BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) has been shown to increase lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in animals; however, data on the effect of EST on LES pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of EST on LES pressure and esophageal function in patients with GERD. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of GERD responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), increased esophageal acid on 24-h pH monitoring off GERD medications, basal LES pressure >5 mmHg, hernia <2 cm and esophagitis <LA grade B were included. A temporary pacemaker lead was placed endoscopically in the LES by creating a 3 cm submucosal tunnel, secured to the esophagus using endoscopic clips along the body of the lead and exteriorized nasally. EST was delivered 6-12 h post-implant per protocol using (i) short-pulse 200 μs, 20 Hz, and (ii) intermediate-pulse 3 ms, 20 Hz, each for 20 min at varying amplitudes. High-resolution manometry was performed pre-, during and post-EST. Symptoms of heartburn, chest or abdominal pain and dysphagia pre-, during and post-stimulation and 7 days post-procedure were recorded. Continuous cardiac monitoring was performed during and after the EST to evaluate any effect of EST on cardiac rhythm. RESULTS: Six male patients (mean age 34.6 years) underwent successful endoscopic lead implantation; the first patient had premature lead dislodgement and did not undergo EST. The remaining five patients underwent successful EST. All patients had a significant increase in LES pressure with all sessions of EST. There was no effect on swallow-induced LES relaxation, And there were no EST-related adverse symptoms or any cardiac rhythm abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, short-term EST delivered using electrodes endoscopically implanted in the LES results in a significant increase in LES pressure without affecting patients' swallow function or causing any adverse symptoms or cardiac rhythm disturbances. EST may offer a novel therapy to patients with GERD.
BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation therapy (EST) has been shown to increase lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in animals; however, data on the effect of EST on LES pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of EST on LES pressure and esophageal function in patients with GERD. METHODS:Patients with a diagnosis of GERD responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), increased esophageal acid on 24-h pH monitoring off GERD medications, basal LES pressure >5 mmHg, hernia <2 cm and esophagitis <LA grade B were included. A temporary pacemaker lead was placed endoscopically in the LES by creating a 3 cm submucosal tunnel, secured to the esophagus using endoscopic clips along the body of the lead and exteriorized nasally. EST was delivered 6-12 h post-implant per protocol using (i) short-pulse 200 μs, 20 Hz, and (ii) intermediate-pulse 3 ms, 20 Hz, each for 20 min at varying amplitudes. High-resolution manometry was performed pre-, during and post-EST. Symptoms of heartburn, chest or abdominal pain and dysphagia pre-, during and post-stimulation and 7 days post-procedure were recorded. Continuous cardiac monitoring was performed during and after the EST to evaluate any effect of EST on cardiac rhythm. RESULTS: Six male patients (mean age 34.6 years) underwent successful endoscopic lead implantation; the first patient had premature lead dislodgement and did not undergo EST. The remaining five patients underwent successful EST. All patients had a significant increase in LES pressure with all sessions of EST. There was no effect on swallow-induced LES relaxation, And there were no EST-related adverse symptoms or any cardiac rhythm abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, short-term EST delivered using electrodes endoscopically implanted in the LES results in a significant increase in LES pressure without affecting patients' swallow function or causing any adverse symptoms or cardiac rhythm disturbances. EST may offer a novel therapy to patients with GERD.
Authors: Richard W McCallum; William Snape; Fredrick Brody; John Wo; Henry P Parkman; Thomas Nowak Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Luigi Bonavina; Tom DeMeester; Paul Fockens; Daniel Dunn; Greta Saino; Davide Bona; John Lipham; Willem Bemelman; Robert A Ganz Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert S Sandler; James E Everhart; Mark Donowitz; Elizabeth Adams; Kelly Cronin; Clifford Goodman; Eric Gemmen; Shefali Shah; Aida Avdic; Robert Rubin Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Guy-Bernard Cadière; Nathalie Van Sante; Jaime E Graves; Anna K Gawlicka; Amin Rajan Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Claudia P Sanmiguel; Masanobu Hagiike; Martin P Mintchev; Ryan Dela Cruz; Edward H Phillips; Scott A Cunneen; Jeffrey L Conklin; Edy E Soffer Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Milena Nikolic; Katrin Schwameis; Matthias Paireder; Ivan Kristo; Georg Semmler; Lorenz Semmler; Ariane Steindl; Berta O Mosleh; Sebastian F Schoppmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379