Literature DB >> 23878281

Liver fibrosis: histopathologic and biochemical influences on diagnostic efficacy of hepatobiliary contrast-enhanced MR imaging in staging.

Diana Feier1, Csilla Balassy, Nina Bastati, Judith Stift, Radu Badea, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the staging of liver fibrosis in patients with diffuse chronic liver diseases (CLDs) and to investigate the factors that may influence the results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee and waiver of the informed consent requirement, data in 102 patients with histologically proven liver fibrosis (classified according to the METAVIR system) of various underlying causes were retrospectively analyzed. Patients underwent 3.0-T MR imaging with gadoxetic acid. The signal intensity of the liver was defined by using region of interest measurements before contrast material injection and in the hepatobiliary phase (20 minutes after contrast material administration), and relative enhancement was calculated. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to identify variables associated with relative enhancement measurements, and the performance of relative enhancement measurements in the staging of liver fibrosis was assessed by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.
RESULTS: At analysis of the relationship between enhancement measurements and histologic parameters, the relative enhancement values correlated strongly with liver fibrosis stage (r = -0.65, P < .0001) and moderately with necroinflammatory activity grades (r = -0.41, P = .002) and the presence of iron load (r = -0.21, P = .05). In multivariate analysis, only liver fibrosis stage independently influenced relative enhancement values (P < .001). The measurements performed well in the staging of liver fibrosis, with an AUC of 0.81 for stages of F1 or greater, 0.82 for stages of F2 or greater, 0.85 for stages of F3 or greater, and 0.83 for stage F4. Increased aspartate aminotransferase, gammaglutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase levels were independent predictors of false-negative results.
CONCLUSION: The presence of hepatic fibrosis can be assessed with good discrimination by using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, but assessment can be confounded in the setting of abnormal aspartate aminotransferase, gammaglutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase levels. RSNA, 2013

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23878281     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  Can functional parameters from hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate MRI predict clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis?

Authors:  Kumar Sandrasegaran; Enming Cui; Reem Elkady; Pauley Gasparis; Gitasree Borthakur; Mark Tann; Suthat Liangpunsakul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Advances in functional and molecular MRI technologies in chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Iris Y Zhou; Onofrio A Catalano; Peter Caravan
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver in the era of gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Francesco Agnello; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Dario Picone; Federica Vernuccio; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Lydia Giannitrapani; Adele Taibbi; Antonino Agrusa; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Galia; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative liver MR imaging with diffusion-weighted, SWI, and hepato-specific contrast-enhanced sequences in staging liver fibrosis--a multiparametric approach.

Authors:  Diana Feier; Csilla Balassy; Nina Bastati; Romana Fragner; Friedrich Wrba; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  CT and MR perfusion techniques to assess diffuse liver disease.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Benjamin Leporq; Bernard E Van Beers; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

Review 6.  Imaging of Hepatic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Rishi Philip Mathew; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-08-29

7.  Native T1 mapping compared to ultrasound elastography for staging and monitoring liver fibrosis: an animal study of repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy.

Authors:  Jinning Li; Huanhuan Liu; Caiyuan Zhang; Shuyan Yang; Yanshu Wang; Weibo Chen; Xin Li; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of intracellular uptake rates calculated using dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for hepatic fibrosis stage.

Authors:  Krishna Juluru; Andrew H Talal; Rhonda K Yantiss; Pascal Spincemaille; Elizabeth K Weidman; Ashley E Giambrone; Sadaf Jalili; Steven P Sourbron; Jonathan P Dyke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Noninvasive diagnosis of cirrhosis: a review of different imaging modalities.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Mirko D'Onofrio; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Crosara; Stefano Canestrini; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Novel Imaging Diagnosis for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Consensus from the 5th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE 2014).

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Takamichi Murakami; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Michiie Sakamoto; Osamu Matsui; Byung-Ihn Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Ren-Jie Yang; Meng-Su Zeng; Ran-Chou Chen; Ja-Der Liang
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 11.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.