Literature DB >> 11374327

Oxazepam alters action monitoring.

S Johannes1, B M Wieringa, W Nager, R Dengler, T F Münte.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Oxazepam has been demonstrated to slow reaction times and increase the rate of omission errors in attentional experiments. This suggests that action monitoring might also be impaired.
OBJECTIVES: The present study used the event-related brain potential (ERP) technique to investigate this hypothesis. The P3b component to targets was taken as an indicator of the target evaluation process, and the response-locked error-related negativity (ERN) served as an indicator of action monitoring. We hypothesized that the amplitudes of ERN and P3b would be reduced as an effect of oxazepam.
METHODS: A simple "oddball" reaction time experiment was conducted in a double-blind crossover study of 30 mg oxazepam versus placebo. In order to investigate variations in attentional allocation, separate experimental runs were undertaken with target frequencies of 50% and 80%.
RESULTS: ERN and P3b amplitudes were lower in the 80% target condition than in the 50% condition. Oxazepam did not affect behavioral parameters but was associated with an ERN of lower amplitude than the placebo condition. ERN amplitude variations between target conditions remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the intake of 30 mg oxazepam did not impair behavioral performance, measures of the electrophysiological recordings show that action monitoring processes were altered. We argue that this may be related to the anxiolytic properties of the drug and may constitute an important causal factor for behavioral impairments after the intake of oxazepam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11374327     DOI: 10.1007/s002130100680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  21 in total

1.  Meditation, mindfulness and executive control: the importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring.

Authors:  Rimma Teper; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  How human electrophysiology informs psychopharmacology: from bottom-up driven processing to top-down control.

Authors:  J Leon Kenemans; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Acute tryptophan depletion in healthy males attenuates phasic cardiac slowing but does not affect electro-cortical response to negative feedback.

Authors:  Frederik M van der Veen; Gabry W Mies; Maurits W van der Molen; Elisabeth A Evers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Randomness increases self-reported anxiety and neurophysiological correlates of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Alexa M Tullett; Aaron C Kay; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired temporal interval learning following haloperidol administration.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Patrick Zirnheld; Anantha Shekhar; Stuart R Steinhauer; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  'Why should I care?' Challenging free will attenuates neural reaction to errors.

Authors:  Davide Rigoni; Gilles Pourtois; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ellen R A de Bruijn; Wouter Hulstijn; Robbert J Verkes; Gé S F Ruigt; Bernard G C Sabbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The impact of perfectionism and anxiety traits on action monitoring in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Didier L Schrijvers; Ellen R A De Bruijn; Marianne Destoop; Wouter Hulstijn; Bernard G C Sabbe
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Anxiety and error monitoring: increased error sensitivity or altered expectations?

Authors:  Rebecca J Compton; Joshua Carp; Laura Chaddock; Stephanie L Fineman; Lorna C Quandt; Jeffrey B Ratliff
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  The effects of acute abstinence from smoking and performance-based rewards on performance monitoring.

Authors:  Nicolas J Schlienz; Larry W Hawk; Keri S Rosch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.