OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to compare the diagnostic performances of shearwave and strain elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound and shear-wave and strain elastography were performed in 150 breast lesions; 71 were malignant. BI-RADS final assessment, elasticity values in kilopascals, and elasticity scores on a 5-point scale were assessed before biopsy. The results were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The AUC for shear-wave elastography was similar to that of strain elastography (0.928 vs 0.943). The combined use of B-mode ultrasound and either elastography technique improved diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions compared with the use of B-mode ultrasound alone (B-mode alone, AUC = 0.851; B-mode plus shear-wave elastography, AUC = 0.964; B-mode plus strain elastography, AUC = 0.965; p < 0.001). With the best cutoff points of 80 kPa on shear-wave elastography and a score between 3 and 4 on strain elastography, the sensitivity was higher in shear-wave elastography, and specificity was higher in strain elastography (95.8% vs 81.7%, p = 0.002; 93.7% vs 84.8%, p = 0.016). In cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma, mean elasticity scores were lower in grade 3 than in grade 1 and 2 cancers (p = 0.017) with strain elastography causing false-negative findings. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of shear-wave and strain elastography was similar. Either elastography technique can improve overall diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions when combined with B-mode ultrasound. However, the sensitivity and specificity of shear-wave and strain elastography were different according to lesion histologic profile, tumor grade, and breast thickness.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to compare the diagnostic performances of shearwave and strain elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasound and shear-wave and strain elastography were performed in 150 breast lesions; 71 were malignant. BI-RADS final assessment, elasticity values in kilopascals, and elasticity scores on a 5-point scale were assessed before biopsy. The results were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The AUC for shear-wave elastography was similar to that of strain elastography (0.928 vs 0.943). The combined use of B-mode ultrasound and either elastography technique improved diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions compared with the use of B-mode ultrasound alone (B-mode alone, AUC = 0.851; B-mode plus shear-wave elastography, AUC = 0.964; B-mode plus strain elastography, AUC = 0.965; p < 0.001). With the best cutoff points of 80 kPa on shear-wave elastography and a score between 3 and 4 on strain elastography, the sensitivity was higher in shear-wave elastography, and specificity was higher in strain elastography (95.8% vs 81.7%, p = 0.002; 93.7% vs 84.8%, p = 0.016). In cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma, mean elasticity scores were lower in grade 3 than in grade 1 and 2 cancers (p = 0.017) with strain elastography causing false-negative findings. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of shear-wave and strain elastography was similar. Either elastography technique can improve overall diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions when combined with B-mode ultrasound. However, the sensitivity and specificity of shear-wave and strain elastography were different according to lesion histologic profile, tumor grade, and breast thickness.