Literature DB >> 23887011

Doctors' perceptions and use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Maartje H J Swennen1, Geert J M G van der Heijden, Hennie R Boeije, Nanda van Rheenen, Floor J M Verheul, Yolanda van der Graaf, Cor J Kalkman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many primary qualitative studies of barriers and facilitators for doctors' use of evidence-based medicine (EBM) are available, but knowledge remains fragmented. This study sought to synthesize the results of these qualitative studies, taking the variability across context (i.e., medical disciplines, career stages, practice settings, and time of study) into account.
METHOD: The authors searched PubMed through April 26, 2012, and independently selected studies according to prespecified criteria for relevance and methodological quality. Additionally, they performed a thematic synthesis through line-by-line interpretation, coding, and thematic arrangement of information.
RESULTS: The search resulted in 1,211 publications, of which 30 studies were included. Five major themes emerged on barriers and facilitators for doctors' use of EBM: individual mind-set, professional group norms, EBM competencies, balance between confidence and critical reflection, and managerial collaboration. The authors found particular barriers and facilitators across career stages. Although clinical experience and professional status were perceived to be helpful, they could also prevent doctors from identifying information needs and adopting new evidence. Although residents' lack of clinical experience raised awareness of information needs, residents perceived lack of clinical experience and their hierarchical dependence on staff as barriers to articulating information needs and to translating and introducing evidence to patient care.
CONCLUSIONS: Encouragement of group norms for safe communication and shared learning across career stages is perceived as the most prominent facilitator for EBM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887011     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829ed3cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  23 in total

1.  Antibiotic prescribing for the future: exploring the attitudes of trainees in general practice.

Authors:  Anthea Dallas; Mieke van Driel; Thea van de Mortel; Parker Magin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Evidence-based practice in well-child care.

Authors:  J J De Schipper; Ajm Hermans; Adc Jaarsma; F W Noordik; S A Reijneveld
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.860

3.  A Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Associated with Provider Adherence to Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Guidelines.

Authors:  Sarah M Brolliar; Megan Moore; Hilaire J Thompson; Lauren K Whiteside; Richard B Mink; Mark S Wainwright; Jonathan I Groner; Michael J Bell; Christopher C Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Linda Ng Boyle; Pamela H Mitchell; Frederick P Rivara; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  High-Value Consults: A Curriculum to Promote Point-of-Care, Evidence-Based Recommendations.

Authors:  Deepa Rani Nandiwada; Amar Kohli; Megan McNamara; Kenneth J Smith; Shanta Zimmer; Melissa McNeil; Carla Spagnoletti; Doris Rubio; Kathryn Berlacher
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-10

5.  Quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Linh Tran; Dao Ngoc Hien Tam; Abdelrahman Elshafay; Thao Dang; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults: a scoping review.

Authors:  André S Pollmann; Andrea L Murphy; Joel C Bergman; David M Gardner
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Impact of an online medical internet site on knowledge and practice of health care providers: a mixed methods study of the Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence project.

Authors:  Janice J Eng; Vanessa K Noonan; Andrea F Townson; Caroline E Higgins; Jess Rogers; Dalton L Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Why is there variation in the practice of evidence-based medicine in primary care? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ranita Hisham; Chirk Jenn Ng; Su May Liew; Nurazira Hamzah; Gah Juan Ho
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Factors affecting management of children's low-risk distal radius fractures in the emergency department: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tara Baxter; Teresa To; Maria Chiu; Mark Camp; Andrew Howard
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 10.  Recovery from Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Perspectives of Consumers, Clinicians, Family and Carers.

Authors:  Fiona Y Y Ng; Marianne E Bourke; Brin F S Grenyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.