There are two schools of thought regarding the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoform active in the vasculature. Using urinary prostacyclin markers some groups have proposed that vascular COX-2 drives prostacyclin release. In contrast, we and others have found that COX-1, not COX-2, is responsible for vascular prostacyclin production. Our experiments have relied on immunoassays to detect the prostacyclin breakdown product, 6-keto-PGF1α and antibodies to detect COX-2 protein. Whilst these are standard approaches, used by many laboratories, antibody-based techniques are inherently indirect and have been criticized as limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. To address this question, we measured production of prostanoids, including 6-keto-PGF1α, by isolated vessels and in the circulation in vivo using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and found values essentially identical to those obtained by immunoassay. In addition, we determined expression from the Cox2 gene using a knockin reporter mouse in which luciferase activity reflects Cox2 gene expression. Using this we confirm the aorta to be essentially devoid of Cox2 driven expression. In contrast, thymus, renal medulla, and regions of the brain and gut expressed substantial levels of luciferase activity, which correlated well with COX-2-dependent prostanoid production. These data are consistent with the conclusion that COX-1 drives vascular prostacyclin release and puts the sparse expression of Cox2 in the vasculature in the context of the rest of the body. In doing so, we have identified the thymus, gut, brain and other tissues as target organs for consideration in developing a new understanding of how COX-2 protects the cardiovascular system.
There are two schools of thought regarding the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoform active in the vasculature. Using urinary prostacyclin markers some groups have proposed that vascular COX-2 drives prostacyclin release. In contrast, we and others have found that COX-1, not COX-2, is responsible for vascular prostacyclin production. Our experiments have relied on immunoassays to detect the prostacyclin breakdown product, 6-keto-PGF1α and antibodies to detect COX-2 protein. Whilst these are standard approaches, used by many laboratories, antibody-based techniques are inherently indirect and have been criticized as limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. To address this question, we measured production of prostanoids, including 6-keto-PGF1α, by isolated vessels and in the circulation in vivo using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and found values essentially identical to those obtained by immunoassay. In addition, we determined expression from the Cox2 gene using a knockin reporter mouse in which luciferase activity reflects Cox2 gene expression. Using this we confirm the aorta to be essentially devoid of Cox2 driven expression. In contrast, thymus, renal medulla, and regions of the brain and gut expressed substantial levels of luciferase activity, which correlated well with COX-2-dependent prostanoid production. These data are consistent with the conclusion that COX-1 drives vascular prostacyclin release and puts the sparse expression of Cox2 in the vasculature in the context of the rest of the body. In doing so, we have identified the thymus, gut, brain and other tissues as target organs for consideration in developing a new understanding of how COX-2 protects the cardiovascular system.
Prostacyclin, a powerful cardioprotective hormone released by the vascular
endothelium, inhibits platelet activation, vascular remodeling and atherosclerosis.
Consequently, inhibition of prostacyclin release has been associated with an
increased risk of heart attacks and strokes [1]. Prostacyclin production results from the consecutive actions first of
cyclooxygenase (COX), which converts arachidonic acid to prostaglandin (PG)
H2, the precursor of all prostanoids, followed by the action of
prostacyclin synthase, which isomerizes PGH2 to mature prostacyclin.Two COX isoforms exist; COX-1 and COX-2 [2-4]. COX-1 is expressed
constitutively in many tissues [5,6]. COX-2 expression, in contrast, is normally
sparse in most tissues but is rapidly upregulated by mitogens, cytokines and other
stimuli; COX-2 dependent prostanoids contribute to cell proliferation, pain and
inflammatory responses [7,8]. Traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen and diclofenac inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2
isoforms. Much of the analgesic and anti-inflammatory benefit of these agents is
derived from inhibition of COX-2, whilst concurrent inhibition of COX-1 produces
unwanted and potentially life threatening gastrointestinal side effects [9]. Consequently, new COX-2 selective agents
such as celecoxib (CelebrexTM) and rofecoxib (VioxxTM) have a
reduced incidence of gastrointestinal side effects, while retaining
anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy [10]. It is now clear that both traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 selective
inhibitors are also associated with a small but definite increase in the risk of
atherothrombotic events in man [11],
particularly myocardial infarction. These clinical data are consistent with data
from animal models demonstrating that either global Cox2 gene
deletion or global pharmacologic COX-2 enzyme inhibition produce a pro-atherogenic,
pro-thrombotic phenotype [12-15].With regard to the cardiovascular system and particularly the vascular endothelium,
there has been strong debate regarding which COX isoform is predominant and
responsible for prostacyclin production. Opinion is divided, with two opposing
views. It is currently widely held that COX-2 expression and activity predominates
over COX-1 within endothelial cells and consequently is the major driver of vascular
prostacyclin production [1,14-16].
