| Literature DB >> 31220144 |
Bénédicte Favreau1,2, Marie Denis1,2, Raphael Ployet3, Fabien Mounet3, Hana Peireira da Silva4, Livia Franceschini4, Jean-Paul Laclau5, Carlos Labate4, Helaine Carrer6.
Abstract
While potassium fertilization increases growth yield in Brazilian eucalyptus plantations, it could also increase water requirements, making trees more vulnerable to drought. Sodium fertilization, which has been shown to promote eucalyptus growth compared to K-deficient trees, could partially mitigate this adverse effect of potassium. However, little is known about the influence of K and Na fertilization on the tree metabolic response to water deficit. The aim of the present study was thus to analyze the transcriptome of leaves sampled from Eucalyptus grandis trees subjected to 37% rainfall reduction, and fertilized with potassium (K), sodium (Na), compared to control trees (C). The multifactorial experiment was set up in a field with a throughfall exclusion system. Transcriptomic analysis was performed on leaves from two-year-old trees, and data analyzed using multifactorial statistical analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Significant sets of genes were seen to respond to rainfall reduction, in interaction with K or Na fertilization, or to fertilization only (regardless of the water supply regime). The genes were involved in stress signaling, primary and secondary metabolism, secondary cell wall formation and photosynthetic activity. Our focus on key genes related to cation transporters and aquaporins highlighted specific regulation of ion homeostasis, and plant adjustment to water deficit. While water availability significantly affects the transcriptomic response of eucalyptus species, this study points out that the transcriptomic response is highly dependent on the fertilization regime. Our study is based on the first large-scale field trial in a tropical region, specifically designed to study the interaction between water availability and nutrition in eucalyptus. To our knowledge, this is the first global transcriptomic analysis to compare the influence of K and Na fertilization on tree adaptive traits in water deficit conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31220144 PMCID: PMC6586347 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of K and Na transporters, and aquaporins.
| Family | Gene ID | Gene name | Log2Fold rainfall reduction | Log2Fold fertilization | At orthologs | Reference | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | Na | C | KvsC | KvsNa | NavsC | |||||||
| K channels | Shaker type | Eucgr.C01105 | Voltage-gated potassium channel (AKT1) | ns | ns | ns | -0.87*** | -0.87*** | ns | AT2G26650 | [ | |
| Eucgr.L01971 | Potassium outward rectifier channel (SKOR) | 0.75** | ns | 0.54* | 0.50** | 0.39* | ns | AT3G02850 | [ | |||
| Two-pore K channels | Eucgr.F03693 | Outward rectifying potassium channel protein (TPK1) | -0.35* | -0.42* | -0.47*** | ns | ns | ns | AT5G55630 | [ | ||
| Eucgr.K01218 | Outward rectifying potassium channel protein (TPK3) | ns | ns | -0.35* | ns | ns | ns | AT4G18160 | [ | |||
| K transporters | KUP/HAK/KT transporters | Eucgr.B03948 | Putative potassium transporter (KUP12) | 0.33** | 0.26* | ns | ns | ns | ns | AT1G60160 | [ | |
| Eucgr.B03949 | Putative potassium transporter (KUP6) | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.37** | ns | AT1G70300 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.E04300 | Putative potassium transporter (KUP11) | ns | -0.39* | -0.55*** | ns | ns | ns | AT2G35060 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.E04301 | Putative potassium transporter (KUP10) | ns | ns | -0.37* | ns | 0.29* | ns | AT1G31120 | [ | |||
| Putative potassium/proton antiporter | Eucgr.A02869 | Potassium efflux antiporter (KEA5) | -0.39** | ns | -0.39*** | ns | ns | ns | AT5G51710 | [ | ||
| Eucgr.G01108 | Putative potassium efflux antiporter (KEA3) | ns | ns | -0.39* | ns | ns | ns | AT4G04850 | [ | |||
| Non selective cation channel (NSCCs) | Cyclic Nucleotide Gate Channels | Eucgr.A01488 | Putative cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC1) | ns | ns | ns | -0.33*** | ns | ns | AT5G53130 | [ | |
| Eucgr.C02008 | Putative cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC14) | ns | ns | ns | 0.39* | 0.31* | ns | AT2G24610 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.F03358 | Putative cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC4) | ns | ns | ns | -0.46*** | -0.34* | ns | AT5G54250 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.H00600 | Putative cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC20) | ns | ns | ns | -0.42** | ns | ns | AT3G17700 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.I01988 | Putative cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC2) | ns | ns | ns | -0.29* | ns | -0.46** | AT5G15410 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.K01241 | Putative cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNGC15) | -0.71* | ns | -1.07*** | ns | ns | ns | AT2G28260 | [ | |||
| Glutamate-gated receptor | Eucgr.C01861 | Putative glutamate receptor (GLR2) | 0.93* | ns | 0.99** | ns | ns | ns | AT2G29120 | [ | ||
