Literature DB >> 23880918

Comparison of KTP, Thulium, and CO2 laser in stapedotomy using specialized visualization techniques: thermal effects.

Digna M A Kamalski1, Rudolf M Verdaasdonk, Tjeerd de Boorder, Robert Vincent, Franco Trabelzini, Wilko Grolman.   

Abstract

High-speed thermal imaging enables visualization of heating of the vestibule during laser-assisted stapedotomy, comparing KTP, CO2, and Thulium laser light. Perforation of the stapes footplate with laser bears the risk of heating of the inner ear fluids. The amount of heating depends on absorption of the laser light and subsequent tissue ablation. The ablation of the footplate is driven by strong water absorption for the CO2 and Thulium laser. For the KTP laser wavelength, ablation is driven by carbonization of the footplate and it might penetrate deep into the inner ear without absorption in water. The thermal effects were visualized in an inner ear model, using two new techniques: (1) high-speed Schlieren imaging shows relative dynamic changes of temperatures up to 2 ms resolution in the perilymph. (2) Thermo imaging provides absolute temperature measurements around the footplate up to 40 ms resolution. The high-speed Schlieren imaging showed minimal heating using the KTP laser. Both CO2 and Thulium laser showed heating below the footplate. Thulium laser wavelength generated heating up to 0.6 mm depth. This was confirmed with thermal imaging, showing a rise of temperature of 4.7 (±3.5) °C for KTP and 9.4 (±6.9) for Thulium in the area of 2 mm below the footplate. For stapedotomy, the Thulium and CO2 laser show more extended thermal effects compared to KTP. High-speed Schlieren imaging and thermal imaging are complimentary techniques to study lasers thermal effects in tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23880918     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2624-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

1.  Advantages and dangers of erbium laser application in stapedotomy.

Authors:  R Häusler; P J Schär; H Pratisto; H P Weber; M Frenz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  General history of stapedectomy.

Authors:  Rudolf Häusler
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007

3.  Imaging techniques for research and education of thermal and mechanical interactions of lasers with biological and model tissues.

Authors:  Rudolf M Verdaasdonk; Christiaan F P van Swol; Matthijs C M Grimbergen; Alex I Rem
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Lasers for otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532.

Authors:  S G Lesinski; A Palmer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Fiberoptic argon laser stapedotomy: is it safe?

Authors:  S Gherini; K L Horn; J B Causse; G R McArthur
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1993-05

6.  Laser stepedotomy for otosclerosis.

Authors:  R C Perkins
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Surface temperature distributions in carbon dioxide, argon, and KTP (Nd:YAG) laser ablated otic capsule and calvarial bone.

Authors:  B J Wong; J Neev; M J van Gemert
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

8.  CO2 laser stapedotomy: is it practical?

Authors:  G Gardner; J H Robertson; K Tomoda; W C Clark
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Thermal effects of laser stapedectomy in an animal model: CO2 versus KTP.

Authors:  S Kodali; S A Harvey; T E Prieto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Effect of temperature elevation on rabbit cochlear function as measured by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W S Noyes; T V McCaffrey; D A Fabry; M S Robinette; V J Suman
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  5 in total

1.  Robot-based assistance in middle ear surgery and cochlear implantation: first clinical report.

Authors:  Sykopetrites Vittoria; Ghizlene Lahlou; Renato Torres; Hannah Daoudi; Isabelle Mosnier; Stéphane Mazalaigue; Evelyne Ferrary; Yann Nguyen; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  CO2 laser stapedotomy safety: influence of laser energy and time on bone-conduction hearing levels.

Authors:  Uwe Schönfeld; Hu Weiming; Veit M Hofmann; Sergije Jovanovic; Andreas E Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Analysis of the Damage Mechanism Related to CO2 Laser Cochleostomy on Guinea Pig Cochlea.

Authors:  Xiang Liu; Xiao-Qing Qian; Rui Ma; Fang-Lu Chi; Dong-Dong Ren
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Optimizing Settings for Office-Based Endoscopic CO2 Laser Surgery Using an Experimental Vocal Cord Model.

Authors:  Anouk S Schimberg; Tim M Klabbers; David J Wellenstein; Floris Heutink; Jimmie Honings; Ilse van Engen-Van Grunsven; Rudolf M Verdaasdonk; Robert P Takes; Guido B van den Broek
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The Influence of a Metal Stent on the Distribution of Thermal Energy during Irreversible Electroporation.

Authors:  Hester J Scheffer; Jantien A Vogel; Willemien van den Bos; Robert E Neal; Krijn P van Lienden; Marc G H Besselink; Martin J C van Gemert; Cees W M van der Geld; Martijn R Meijerink; John H Klaessens; Rudolf M Verdaasdonk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.