| Literature DB >> 23879935 |
Yue Song1, Li-Jun Zhang, Hang Li, Yu Gu, Fan-Fan Li, Li-Na Jiang, Fang Liu, Jing Ye, Qing Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have positive effect on the regulation of plasma lipids. But the mechanism for them to modulate lipid homeostasis in macrophage is still unclear. In this study, we employed PUFA to pretreat macrophages and evaluated the variations of lipid droplet (LD) content, lipid composition, and expressions of LD-associated genes in macrophage-derived foam cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23879935 PMCID: PMC3751560 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Cell viability of THP-1 macrophage after pre-treatment with different NEFAs at different concentrations for 72 hours. The THP-1-derived macrophages were pretreated by PA, OA, LA and EPA separately with time and dose gradients. The cell viability was determined by MTT colorimetric assay. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 2Effects of PUFAs on intracellular lipid accumulation. Both THP-1 macrophages and monocyte macrophage were pre-treated with different NEFA at the concentration of 100 μM for 72 hours. Then ox-LDL was added to facilitate foam cell formation. The intracellular lipid droplets were stained with Nile Red (A). The average positive area of stained LDs per cell was used to quantify the intracellular lipid content (B). Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). ※P < 0.05 vs. control; #P < 0.05 vs. PA/OA group.
Figure 3Quantitative determination of TG, TC and CE in foam cells. The THP-1 macrophages or monocyte macrophages were pre-treated with different NEFA in advance, and then ox-LDL was added to facilitate foam cell formation. Intracellular TG, TC and free cholesterol were determined by enzymatic colorimetric assays (A-B). The concentration of CE was determined by subtracting free cholesterol from TC (C). Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3).※/#P < 0.05 vs. control (A); †/‡P < 0.05 vs. PA/OA group (B-C).
Figure 4Effects of PUFAs on cholesterol efflux to lipid-free apoAI or to HDL. THP-1 macrophages or monocyte-macrophages were pre-treated with different NEFA, and then incubated with ox-LDL containing 1 μCi/ml [3H] cholesterol and 2 mg/ml BSA. The radioactivity was measured by scintillation counting. Cholesterol efflux to apoAI from foam cells was increased in LA and EPA groups. PUFAs had no effect on cholesterol efflux to HDL from foam cells. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). ※P < 0.05 vs. control.
Figure 5Effects of PUFAs on the mRNA expressions of PPARγ transcriptional regulated proteins during THP-1 macrophage-derived foam cell formation. The THP-1 macrophages were pre-treated with different NEFA in advance, and then ox-LDL was added to facilitate foam cell formation. Total RNAs were extracted from both macrophages and foam cells and reverse-transcribed into cDNA. PPARγ, SR-A1, CD36, ABCA1 and apoAI were measured by real-time PCR. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). ※P < 0.05 vs. the value in macrophages; †P < 0.05 vs. the un-treated control.
Specific NEFA induced fold-changes of mRNAs
| SR-A1 | -0.25 | -0.61* | 1.12* | -1.30*# | -0.96*# |
| CD36 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.26 | -1.03* | -0.67* |
| ABCA1 | 2.15 | -0.36 | -0.26 | 0.11 | 1.20* |
| ApoAI | 1.15 | 2.82* | -4.73* | 3.02*# | 5.24*# |
| PPARγ | 0.18 | 1.30*# | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.48* |
| Cidea | 0.02 | -1.54* | -3.87* | 3.17*# | 1.02# |
| Cideb | 1.35 | 2.43* | 1.67* | 0.28# | 0.17# |
| Cidec | 0.65 | -0.24 | -0.27 | 0.84# | 1.75*# |
| Perilipin | -0.15 | -2.11* | -3.04* | 2.42* | -0.24 |
| ADRP | 4.05 | 5.22* | 4.36* | 9.55*# | 7.78*# |
| TIP47 | 0.99 | 1.39* | 0.54* | -1.79* | 2.04*# |
| S3-12 | 0.38 | 2.10* | -2.80* | 6.30*# | 3.21*# |
| LSDP5 | 1.03 | 1.60* | -2.02* | 2.96*# | 0.10 |
Values were presented as: log2 (mRNA level in foam cell/mRNA level in macrophage).
(*P < 0.05; #P < 0.05 vs. respective control).
Figure 6Effects of PUFAs on the mRNA expressions of CIDE and PAT members during NEFA-induced LD formation. The THP-1 macrophages were pre-treated with different NEFA in advance, and then ox-LDL was added to facilitate foam cells formation. Total RNAs were extracted from both macrophages and foam cells and reverse-transcribed into cDNA. CIDE (A) and PAT (B) family members were measured by real-time PCR. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). ※P < 0.05 vs. the value in macrophages; †P < 0.05 vs. the un-treated control.
Real-time PCR primer sequences
| Forward: CCAGGGACATGGGAATGCAA | NM_138715.2 | |
| Reverse: CCAGTGGGACCTCGATCTCC | ||
| Forward: GAGAACTGTTATGGGGCTAT | NM_001001548.2 | |
| Reverse: TTCAACTGGAGAGGCAAAGG | ||
| Forward: GCACTGAGGAAGATGCTGAAA | NM_005502.2 | |
| Reverse: AGTTCCTGGAAGGTCTT GTTC | ||
| Forward: TGTGTCCCAGTTTGAAGGC | NM_000039.1 | |
| Reverse: CTCCTTTTCCAGGTTATCCCAG | ||
| Forward: CACAAGAACAGATCCAGTGGTTGCAG | NM_005037.5 | |
| Reverse: AATAATAAGGTGGAGATGCAGGCTCC | ||
| Forward: GGGATCACAGACTAAGCGAG | NM_001279.3 | |
| Reverse: TGACGAGGGCATCCAGAG | ||
| Forward: TGATGGTGTTGCAGTCTGG | NM_014430.2 | |
| Reverse: AAAGAGGTCTCGAGGGTTTTG | ||
| Forward: TTGATGTGGCCCGTGTAACGTTTG | NM_022094.2 | |
| Reverse: AAGCTTCCTTCATGATGCGCTTGG | ||
| Forward: GCCATGTCCCTATCAGATGC | NM_001145311.1 | |
| Reverse: GTTGTCGATGTCCCGGAATT | ||
| Forward: CTGAGCACATCGAGTCACATACTCT | NM_001122.2 | |
| Reverse: GGAGCGTCTGGCATGTAGTGT | ||
| Forward: GCTGGACAAGTTGGAGGAGA | NM_001164189.1 | |
| Reverse: CCGACACCTTAGACGACACA | ||
| Forward: ACATCTTCCACCCCATGAATG | NM_001080400.1 | |
| Reverse: GTGTTCAAATGCCCGCTG | ||
| Forward: AGCACGATGTCTGAAGAAGAG | DQ_839131.1 | |
| Reverse: TCCTTGGCTGCACTGTAAAC | ||
| Forward: TGACACTGGCAAAACAATGCA | NM_005502.2 | |
| Reverse: GGTCCTTTTCACCAGCAAGCT |