| Literature DB >> 23874992 |
Jiguang Wei1, Caihong Li, Yong Li, Gaoming Jiang, Guanglei Cheng, Yanhai Zheng.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drought is a common stress limiting crops growth and productivities worldwide. Water deficit may increase cellular membrane permeability, resulting in K outflow. Internal K starvation may disorder plant metabolism and limit plant growth. However, it is seldom reported about the effects of external K on drought tolerance of contrasting wheat cultivars. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23874992 PMCID: PMC3707864 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Effects of exogenous K2CO3 on light-saturated net photosynthetic rate (A sat) and stomatal conductance (g s) in SN16 and JM22 under different water treatments.
(A, C) Plants are in well-watered condition. (B, D) Plants are in 20% PEG6000-stressed condition. Vertical bars denote SE (n =6). Different letters indicate significant at p ≤0.05.
Effects of external K2CO3 on shoot/root K+ content of drought-tolerant SN16 and intolerant JM22 under well-watered and PEG6000-stressed conditions.
| Treatment | K+ content in SN16 | K+ content in JM22 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEG-6000 (w/v) | K2CO3 (mM) | Shoot (mg g-1 DM) | Root (mg g-1 DM) | Shoot (mg g-1 DM) | Root (mg g-1 DM) | ||
| 0 | 0 | 43.2±0.7b | 16.8±0.9d | 40.7±0.8c | 15.7±0.5d | ||
| 2.5 | 43.1±1.1b | 21.8±0.7c | 47.9±0.9b | 20.4±0.7c | |||
| 5.0 | 43.5±0.9b | 23.9±0.8b | 51.1±1.2a | 22.8±0.8b | |||
| 7.5 | 44.7±0.3a | 25.8±0.6a | 52.5±1.3a | 26.6±0.9a | |||
| 10.0 | 47.0±1.4a | 26.1±0.7a | 53.5±1.4a | 27.2±0.9a | |||
| 20% | 0 | 24.8±1.2b | 8.9±0.2e | 21.9±0.7c | 8.7±0.1d | ||
| 2.5 | 28.5±2.1a | 9.7±0.3d | 24.5±0.8b | 9.2±0.2c | |||
| 5.0 | 29.6±1.5a | 10.5±0.3c | 25.0±0.6a | 10.0±0.2b | |||
| 7.5 | 30.6±1.1a | 10.8±0.4b | 25.8±0.5a | 11.2±0.4a | |||
| 10.0 | 30.0±1.7a | 11.7±0.3a | 23.0±0.6b | 11.7±0.6a |
Significance analyses of data were performed using ANOVA analysis in SPSS package (Ver. 11, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Within each column, means followed by different letter are significantly changed at p ≤0.05
Figure 2Effects of K2CO3 application on leaf water potential (Ψ l) and Chlorophyll (Chl) contents in SN16 and JM22 under different water treatments.
(A, C) Plants are in well-watered condition. (B, D) Plants are in 20% PEG6000-stressed condition. Vertical bars denote SE (n =6). Different letters indicate significant at p ≤0.05.
Figure 3Effects of exogenous K2CO3 on electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in SN16 and JM22 under different water treatments.
(A, C) Plants treated with 0% PEG6000. (B, D) Plants treated with 20% PEG6000. Vertical bars denote SE (n =6). Different letters indicate significant at p ≤0.05.
Figure 4Effects of exogenous K2CO3 on superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities in SN16 and JM22 under different water treatments.
(A, C, E) Plants treated with 0% PEG6000. (B, D, F) Plants treated with 20% PEG6000. Vertical bars denote SE (n =6). Different letters indicate significant at p ≤0.05.
Figure 5The expression levels of antioxidant enzymes related genes (SOD (A), CAT (B), APX (C) and GPX (D)) in SN16 and JM22 under different K2CO3 and PEG6000 treatments.
Data are mean ± SE (n =3).
