Kimberly Munro1, Catherine Jarvis2, Ling Yuan Kong3, Vinita D'Souza4, Lisa Graves5. 1. Université de Montréal, Montreal QC. 2. CLSC Côte-des-neiges, Montreal QC; Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal QC. 3. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal QC. 4. Herzl Family Practice Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal QC. 5. Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury ON.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: No official provisions are made for the medically uninsured under provincial public health programs in Canada. Studies have shown that uninsured pregnant women have inadequate access to prenatal and obstetrical services that favour healthy maternal and child outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of family physicians who provided care to uninsured pregnant women. METHODS: Eight family physicians affiliated with two Montreal-based primary-care clinics and one tertiary care hospital between 2004 and 2007 were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were assessed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Uninsured pregnant patients were characterized by physicians as socially vulnerable, with precarious immigration status that limited their access to health services. Uninsured patients were thought not to benefit from the same standard of perinatal care as their insured counterparts. Care of uninsured women was generally thought to be a professional obligation, regardless of the woman's ability to pay. Caring for this population was considered by family physicians to be challenging, engendering psychological stress, increased workload, and occasional tensions with other health care providers. CONCLUSION: In the present context, family physicians are left to negotiate the health care system in an attempt to provide adequate perinatal care for uninsured pregnant patients. This situation has repercussions for physicians, for patients and, ultimately, for infants. Leadership is required to ensure that all pregnant women in Canada have access to appropriate health care during the perinatal period.
OBJECTIVE: No official provisions are made for the medically uninsured under provincial public health programs in Canada. Studies have shown that uninsured pregnant women have inadequate access to prenatal and obstetrical services that favour healthy maternal and child outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of family physicians who provided care to uninsured pregnant women. METHODS: Eight family physicians affiliated with two Montreal-based primary-care clinics and one tertiary care hospital between 2004 and 2007 were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were assessed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Uninsured pregnant patients were characterized by physicians as socially vulnerable, with precarious immigration status that limited their access to health services. Uninsured patients were thought not to benefit from the same standard of perinatal care as their insured counterparts. Care of uninsured women was generally thought to be a professional obligation, regardless of the woman's ability to pay. Caring for this population was considered by family physicians to be challenging, engendering psychological stress, increased workload, and occasional tensions with other health care providers. CONCLUSION: In the present context, family physicians are left to negotiate the health care system in an attempt to provide adequate perinatal care for uninsured pregnant patients. This situation has repercussions for physicians, for patients and, ultimately, for infants. Leadership is required to ensure that all pregnant women in Canada have access to appropriate health care during the perinatal period.
Entities:
Keywords:
family physicians; medically uninsured; pregnancy; qualitative study
Authors: Anna Dion; Alessandro Carini-Gutierrez; Vania Jimenez; Amal Ben Ameur; Emilie Robert; Lawrence Joseph; Neil Andersson Journal: J Mix Methods Res Date: 2021-10-13
Authors: Rapeepong Suphanchaimat; Nareerut Pudpong; Phusit Prakongsai; Weerasak Putthasri; Johanna Hanefeld; Anne Mills Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Fiona Leh Hoon Chuah; Sok Teng Tan; Jason Yeo; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390