker Heyl; Thorsten Kühn; Thomas Krauss; Christoph Thomssen; Andre Hohn; Hans Tesch; Christoph Mundhenke; Alexander Hein; Claudia Rauh; Christian M Bayer; Adib Jacob; Katja Schmidt; Erik Belleville; Peyman Hadji; Sara Y Brucker; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sherko Kümmel; Matthias W Beckmann; Daniela Paepke
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study.

Authors:  Noralie H Geessink; Yvonne Schoon; Marcel Gm Olde Rikkert; Harry van Goor
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Self-reported Improvement in Side Effects and Quality of Life With Integrative Medicine in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Carolin C Hack; Janina Hackl; Nina B M Hüttner; Hanna Langemann; Judith Schwitulla; Svenja Dietzel-Drentwett; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann; Anna-Katharin Theuser
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.

Authors:  Joshua Biber; Dominik Ose; Jenny Reese; Anna Gardiner; Julio Facelli; Joshua Spuhl; Darrel Brodke; Vivian S Lee; Rachel Hess; Howard Weeks
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 9.  Pursuing Quality in the Application of Bladder Cancer Quality of Life Research.

Authors:  N E Mohamed; F Gilbert; C T Lee; J Sfakianos; C Knauer; R Mehrazin; H Badr; D Wittmann; T Downs; D Berry; B Given; P Wiklund; G Steineck
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-04-27

Review 10.  Economic Evaluation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Oncology: Is There a Difference Compared to Conventional Medicine?

Authors:  Jutta Huebner; Franz J Prott; Ralph Muecke; Christoph Stoll; Jens Buentzel; Karsten Muenstedt; Oliver Micke
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.