Literature DB >> 23881803

Long-term results of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

L Rodríguez1, P Rodriguez, B Gómez, J C Ayala, D Oksenberg, A Perez-Castilla, M G Netto, E Soffer, M D Crowell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), temporary electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) increases LES pressure without interference with LES relaxation. The aim of the current study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of long term LES electrical stimulation therapy (LES-EST), using a permanently implanted stimulator for the treatment of GERD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with GERD who were at least partially responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and who had hiatal hernia of ≤ 3 cm and esophagitis of Los Angeles Grade A, B, or C were included in the study. Stimulation electrodes were placed in the LES and a pulse generator (EndoStim LES Stimulation System; EndoStim BV, The Hague, The Netherlands) was implanted laparoscopically. LES stimulation was delivered at 20 Hz, 215 μs, 3 - 8 mA in multiple 30-minute sessions. Patients were evaluated at follow-up using the GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaire, daily symptom and medication diaries, the SF-12 Health Survey, esophageal pH testing, and high resolution manometry.
RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (mean age 53 ± 12 years; 14 men) were implanted and 23 completed the 12-month evaluation. No serious implantation or stimulation-related adverse affects or sensations were reported. Median composite GERD-HRQL score at 12 months was 2.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0 - 3.0), which was significantly better than baseline scores both on PPI therapy (median 9.0, IQR 6.0 - 10.0; P = 0.002) and off PPIs (median 23.5, IQR 21 - 25.75; P < 0.001). The median percentage of the 24-hour period with esophageal pH < 4.0 at baseline was 10.1 % (IQR 7.7 - 15.5), which was reduced to 3.3 % (1.8 - 6.9) at 12 months (P < 0.001), with 69 % of patients showing either normalization or > 50 % improvement in their distal esophageal pH. At 12 months, 96 % of patients (22/23) were completely off PPI medication.
CONCLUSION: During the long term follow-up of 12 months, LES - EST was safe and effective for the treatment of GERD. There was a significant and sustained improvement in GERD symptoms, reduction in esophageal acid exposure with elimination of daily PPI usage, and no stimulation-related adverse effects. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23881803     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  13 in total

1.  Effect of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter using endoscopically implanted temporary stimulation leads in patients with reflux disease.

Authors:  Rupa Banerjee; Nitesh Pratap; Rakesh Kalpala; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of GERD: New Tricks for an Old Disease.

Authors:  Rishi D Naik; Lauren Evers; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03

Review 3.  [EndoStim® treatment-a new minimally invasive technology in antireflux surgery].

Authors:  D Stephan; S Attwood; J Labenz; F Willeke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Long-term results of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of proximal GERD.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Leonardo Rodríguez; Edy Soffer; Michael D Crowell; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effect of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients refractory to proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Edy Soffer; Leonardo Rodríguez; Patricia Rodriguez; Beatriz Gómez; Manoel G Neto; Michael D Crowell
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-06

Review 6.  Surgical Anti-Reflux Options Beyond Fundoplication.

Authors:  Dan Azagury; John Morton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-07

Review 7.  Symptomatic reflux disease: the present, the past and the future.

Authors:  Guy Boeckxstaens; Hashem B El-Serag; André J P M Smout; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Electrical stimulation therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Nicolaas F Rinsma; Nicole D Bouvy; Ad A M Masclee; José M Conchillo
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Republished: symptomatic reflux disease: the present, the past and the future.

Authors:  Guy Boeckxstaens; Hashem B El-Serag; André J P M Smout; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 10.  Electrical stimulation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: current state of the art.

Authors:  Sharon E Kim; Edy Soffer
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.