| Literature DB >> 23887815 |
Kyle Nash1, Mike Prentice2, Jacob Hirsh2, Ian McGregor2, Michael Inzlicht2.
Abstract
Neural processes that support individual differences in attachment security and affect regulation are currently unclear. Using electroencephalography, we examined whether securely attached individuals, compared with insecure individuals, would show a muted neural response to experimentally manipulated distress. Participants completed a reaction time task that elicits error commission and the error-related negativity (ERN)-a neural signal sensitive to error-related distress-both before and after a distressing insecurity threat. Despite similar pre-threat levels, secure participants showed a stable ERN, whereas insecure participants showed a post-threat increase in ERN amplitude. These results suggest a neural mechanism that allows securely attached people to regulate distress.Entities:
Keywords: attachment; distress; error-related negativity; security
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23887815 PMCID: PMC4127024 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci ISSN: 1749-5016 Impact factor: 3.436