Effects of external K2CO3 on shoot/root dry masses of drought-tolerant SN16 and intolerant JM22 under well-watered and PEG6000-stressed conditions.
| Treatment | Shoot | Root | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | PEG6000 (w/v) | K2CO3 (mM) | Plant height (cm) | Dry mass (mg) | Root length (cm) | Dry mass (mg) | ||
| SN16 | 0 | 0 | 21.45±0.63b | 0.31±0.03b | 9.33±0.43a | 0.11±0.00b | ||
| 2.5 | 23.45±0.93a | 0.38±0.03a | 10.02±0.92a | 0.15±0.02a | ||||
| 5.0 | 23.14±1.02a | 0.36±0.02a | 9.43±0.63a | 0.14±0.03a | ||||
| 7.5 | 22.02±0.82b | 0.32±0.02b | 9.41±0.71a | 0.13±0.01a | ||||
| 10.0 | 20.27±0.72c | 0.27±0.02c | 9.28±0.52a | 0.10±0.01b | ||||
| 20% | 0 | 17.21±0.43b | 0.22±0.03b | 7.92±0.53b | 0.09±0.00b | |||
| 2.5 | 17.83±0.52b | 0.24±0.02b | 8.21±0.72b | 0.11±0.01a | ||||
| 5.0 | 19.31±0.71a | 0.29±0.02a | 9.37±0.43a | 0.13±0.02a | ||||
| 7.5 | 20.01±0.93a | 0.31±0.03a | 9.39±0.63a | 0.12±0.02a | ||||
| 10.0 | 19.26±1.03a | 0.26±0.02b | 7.77±0.32b | 0.10±0.01b | ||||
| JM22 | 0 | 0 | 22.28±0.72b | 0.28±0.02a | 8.22±0.33b | 0.08±0.00b | ||
| 2.5 | 23.92±0.64a | 0.29±0.04a | 9.21±0.73a | 0.13±0.02a | ||||
| 5.0 | 22.79±0.83b | 0.29±0.02a | 9.02±0.42a | 0.12±0.02a | ||||
| 7.5 | 21.28±1.03b | 0.27±0.03a | 8.59±0.62b | 0.11±0.01a | ||||
| 10.0 | 17.28±1.12c | 0.23±0.03b | 7.29±0.93c | 0.06±0.01c | ||||
| 20% | 0 | 13.21±0.54b | 0.19±0.04b | 5.09±0.34b | 0.07±0.00b | |||
| 2.5 | 14.10±0.63b | 0.21±0.01b | 5.28±0.56b | 0.07±0.01b | ||||
| 5.0 | 14.76±0.82a | 0.26±0.02a | 6.35±0.32a | 0.09±0.01a | ||||
| 7.5 | 14.15±0.55a | 0.26±0.05a | 6.12±0.55a | 0.11±0.02a | ||||
| 10.0 | 11.35±0.86c | 0.23±0.06b | 5.01±0.37b | 0.08±0.01b |
Significance analyses of data were performed using ANOVA analysis in SPSS package (Ver. 11, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Within each column, means followed by different letter are significantly changed at p ≤0.05
Effects (P-values) of cultivar, PEG6000, K2CO3 and their interactions on plant physiological and biochemical parameters of winter wheat analyzed using three-way (cultivar, PEG6000 and K2CO3 as the fixed factors) general linear model in SPSS (Ver. 11, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
| Parameters | Cultivars(Cv) | PEG6000(P) | K2CO3(K) | Cv×P | Cv×K | P×K | Cv×P×K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Root length |
|
|
|
| 0.914 | 0.840 | 0.786 |
| Shoot mass | 0.477 |
|
|
| 0.964 |
|
|
| Root mass |
|
|
|
| 0.392 |
| 0.398 |
|
| 0.062 |
|
|
| 0.263 |
|
|
|
| 0.356 |
|
|
| 0.114 |
| 0.127 |
| Shoot K+ | 0.379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MDA |
|
|
|
| 0.341 |
| 0.522 |
| SOD |
|
|
| 0.916 |
|
|
|
| POD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CAT |
|
|
| 0.173 | 0.102 |
|
|
A sat, light-saturated photosynthetic rate; g s, stamotal conductance; Chl, chlorophyll; EL, electrolyte leakage; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase. The bold numerals highlight the significance at p ≤0.05.