BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), the hyperemic ratio of distal (Pd) to proximal (Pa) coronary pressure, is used to identify the need for coronary revascularization. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) might affect measurements of FFR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LVEDP was recorded simultaneously with Pd and Pa during conventional FFR measurement as well as during additional infusion of nitroprusside. The relationship between LVEDP, Pa, and FFR was assessed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Prospectively collected data for 528 cardiac cycles from 20 coronary arteries in 17 patients were analyzed. Baseline median Pa, Pd, FFR, and LVEDP were 73 mmHg, 49 mmHg, 0.69, and 18 mmHg, respectively. FFR<0.80 was present in 14 arteries (70%). With nitroprusside median Pa, Pd, FFR, and LVEDP were 61 mmHg, 42 mmHg, 0.68, and 12 mmHg, respectively. In a multivariable model for the entire population LVEDP was positively associated with FFR such that FFR increased by 0.008 for every 1-mmHg increase in LVEDP (beta=0.008; P<0.001), an association that was greater in obstructed arteries with FFR<0.80 (beta=0.01; P<0.001). Pa did not directly affect FFR in the multivariable model, but an interaction between LVEDP and Pa determined that LVEDP's effect on FFR is greater at lower Pa. CONCLUSIONS: LVEDP was positively associated with FFR. The association was greater in obstructive disease (FFR<0.80) and at lower Pa. These findings have implications for the use of FFR to guide revascularization in patients with heart failure. SUMMARY FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS: The impact of left ventricular diastolic pressure on measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not well described. We present a hemodynamic study of the issue, concluding that increasing left ventricular diastolic pressure can increase measurements of FFR, particularly in patients with FFR<0.80 and lower blood pressure.
BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), the hyperemic ratio of distal (Pd) to proximal (Pa) coronary pressure, is used to identify the need for coronary revascularization. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) might affect measurements of FFR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LVEDP was recorded simultaneously with Pd and Pa during conventional FFR measurement as well as during additional infusion of nitroprusside. The relationship between LVEDP, Pa, and FFR was assessed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Prospectively collected data for 528 cardiac cycles from 20 coronary arteries in 17 patients were analyzed. Baseline median Pa, Pd, FFR, and LVEDP were 73 mmHg, 49 mmHg, 0.69, and 18 mmHg, respectively. FFR<0.80 was present in 14 arteries (70%). With nitroprusside median Pa, Pd, FFR, and LVEDP were 61 mmHg, 42 mmHg, 0.68, and 12 mmHg, respectively. In a multivariable model for the entire population LVEDP was positively associated with FFR such that FFR increased by 0.008 for every 1-mmHg increase in LVEDP (beta=0.008; P<0.001), an association that was greater in obstructed arteries with FFR<0.80 (beta=0.01; P<0.001). Pa did not directly affect FFR in the multivariable model, but an interaction between LVEDP and Pa determined that LVEDP's effect on FFR is greater at lower Pa. CONCLUSIONS:LVEDP was positively associated with FFR. The association was greater in obstructive disease (FFR<0.80) and at lower Pa. These findings have implications for the use of FFR to guide revascularization in patients with heart failure. SUMMARY FOR ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS: The impact of left ventricular diastolic pressure on measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not well described. We present a hemodynamic study of the issue, concluding that increasing left ventricular diastolic pressure can increase measurements of FFR, particularly in patients with FFR<0.80 and lower blood pressure.
Authors: Jamie Layland; Andrew M Wilson; Robert J Whitbourn; Andrew T Burns; Jithendra Somaratne; George Leitl; Andrew I Macisaac Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: S A Chamuleau; M Meuwissen; B L van Eck-Smit; K T Koch; A de Jong; R J de Winter; C E Schotborgh; M Bax; H J Verberne; J G Tijssen; J J Piek Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Emanuele Barbato; Jozef Bartunek; Jan-Willem Bech; William Wijns; Guy R Heyndrickx Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B De Bruyne; T Baudhuin; J A Melin; N H Pijls; S U Sys; A Bol; W J Paulus; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N H Pijls; B Van Gelder; P Van der Voort; K Peels; F A Bracke; H J Bonnier; M I el Gamal Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-12-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tara Shah; Joshua D Geleris; Ming Zhong; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Luke K Kim; Dmitriy N Feldman Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.895