BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies and outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been mainly studied in middle-aged patients. With increasing lifetime expectancy, the proportion of octogenarians will substantially increase. We aimed to evaluate whether the benefit of currently recommended reperfusion strategies is maintained in octogenarians. METHODS: Reperfusion therapy and in-hospital mortality were evaluated in 1,092 octogenarians and compared with 7,984 STEMI patients <80 years old based on data from the prospective Belgian STEMI registry. RESULTS: The octogenarian STEMI group had more cardiovascular comorbidities, contained more female patients and presented more frequently with cardiac failure (Killip class >1, 40 vs. 20 %) compared with their younger counterparts (all p < 0.05). Although the rate of thrombolysis was similar (9.2 vs. 9.9 %) between both groups, a conservative approach was chosen more frequently (13.8 vs. 4.7 %), while PCI was performed less frequently (76.9 vs. 85.4 %) in octogenarians (p < 0.001). Moreover, ischemic time and door-to-needle/balloon time were longer for octogenarians. In-hospital mortality for octogenarians was 17.8 vs. 5.5 % in the younger group [adjusted OR 2.43(1.92-3.08)]. In haemodynamically stable octogenarians, PCI seemed to improve outcome compared with thrombolysis or conservative treatment (5.7 vs. 12.7 vs. 8.5 %, p = 0.09). In octogenarians with cardiac failure, in-hospital mortality was extremely high independent of the chosen reperfusion therapy (34.6 vs. 31.6 vs. 36.3 %, p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality in octogenarian STEMI patients was high and related to a high prevalence of cardiac failure. Less PCI was performed in the octogenarian group compared with the younger patients, although mortality benefit of PCI was maintained in haemodynamically stable octogenarians.
BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies and outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been mainly studied in middle-aged patients. With increasing lifetime expectancy, the proportion of octogenarians will substantially increase. We aimed to evaluate whether the benefit of currently recommended reperfusion strategies is maintained in octogenarians. METHODS: Reperfusion therapy and in-hospital mortality were evaluated in 1,092 octogenarians and compared with 7,984 STEMI patients <80 years old based on data from the prospective Belgian STEMI registry. RESULTS: The octogenarian STEMI group had more cardiovascular comorbidities, contained more female patients and presented more frequently with cardiac failure (Killip class >1, 40 vs. 20 %) compared with their younger counterparts (all p < 0.05). Although the rate of thrombolysis was similar (9.2 vs. 9.9 %) between both groups, a conservative approach was chosen more frequently (13.8 vs. 4.7 %), while PCI was performed less frequently (76.9 vs. 85.4 %) in octogenarians (p < 0.001). Moreover, ischemic time and door-to-needle/balloon time were longer for octogenarians. In-hospital mortality for octogenarians was 17.8 vs. 5.5 % in the younger group [adjusted OR 2.43(1.92-3.08)]. In haemodynamically stable octogenarians, PCI seemed to improve outcome compared with thrombolysis or conservative treatment (5.7 vs. 12.7 vs. 8.5 %, p = 0.09). In octogenarians with cardiac failure, in-hospital mortality was extremely high independent of the chosen reperfusion therapy (34.6 vs. 31.6 vs. 36.3 %, p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality in octogenarian STEMI patients was high and related to a high prevalence of cardiac failure. Less PCI was performed in the octogenarian group compared with the younger patients, although mortality benefit of PCI was maintained in haemodynamically stable octogenarians.
Authors: Frederick G Kushner; Mary Hand; Sidney C Smith; Spencer B King; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Steven R Bailey; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Donald E Casey; Lee A Green; Judith S Hochman; Alice K Jacobs; Harlan M Krumholz; Douglass A Morrison; Joseph P Ornato; David L Pearle; Eric D Peterson; Michael A Sloan; Patrick L Whitlow; David O Williams Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert W Yeh; Stephen Sidney; Malini Chandra; Michael Sorel; Joseph V Selby; Alan S Go Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S E Sheifer; S S Rathore; B J Gersh; K P Weinfurt; W J Oetgen; J A Breall; K A Schulman Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E J Lesnefsky; C F Lundergan; J M Hodgson; R Nair; J S Reiner; S W Greenhouse; R M Califf; A M Ross Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: C Michael Gibson; Yuri B Pride; Paul D Frederick; Charles V Pollack; John G Canto; Alan J Tiefenbrunn; W Douglas Weaver; Costas T Lambrew; William J French; Eric D Peterson; William J Rogers Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Karen P Alexander; L Kristin Newby; Paul W Armstrong; Christopher P Cannon; W Brian Gibler; Michael W Rich; Frans Van de Werf; Harvey D White; W Douglas Weaver; Mary D Naylor; Joel M Gore; Harlan M Krumholz; E Magnus Ohman Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Giuseppe De Luca; Maurits T Dirksen; Christian Spaulding; Henning Kelbæk; Martin Schalij; Leif Thuesen; Bas van der Hoeven; Marteen A Vink; Christoph Kaiser; Carmine Musto; Tania Chechi; Gaia Spaziani; Luis Salvador Diaz de la Llera; Vincenzo Pasceri; Emilio Di Lorenzo; Roberto Violini; Harry Suryapranata; Gregg W Stone Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Milosz Jaguszewski; Jelena-R Ghadri; Johanna Diekmann; Roxana D Bataiosu; Jens P Hellermann; Annahita Sarcon; Asim Siddique; Lukas Baumann; Barbara E Stähli; Thomas F Lüscher; Willibald Maier; Christian Templin Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: James Samir Díaz-Betancur; Juan Manuel Martínez; Juan Gabriel Zapata; Isabel Marín-Orozco Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Jens Wiebe; Helge Möllmann; Astrid Most; Oliver Dörr; Kay Weipert; Johannes Rixe; Christoph Liebetrau; Albrecht Elsässer; Stephan Achenbach; Christian Hamm; Holger Nef Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Vincent G Haver; Minke H T Hartman; Irene Mateo Leach; Erik Lipsic; Chris P Lexis; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Wiek H van Gilst; Iwan C van der Horst; Pim van der Harst Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-04-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Leor Perl; Alfonso Franzé; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Noa Golomb; Amos Levi; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Gabriel Greenberg; Abid Assali; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Ran Kornowski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-30 Impact factor: 4.241