Literature DB >> 23886556

Delayed autologous breast reconstruction: factors which influence patient decision making.

Jonas A Nelson1, John P Fischer, M Anne Radecki, Christina Pasick, Jennifer McGrath, Joseph M Serletti, Liza C Wu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction timing continues to be controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine delayed autologous breast reconstruction at a center favouring immediate reconstruction to better understand factors driving the decision to delay reconstruction.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all free autologous breast reconstruction patients between 2005 and 2009, focussing on ethnicity, cancer stage, unilateral or bilateral reconstructions, initial management, distance from the institution, and average income. Delayed reconstructions were compared to immediate reconstructions. All delayed reconstructions were surveyed to examine treatment and reconstruction decisions and satisfaction.
RESULTS: Of 709 patients, 169 (24%) underwent delayed treatment. Delayed reconstruction patients had higher cancer stages (p < 0.001), higher rates of pre-reconstruction radiation therapy (64% vs. 20%, p < 0.0001) and higher rates of unilateral reconstruction (64% vs. 48%, p < 0.001). Seventy delayed patients responded to the survey (41%), with 75% having had their initial mastectomy at an outside health system. Only 51% discussed immediate reconstruction prior to electing delayed treatment and 41% had no discussion regarding advantages or disadvantages to reconstructive options. Approximately 30% noted no choice in their reconstructive timing. Forty five percent would elect immediate reconstruction if given the option.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that women may not be receiving all available information prior to undergoing mastectomy for initial breast cancer treatment. As a significant portion of women electing delayed reconstruction would elect immediate autologous reconstruction if given the option again, there is room for improvement in pre-operative patient education and in the education of our oncology colleagues.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous; Breast reconstruction; Decision making; Delayed reconstruction; Free flap; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886556     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

Review 1.  Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice.

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; Meagan Brennan; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Barriers to Completing Delayed Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy: a Critical Need for Patient and Clinician Education.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ogrodnik; Susan MacLennan; Donald Weaver; Ted James
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Distance to a Plastic Surgeon and Type of Insurance Plan Are Independently Predictive of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle C Roughton; Paul DiEgidio; Lei Zhou; Karyn Stitzenberg; Anne Marie Meyer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Authors:  Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy; Benjamin B Massenburg; John M Rozehnal; Nachi Gupta; Jonatan Hernandez Rosa; Michael J Ingargiola; Peter J Taub
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Design and Focus Test of a Preconsultation Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Reconstruction Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hui; Xiang X Liu; Anna Luan; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-06-22

6.  An Innovative Risk-Reducing Approach to Postmastectomy Radiation Delivery after Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Merisa L Piper; Maristella Evangelista; Dominic Amara; David Daar; Robert D Foster; Barbara Fowble; Hani Sbitany
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 7.  Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Xuejing Li; Meiqi Meng; Junqiang Zhao; Xiaoyan Zhang; Dan Yang; Jiaxin Fang; Junxin Wang; Liu Han; Yufang Hao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Women and Partners' Information Need, Emotional Adjustment, and Breast Reconstruction Decision-Making Before Mastectomy.

Authors:  Kristopher Lamore; Cécile Flahault; Aurélie Untas
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  Complications following immediate compared to delayed deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

Authors:  J Beugels; L Bod; S M J van Kuijk; S S Qiu; S M H Tuinder; E M Heuts; A Piatkowski; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.872

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.