Literature DB >> 23888423

Hemispheric asymmetry in discriminating faces differing for featural or configural (second-order relations) aspects.

Zaira Cattaneo1, Chiara Renzi, Silvia Bona, Lotfi B Merabet, Claus-Christian Carbon, Tomaso Vecchi.   

Abstract

The human capacity to discriminate among different faces relies on distinct parallel subprocesses, based either on the analysis of configural aspects or on the sequential analysis of the single elements of a face. A particular type of configural processing consists of considering whether two faces differ in terms of internal spacing among their features, referred to as second-order relations processing. Findings from electrophysiological, neuroimaging, and lesion studies suggest that, overall, configural processes rely more on the right hemisphere, whereas analysis of single features would involve more the left. However, results are not always consistent, and behavioral evidence for a right-hemisphere specialization in second-order relations processing is lacking. Here, we used divided visual field presentation to investigate the possible different contributions of the two hemispheres to face discrimination based on relational versus featural processing. Our data indicate a right-hemispheric specialization in relational processing of upright (but not inverted) faces. Furthermore, we provide evidence regarding the involvement of both the right and left hemispheres in the processing of faces differing for inner features, suggesting that both analytical and configural modes of processing are at play.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23888423     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0484-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing.

Authors:  R Le Grand; C J Mondloch; D Maurer; H P Brent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  B Rossion; L Dricot; A Devolder; J M Bodart; M Crommelinck; B De Gelder; R Zoontjes
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Richard Le Grand; Daphne Maurer
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.

Authors:  D Maurer; K M O'Craven; R Le Grand; C J Mondloch; M V Springer; T L Lewis; C L Grady
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Face-specific configural processing of relational information.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2006-02

6.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components.

Authors:  Evelyne Mercure; Frederic Dick; Mark H Johnson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  A feature-inversion effect: can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect?

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

9.  Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Lisa S Scott
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 10.  Mechanisms of face perception.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hemispheric asymmetry of liking for representational and abstract paintings.

Authors:  Marcos Nadal; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Spatio-temporal dynamics and laterality effects of face inversion, feature presence and configuration, and face outline.

Authors:  Ksenija Marinkovic; Maureen G Courtney; Thomas Witzel; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Development of Effective Connectivity during Own- and Other-Race Face Processing: A Granger Causality Analysis.

Authors:  Guifei Zhou; Jiangang Liu; Xiao Pan Ding; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The Fusiform Face Area Plays a Greater Role in Holistic Processing for Own-Race Faces Than Other-Race Faces.

Authors:  Guifei Zhou; Jiangang Liu; Naiqi G Xiao; Si Jia Wu; Hong Li; Kang Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.

Authors:  Hailing Wang; Enguang Chen; JingJing Li; Fanglin Ji; Yujing Lian; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Upright or inverted, entire or exploded: right-hemispheric superiority in face recognition withstands multiple spatial manipulations.

Authors:  Giulia Prete; Daniele Marzoli; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.