| Literature DB >> 23883448 |
Mei-Fang Li, Yin-Fang Tu, Lian-Xi Li, Jun-Xi Lu, Xue-Hong Dong, Li-Bo Yu, Rong Zhang, Yu-Qian Bao, Wei-Ping Jia, Ren-Ming Hu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low-grade albuminuria is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and mortality. Our aim was to investigate the association between low-grade albuminuria and carotid atherosclerotic lesions in community-based patients with type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23883448 PMCID: PMC3725174 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Clinical characteristics of the subjects
| UACR range (mg/mmol) | ≤1.19 | 1.20-1.99 | ≥2.00 | - | - |
| AGE (y) | 63 ± 11 | 65 ± 10 | 68 ± 9 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Male, n (%) | 69(43.7) | 64(40.3) | 57(36.1) | 0.386 | 0.129 |
| Duration of diabetes (y) | 6 ± 6 | 7 ± 7 | 9 ± 8 | 0.002 | 0.032 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 40(25.3) | 38(23.9) | 26(16.5) | 0.123 | 0.886 |
| Alcohol, n (%) | 18(11.4) | 22(13.8) | 21(13.3) | 0.792 | 0.318 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.95 ± 2.89 | 24.94 ± 3.74 | 25.03 ± 3.38 | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| WHR | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 0.337 | 0.232 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 85(53.8) | 89(56.0) | 113(71.5) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| *SBP (mmHg) | 135(115–150) | 120(110–140) | 130(120–140) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80 ± 13 | 81 ± 11 | 84 ± 11 | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| *FPG (mmol/L) | 7.4(6.5-8.5) | 7.8(6.7-9.8) | 7.7(6.6-9.9) | 0.049 | 0.025 |
| *2 h PPG (mmol/L) | 12.1(9.7-16.9) | 13.9(10.9-17.1) | 14.1(9.9-19.6) | 0.032 | 0.028 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.82 ± 1.39 | 6.99 ± 1.50 | 7.19 ± 1.53 | 0.089 | 0.026 |
| FIN (uIU/mL) | 16.57 ± 32.37 | 14.43 ± 10.12 | 15.06 ± 12.33 | 0.645 | 0.531 |
| 2 h IN (uIU/mL) | 52.50 ± 47.08 | 50.07 ± 41.87 | 58.62 ± 65.39 | 0.331 | 0.946 |
| HOMA-IR | 5.34 ± 7.20 | 5.59 ± 4.48 | 5.57 ± 4.59 | 0.91 | 0.555 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.98 ± 1.47 | 5.93 ± 1.30 | 6.11 ± 1.56 | 0.531 | 0.804 |
| Scr (umol/L) | 69.22 ± 15.70 | 65.48 ± 16.00 | 66.50 ± 16.73 | 0.102 | 0.069 |
| UA (mmol/L) | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.061 | 0.66 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 95.11 ± 21.27 | 100.10 ± 24.17 | 96.65 ± 23.83 | 0.146 | 0.01 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.13 ± 0.87 | 5.45 ± 1.08 | 5.33 ± 1.06 | 0.015 | 0.201 |
| *TG (mmol/L) | 1.63(1.03-2.26) | 1.61(1.10-2.24) | 1.64(1.08-2.07) | 0.941 | 0.916 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.24 ± 0.33 | 1.33 ± 0.39 | 1.28 ± 0.36 | 0.716 | 0.689 |
| *LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.90(2.50-3.30) | 3.00(2.40-3.70) | 3.00(2.50-3.60) | 0.515 | 0.935 |
Values are presented as mean ± S.D, median with interquartile range, or percentage. *Non-normal distribution of continuous variables.
P value: The p-values were not adjusted for age and sex for the trend.
*P value: The p-values were adjusted for age and sex for the trend.
Figure 1Comparison of carotid atherosclerotic lesions among UACR tertile groups after adjusting for age and sex. (A) Comparison of mean CIMT among the three groups. The p-value for the three-group comparison was 0.01. (B) The distribution of carotid atherosclerotic plaque among the three groups. The p-value for the three-group comparison was 0.354 for one-sided plaque and 0.158 for two-sided plaque (C) Comparisons of the prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque among three groups. The p-value for three group comparison was 0.026. (D) Odds ratio of carotid plaque for the 2nd and 3rd UACR tertile subjects in comparison to the 1st UACR tertile subjects. The bar represents the 95% confidence interval. Compared with the 1st tertile, *p = 0.047 and **p = 0.008, respectively. (E) Comparison of the prevalence of carotid stenosis among the three groups. The p-value for the three-group comparison was 0.954. (F) Odds ratio of carotid plaque for the 2nd and 3rd UACR tertile subjects in comparison to the 1st UACR tertile subjects. The bar represents the 95% confidence interval.
Comparison of carotid atherosclerotic lesions stratified by sex and age in each UACR tertile group
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st tertile | Male | 0.94 ± 0.42 | 0.1 | 33.30% | 0.053 | 4.30% | 0.472 |
| Female | 0.84 ± 0.28 | 19.10% | 2.30% | ||||
| 2nd tertile | Male | 1.01 ± 0.48 | 0.634 | 39.10% | 0.925 | 0.00% | N/A |
| Female | 0.97 ± 0.39 | 38.90% | 0.00% | ||||
| 3rd tertile | Male | 1.12 ± 0.37 | 0.045 | 36.80% | 0.04 | 5.30% | 0.774 |
| Female | 0.99 ± 0.33 | 51.50% | 3.00% | ||||
| 1st tertile | Age < 65 | 0.80 ± 0.29 | 0.001 | 17.00% | 0.009 | 3.40% | 0.832 |
| Age ≥ 65 | 0.99 ± 0.39 | 35.70% | 2.90% | ||||
| 2nd tertile | Age < 65 | 0.94 ± 0.45 | 0.062 | 25.40% | 0.005 | 0.00% | N/A |
| Age ≥ 65 | 1.02 ± 0.42 | 47.90% | 0.00% | ||||
| 3rd tertile | Age < 65 | 0.91 ± 0.33 | 0.002 | 32.00% | 0.013 | 0.00% | 0.997 |
| Age ≥ 65 | 1.09 ± 0.34 | 52.80% | 5.60% | ||||
P value: The p values were adjusted for either sex or age for the trend.
Association of UACR tertile with CIMT and carotid plaques by linear regression and binary logistic regression
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||||
| Model I | 0.055 | 0.013-0.097 | 0.011 | 1 | 1.608 (0.971-2.662) | 1.662 (0.995-2.775) | 0.099 |
| Model II | 0.065 | 0.022-0.107 | 0.003 | 1 | 1.876 (1.118-3.148) | 2.016 (1.199-3.391) | 0.017 |
| Model III | 0.058 | 0.016-0.100 | 0.007 | 1 | 1.878 (1.116-3.161) | 2.028 (1.195-3.439) | 0.018 |
Model I: Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, duration of diabetes and hypertension.
Model II: Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, duration of diabetes, hypertension, BMI, WHR, SBP, DBP, and eGFR.
Model III: Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, duration of diabetes, hypertension, BMI, WHR, SBP, DBP, eGFR, FPG, 2 h PPG, HbA1c, FIN, 2hIN, HOMA-IR, BUN, Scr, UA, TG, TC, and LDL-C.