Literature DB >> 23884804

Durable fixation achieved with medialized, high hip center cementless THAs for Crowe II and III dysplasia.

Danyal H Nawabi1, Morteza Meftah, Denis Nam, Amar S Ranawat, Chitranjan S Ranawat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high hip center total hip arthroplasty (THA) for dysplasia allows more complete socket coverage by native bone at the expense of abnormal hip biomechanics. Despite poor results with cemented components, intermediate-term results with cementless cups at a high hip center have been promising, but there are few reports at long-term followup without bone graft. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to examine (1) survivorship; 2) radiographic results; and 3) hip scores at a minimum of 10 years for patients treated with high hip center cementless THA for Crowe II and III dysplasia without bone graft.
METHODS: We reviewed charts and radiographs of 32 patients with Crowe II or III dysplasia who were treated with high hip center cementless THA; at a mean followup of 12 years (range, 10-21 years), 23 patients (27 hips) were available for review. We sought to medialize cups to the inner table to achieve bony coverage of > 75%. At final followup, the WOMAC and Harris hip scores were recorded. Radiographic analysis including computerized wear evaluation was performed. Radiographic parameters were compared with a control group of 23 patients with Crowe I dysplasia who had cementless cups placed at an anatomic hip center; among the high hip center reconstructions, we also compared wear between those in the superolateral and superomedial quadrants.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survivorship for all-cause revisions was 97% (95% confidence interval, 79%-99%) in the high hip center group; this was no different from the anatomic hip center group. There were no revisions for acetabular loosening. Wear rates did not differ significantly between the high hip center and the control group, but lateralized high hip centers were associated with higher (p = 0.002) wear. Hip scores were excellent in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In Crowe II and III dysplasia, a high hip center cementless cup obviates the need for bone graft and provides durable fixation beyond 10 years. Medialization of these reconstructions seems important to decrease wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23884804      PMCID: PMC3890163          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3187-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Minimum 5-year wear analysis of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 65 years and younger.

Authors:  Amar S Ranawat; Panagiotis Tsailis; Morteza Meftah; Trevor W Koob; Jose A Rodriguez; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Failure of acetabular autogenous grafts in total hip arthroplasty. Increasing incidence: a follow-up note.

Authors:  R D Mulroy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  G M Russotti; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W Pagnano; A D Hanssen; D G Lewallen; W J Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Primary cementless acetabular components in hips with severe developmental dysplasia or total dislocation. A concise follow-up, at an average of sixteen years, of a previous report.

Authors:  Brett J Hampton; William H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  High placement of noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report.

Authors:  Kelly J Hendricks; William H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  High placement of porous-coated acetabular components in complex total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S F Schutzer; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.

Authors:  A A Shinar; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Total hip arthroplasty with insertion of the acetabular component without cement in hips with total congenital dislocation or marked congenital dysplasia.

Authors:  M J Anderson; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Minimum ten-year results of a porous acetabular component for Crowe I to III hip dysplasia using an elevated hip center.

Authors:  Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Kengo Yamada; Kiyokazu Fukui; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  18 in total

1.  The necessity to restore the anatomic hip centre in congenital hip disease.

Authors:  George A Macheras; Panagiotis Lepetsos; Panagiotis P Anastasopoulos; Spyridon P Galanakos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  [Arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia: Problem-oriented treatment strategies].

Authors:  K P Günther; M Stiehler; J Goronzy; W Schneiders; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Challenges of primary hip arthroplasty with high hip dislocation].

Authors:  A Roth; S Goralski; F Layher; J Fakler; M Ghanem; C Pempe; R Hennings; U Spiegl; D Zajonz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Does Balancing a Total Hip Arthroplasty Require a New Paradigm? Functional 3-Dimensional Balancing in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vijay C Bose; Suryanarayan Pichai; P S Ashok Kumar; Kalaivanan Kanniyan; Subramanyam Yadlapalli; Shantanu Patil
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  CORR Insights®: Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.

Authors:  Rémy S Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Stirling; Maria-Roxana Viamont-Guerra; Louise Strom; Antonia F Chen; Mo Saffarini; Luca Nover; Frederic Laude
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Developmental Hip Dysplasia Treated with Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Straight Stem and a Threaded Cup-A Concise Follow-Up, At a Mean of Twenty-Three Years.

Authors:  Viktor Janz; Christian Hipfl; Felix Düppers; Carsten F Perka; Georgi I Wassilew
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Surgical Approach and Reaming Depth Influence the Direction and Magnitude of Acetabular Center of Rotation Changes During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jessica R Benson; Meinusha Govindarajan; Jeffrey M Muir; Iain R Lamb; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-17

9.  Best bone of acetabulum for cup component placement in Crowe types I to III dysplastic hips: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Lin-Li Zheng; Yang-Yang Lin; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Qian-Hui Ling; Wei-Ming Liao; Pei-Hui Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Determination of the hip rotation centre from landmarks in pelvic radiograph.

Authors:  Hasan Bombaci; Bestami Simsek; Mehmet Soyarslan; Mustafa Murat Yildirim
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.