Literature DB >> 23884688

Recollection can support hybrid visual memory search.

Emma B Guild1, Jenna M Cripps, Nicole D Anderson, Naseem Al-Aidroos.   

Abstract

On a daily basis, we accomplish the task of searching our visual environment for one of a number of possible objects, like searching for any one of our friends in a crowd, and we do this with ease. Understanding how attention, perception, and long-term memory interact to accomplish this process remains an important question. Recent research (Wolfe in Psychological Science 23:698-703, 2012) has shown that increasing the number of possible targets one is searching for adds little cost to the efficiency of visual search-specifically, that response times increase logarithmically with memory set size. It is unclear, however, what type of recognition memory process (familiarity or recollection) supports a hybrid visual memory search. Previous hybrid search paradigms create conditions that allow participants to rely on the familiarity of perceptually identical targets. In two experiments, we show that hybrid search remains efficient even when the familiarity of targets is minimized (Experiment 1) and when participants are encouraged to flexibly retrieve target information that is perceptually distinct from the information previously studied (Experiment 2). We propose that such efficient and flexible performance on a hybrid search task may engage a rapid from of recollection (Moscovitch in Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:62-79, 2008). We discuss possible neural correlates supporting simultaneous perception, comparison of incoming information, and recollection of episodic memories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23884688     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0483-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Modality specificity of implicit memory for new associations.

Authors:  D L Schacter; P Graf
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A complementary analytic approach to examining medial temporal lobe sources using magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Lily Riggs; Sandra N Moses; Tim Bardouille; Anthony T Herdman; Bernhard Ross; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The hippocampus as a "stupid," domain-specific module: Implications for theories of recent and remote memory, and of imagination.

Authors:  Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2008-03

Review 4.  Recognition memory: neuronal substrates of the judgement of prior occurrence.

Authors:  M W Brown; J Z Xiang
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Lag-sensitive repetition suppression effects in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus.

Authors:  Craig J Brozinsky; Andrew P Yonelinas; Neal E A Kroll; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; John T Wixted; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Rapid onset relational memory effects are evident in eye movement behavior, but not in hippocampal amnesia.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Jennifer D Ryan; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The eyes have it: hippocampal activity predicts expression of memory in eye movements.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The hippocampus supports multiple cognitive processes through relational binding and comparison.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; Sandra N Moses; Lily Riggs; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Sage E P Boettcher; Emilie L Josephs; Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect.

Authors:  Aumyo Hassan; Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-13

3.  Examining the effects of passive and active strategies on behavior during hybrid visual memory search: evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Jessica Madrid; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-09-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.