| Eucgr.C02006 | Putative glutamate receptor (GLR2) | ns | ns | ns | -0.48** | -0.45** | ns | AT2G29120 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.I01532 | Putative glutamate receptor (GLR3) | ns | ns | ns | -0.59** | ns | ns | AT4G35290 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.I02216 | Putative glutamate receptor (GLR3) | 0.45* | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | AT3G51480 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.K00799 | Putative glutamate receptor (GLR3) | 0.46* | ns | -0.38* | ns | ns | ns | AT1G05200 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.L03706 | Putative glutamate receptor (GLR2) | 0.90* | ns | 1.03** | ns | ns | ns | AT4G31710 | [ | |||
| Na transporter | HKT transporter | Eucgr.C02181 | Sodium transporter (HKT1) | ns | ns | ns | -0.36** | -0.43*** | ns | AT4G10310 | [ | |
| Sodium/proton exchanger | Eucgr.B01758 | Sodium/H+ exchanger (NHX2) | ns | ns | -0.48** | ns | ns | ns | AT3G05030 | [ | ||
| Eucgr.D00309 | Putative cation/H+ exchanger (CHX4) | -0.90* | ns | -0.80* | ns | ns | ns | AT3G44900 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.E04240 | Sodium/H+ exchanger (NHX6) | ns | ns | -0.38** | ns | ns | ns | AT1G79610 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.H04454 | Sodium/H+ exchanger (NHX2) | ns | ns | ns | 0.48*** | 0.48*** | ns | AT3G05030 | [ | |||
| Cation/proton exchanger | Eucgr.A00502 | Cation/H+ exchanger (CAX3) | ns | ns | ns | -0.50* | ns | -0.54* | AT3G51860 | [ | ||
| Eucgr.A02141 | Cation/H+ exchanger (CAX1) | ns | ns | ns | -0.77*** | -0.79*** | ns | AT5G17860 | [ | |||
| Water channel | Aquaporins | Eucgr.A01153 | Aquaporin PIP1-3/PIP1-4 | ns | ns | 0.48*** | -0.61*** | -0.63*** | ns | AT2G37170 | [ | |
| Eucgr.A02176 | Aquaporin SIP2-1 | ns | ns | -0.52*** | ns | ns | ns | AT3G56950 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.D00421 | Aquaporin NIP1-1 | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.62*** | -0.68*** | AT4G18910 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.F03054 | Probable aquaporin TIP-type | ns | ns | ns | -0.31* | -0.35** | ns | AT3G16240 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.G03037 | Aquaporin PIP1-3/PIP1-4 | ns | ns | -0.41** | ns | ns | ns | AT4G00430 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.I01369 | Aquaporin PIP2 | -0.47* | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | AT4G00430 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.J00930 | Aquaporin PIP1-3/PIP1-4 | ns | -0.50** | 0.44*** | ns | 0.70*** | -0.47** | AT5G60660 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.J01087 | Aquaporin PIP2 | -0.55** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | AT3G54820 | [ | |||
| Eucgr.J01345 | Aquaporin NIP2 | -0.78* | ns | ns | 0.55* | 0.62** | ns | AT5G37820 | [ | |||
Fig 1Effect of a 37% reduction in rainfall and K and Na fertilization regimes on soil water content and eucalyptus physiological parameters.
Mean soil water content (in the 0.15 to 6 m soil layer), 22 to 25 months after planting. The leaf sampling date, at two years of age, is represented by a red arrow (A). Measurements on two-year-old trees of mean tree height (B), leaf area (C), predawn leaf water potential (D), midday stomatal conductance gs (E) and CO2 assimilation rate (F) measured on two-month-old leaves. Dark gray = full rainfall; Light gray = reduced rainfall.
Fig 2Selection of significant genes.
(A) Flowchart showing the data selection process. (B) PLS-DA of 4,885 Multifactor DEGs on the first two components.
Fig 3Representation of the 10 network modules and corresponding bar plots representing the gene expression level for each treatment, with four replicates per treatment.
The number of genes (n), the most significant R correlation values (Cor > 0.70 and pval > 0.05) and the corresponding level of significance (ns > 0.05; *< 0.01; **< 0.001; ***< 0.0001) per treatment are given for each module. Gene expression was significantly affected by reduced rainfall (RR = Cyan, Magenta, Red, Lightcyan, Green), potassium and reduced rainfall (K and RR = Lightcyan, Purple), control and full rainfall (C and FR = Tan, Green), potassium (K = Blue, Brown, Purple), sodium (Na = GreenYellow), control (C = Brown).
Fig 4Venn diagram of Rainfall DEGs.
Fig 5Enrichment map of genes expressed under the Reduced Rainfall treatment with no fertilization (A), with K fertilization (B), with Na fertilization (C). The map includes nodes representing GO enriched gene sets connected by their edges, representing similarity between two gene sets. Nodes belonging to very similar biological processes were clustered and labeled with a summarized name. For each cluster, the heatmap of up- and down-expressed genes in response to RR is shown. Enrichment significance (p-value) is conveyed by the node color in the corresponding up and down-expressed genes; enrichment significance (p-value) is conveyed by the size of the node, which is proportional to the number of up-and down-expressed genes; the edge thickness is proportional to the degree of similarity between two nodes. HeatMap: the color represents positive and negative log2 fold changes in gene expression.
Fig 6Enrichment map of network modules positively (+) or negatively (-) correlated with treatments (pval < 0.05; R > 0.7).
(A) Purple = K and RR and K (+); (B) Lightcyan = K and RR (+); (C) Brown = C (+), K (-); (D) Blue = K (+); (E) GreenYellow = Na (+). Node = GO enrichment of gene set; Node size is proportional to significance (p-value); Edge is the overlap between two connected gene sets; Edge thickness is proportional to the amount of overlap.
Fig 7Eucalyptus grandis leaf response to water deficit and K and Na fertilization.