| Literature DB >> 23884118 |
Anabelle C L Batista1, Marta C Freitas Silva, Jefferson B Batista, Aline Elesbão Nascimento, Galba M Campos-Takaki.
Abstract
Due to the existence of new methodologies that have reduced the production costs of microbiological chitosan, this paper puts forward the use of agro-industrial residues in order to produce microbiological chitosan and to apply chitosan as an innovative resource for removing acid orange 7 (AO7) from wastewaters. The best culture conditions were selected by a full 24 factorial design, and the removal of the dye was optimized by a 23 central composite rotational design. The results showed that corn steep liquor (CSL) is an agro-industrial residue that can be advantageously used to produce microbiological chitosan with yields up to 7.8 g/kg of substrate. FT-IR spectra of the product showed typical peak distributions like those of standard chitosan which confirmed the extracted product was chitosan-like. The efficiency of removing low concentrations of AO7 by using microbiological chitosan in distilled water (up to 89.96%) and tap water (up to 80.60%) was significantly higher than the efficiency of the control (chitosan obtained from crustaceans), suggesting that this biopolymer is a better economic alternative for discoloring wastewater where a low concentration of the dye is considered toxic. The high percentage recovery of AO7 from the microbiological chitosan particles used favors this biopolymer as a possible bleaching agent which may be reusable.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23884118 PMCID: PMC6269976 DOI: 10.3390/molecules18077646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Results of 23central complete rotational design (CCRD), with six axial points and four central points which show the efficiency in removing the orange acid 7 (AO7) from solutions by microbiological or standard chitosan (CS) in distilled or tap water. Data acquired after 2 h of incubation.
| Assay | Independent variables | Discoloration | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [CS] | [dye] | pH | Microbiological CS | Standard CS | |||
| Distilled water †‡ | Tap water ‡ | Distilled water ‡ | Tap water ‡ | ||||
|
| −1 | −1 | −1 | 70.91a | 58.21 | 56.95 | 49.58 |
|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 75.45b | 61.21 | 45.54 | 51.58 |
|
| −1 | 1 | −1 | 34.90c | 68.21 | 71.53 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | −1 | 76.62b | 73.39 | 67.57 | 68.50 |
|
| −1 | −1 | 1 | 55.31d | 58.36 | 56.43 | 45.42 |
|
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 58.63d | 61.1 | 52.37 | 53.21 |
|
| −1 | 1 | 1 | 33.35c | 70.69 | 63.39 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 72.66 | 67.68 | 71.68 | |
|
| −1.68 | 0 | 0 | 14.91f | 32.23 | 71.79 | |
|
| 1.68 | 0 | 0 | 66.18g | 68.23 | 62.17 | 67.03 |
|
| 0 | −1.68 | 0 | 71.27a | 52.88 | 38.46 | 40.04 |
|
| 0 | 1.68 | 0 | 56.67d | 64.88 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | −1.68 | 85.28h | 72.48 | 68.48 | 67.21 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1.68 | 80.57i | 66.27 | 63.87 | 55.53 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.26bi | 62.20 | 62.94 | 65.12 | |
* Results expressed as the average of quadruplicates; † Values in the same column with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) when Tukey's HSD tests are used; ‡ Values underlined, in different columns, and with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) when Tukey’s HSD tests are used.
Figure 1The 3D-surface plot (left) and 2D-projection (right) showing the interactions between standard chitosan concentration and dye concentration at pH 3.0 on discoloration efficiency in distilled water.
Figure 2The 3D-surface plot (left) and 2D-projection (right) showing the interactions between microbiological chitosan concentration and dye concentration at pH 3.0 on decoloration efficiency in distilled water.
Figure 3The 2D-projections showing the interactions between microbiological chitosan concentration and dye concentration at different pH evaluated by CCRD in distilled water.
24 Full factorial design, with three central points. Coded (CD) and uncoded (UCD) values to assess the main effects of independent variables on chitosan production.
| Independent Variables | CD (UCD) | CD (UCD) | CD (UCD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSL | −1 (2%) | 0 (6%) | 1 (10%) |
| pH | −1 (4.0) | 0 (6.0) | 1 (8.0) |
| Temperature | −1 (25 °C) | 0 (31 °C) | 1 (37 °C) |
| Size of inoculums | −1 (102 spores/mL) | 0 (5 × 105 spores/mL) | 1 (106 spores/mL) |
CSL = corn steep liquor.
Central composite rotational design (CCRD), 23 with six axial points and four central points was used to analyse the flocculant-coagulant action of chitosan (CS). The same CCRD was used to assess the action of microbiological and standard chitosan in distilled water or tap water. Coded (CD) and uncoded (UCD) values are given in the Table.
| Factors | CD (UCD) –α | CD (UCD) | CD (UCD) | CD (UCD) | CD (UCD) +α |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [CS] | −1.68 (32 mg/mL) | −1 (100 mg/mL) | 0 (200 mg/mL) | 1 (300 mg/mL) | 1.68 (368 mg/mL) |
| [dye] | −1.68 (20 mg/mL) | −1 (37 mg/mL) | 0 (62.5 mg/mL) | 1 (88 mg/mL) | 1.68 (105 mg/mL) |
| pH | −1.68 (1.6) | −1 (3.0) | 0 (5.0) | 1 (7.0) | 1.68 (8.3) |
Factors = Independent variables.
Figure 4(a) Chemical structure of azo dye acid Orange 7 (AO7); (b) Chemical structure of chitosan and possible intermolecular bonds.