Literature DB >> 23887564

Mechanical complications of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with trochanteric femoral nails.

Wanjun Liu1, Dongsheng Zhou, Fang Liu, Michael J Weaver, Mark S Vrahas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Trochanteric Fixation Nail System (TFN) was designed with a helical blade to improve resistance to cutout. We evaluated the incidence, modes, and predictors of failure for intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with this device.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 341 intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFN was conducted. Fractures were classified from the injury films using the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, and quality of reduction and hardware placement was evaluated on the initial postoperative films.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of mechanical complications was 20.5%. Twenty-one patients (9.4%) had excessive lateral migration of the helical blade (≥10 mm). Fifteen patients (6.7%) had blade migration in the head, including 7 patients (3.1%) with typical cutout and 8 patients (3.6%) with medial perforation without loss of reduction. Three patients (1.3%) sustained a femoral shaft fracture at the tip of the nail. The quality of calcar reduction was significantly predictive of all modes of failure (p < 0.05), except femoral shaft fracture at the nail tip.
CONCLUSION: The most common mechanical complication was lateral migration of the helical blade; however, this rarely led to a clinical problem. Medial migration of the blade in the head without loss of reduction was the second most frequent complication. We have identified a new complication associated with the TFN, that is, medial perforation without loss of reduction. Blade migration in the head was less frequent when blades were placed inferiorly with a tip-apex distance of at least 15 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887564     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a2c43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  27 in total

1.  Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Kayla Pfaff; Michael Heffner; Noelle Van Rysselberghe; Malcolm R DeBaun; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-15

2.  The challenge of non-union in subtrochanteric fractures with breakage of intramedullary nail: evaluation of outcomes in surgery revision with angled blade plate and allograft bone strut.

Authors:  G Rollo; N Tartaglia; G Falzarano; P Pichierri; A Stasi; A Medici; L Meccariello
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Analysis of complications of intertrochanteric fracture treated with Gamma 3 intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Haijing Huang; Jingyi Xin; Baotong Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-10-15

4.  Use of a Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) with cement augmentation for treatment of trochanteric fractures in patients greater than sixty five years of age.

Authors:  Marie Fernandez; Yoann David; Frédéric Dubrana; Rémi Di Francia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Risk factors for cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail of double proximal screw design.

Authors:  Ali Şişman; Özgür Avci; Serdar Kamil Çepni; Suat Batar; Ömer Polat
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-03-17

6.  Trochanteric fixation nail advanced with helical blade and cement augmentation: early experience with a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-17

7.  Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome.

Authors:  Xavier Lizano-Díez; Marius Johann Baptist Keel; Klaus Arno Siebenrock; Marc Tey; Johannes Dominik Bastian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 8.  Cement augmentation for trochanteric fracture in elderly: A systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Stramazzo; Salvatore Ratano; Francesco Monachino; Davide Pavan; Giuseppe Rovere; Lawrence Camarda
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-20

9.  Indications for cement augmentation in fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: a systematic review of evidence.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Matt L Graves; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  [Comparison of the predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar referenced tip-apex distance in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with Asian type proximal femoral nail fixation].

Authors:  Yuwei Cai; Juntao Feng; Yu Chen; Meng Shi; Zhongxiang Yu; Lei Fang; Lin Zhou; Shengming Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.