Inhibition of COX-2-dependent production of cardioprotective prostacyclin in the
cardiovascular endothelium has been proposed to explain the increase in
cardiovascular events observed in patients taking both traditional and
COX-2-selective NSAIDs [13,16]. This hypothesis is rooted in studies
showing that urinary excretion of prostacyclin markers are reduced in human
volunteers receiving COX-2 inhibitors [17],
mice that have a global Cox2 gene deletion [5,12], and mice that have
targeted endothelial and/or vascular smooth muscle Cox2 gene
deletions [14]. The suggestion that
inhibition of COX-2-dependent vascular prostacyclin synthesis is responsible for the
increased cardiovascular events is further supported by the atherothrombotic
phenotype of Cox2 [12-14] and prostacyclin receptor [18] knockout mice, consistent with this
hypothesis.Whilst not all investigators find urinary prostacyclin markers to be reduced in
global Cox2 gene knock out mice [19], recent data from our group support this idea [5]. However, we found that urinary markers do not to reflect
prostanoid formation in the vasculature [5],
suggesting instead that they may reflect more localized prostacyclin production,
perhaps in the kidney by blood vessels of the vasa recta, where COX-2 is
constitutively expressed [20]. Thus, in
direct contrast to the commonly accepted hypothesis, work from our group [5] and others [21] demonstrates that COX-1 is the dominant isoform in the vascular
endothelium driving prostacyclin production.Our work and that of others in this area has routinely relied on the use of
immunoassays to detect COX products [22-26] and the use of antibodies to detect COX-1
and COX-2 protein expression in tissues [5,14]. Whilst these techniques to
measure prostanoids and proteins are standard practice, the use of antibodies for
detection of any product is inherently indirect and, as was recently highlighted
[16], open to artifact. Primarily based
on these two objections, our conclusion that COX-1 drives vascular prostacyclin has
been challenged [16].In addition to the above concerns, we note that our previous studies focus on the
role of COX-2 in vascular prostacyclin production; they were not designed to
consider other sites of COX-2 expression, or the effect of loss of COX-2 activity on
prostanoids other than prostacyclin. In the current study we perform new experiments
to directly address these methodological and biological limitations. Firstly, we
validate our conclusions regarding prostanoid production, drawn previously from
immunoassay studies, by employing liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
(LC-MS/MS) to assess lipid mediator release both from isolated vessels and in the
circulation in vivo, profiling the effect of global
Cox2 gene deletion on a range of prostanoid metabolites.
Secondly, we employed a reporter mouse in which the luciferase coding region is
knocked into the Cox2 gene, and is thus under Cox2
gene regulatory control [27], to directly
visualize, quantitate and compare expression from the Cox2 gene in
the regions of the vasculature as well as a panel of other tissues. Use of
Cox2 promoter driven luciferase expression eliminates the
requirement for antibody evaluation of expression from the Cox2
gene. Together these studies support our previous observations that COX-1, not
COX-2, drives prostacyclin release in the vasculature, and provide much needed new
targets for understanding how COX-2 inhibition might regulate cardiovascular
function.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Cox1-/- [28],
Cox2-/- [28] and
Cox2mice [27] were generated as previously described,
and back-crossed onto a C57Bl/6J background. Wild-type mice were generated by
inter-crossing C57Bl/6 back-crossed Cox1+/- and Cox2+/-
mice. All mice used in the study were genotyped before use. Experiments were
performed on male and female mice at 10-12 weeks old. Animal procedures were
conducted in strict accordance with Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and
the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of
the National Institutes of Health. Protocols were subject to local ethical
review and approval by the Imperial College Ethical Review Panel (PPL No.
70/7013) or the UCLA Animal Research Committee (Protocol. No. 1999-066-43;
luciferase imaging experiments only). All surgical procedures and luciferin
treatments were performed under isoflurane anesthesia, taking all appropriate
measures to minimize suffering. Ex vivo and in
vitro experiments were performed on tissue removed from humanely
euthanized animals (see details below).
In vitro COX activity bioassays
Wild-type, Cox1
and
Cox2
were euthanized by
CO2narcosis and the vasculature perfused with PBS. Aortic tissue
and various solid tissues were carefully dissected into small pieces (~2mm rings
for aortic tissue, ~25mm3 for solid organs) and immediately placed
into individual wells of 48 or 96 well microtitre plates containing
Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (50µM; Sigma, UK) in DMEM (+200mM
L-Glutamine; Sigma, UK). Tissues were incubated for 30 mins at 37°C, before
collection of the supernatant to measure prostanoid release by immunoassay or
LC-MS/MS. For studies of relative release by different tissues, prostanoid
release was normalized to tissue wet weight.
Circulating prostanoid measurement in vivo
Under isoflurane anesthesia, the right jugular vein and left carotid artery of
wild-type, Cox1-/- and Cox2-/- mice were cannulated. After
a 20 min stabilization period, bradykinin (100nmol/kg; Tocris Bioscience, UK)
was administered intravenously and 0.8ml arterial blood collected 5 mins later
in to heparin (10U/ml final; Leo Laboratories, UK). After blood collection,
animals were immediately euthanized by cervical dislocation without being
allowed to recover from anaesthetic. Plasma was separated from blood by
centrifugation and the levels of prostanoids measured by LC-MS/MS.
Bioluminescent imaging
Cox2mice were injected
intraperitoneally with D-luciferin (125 mg/kg, Xenogen, USA) under light
isoflurane anesthesia and 15 mins later euthanized by overdose the same
anesthetic. Tissues were rapidly dissected and placed in culture dishes.
Bioluminescent emission was recorded over 3 mins, using the IVIS imaging system
(Xenogen, USA). Collected photon number and images were analyzed using Living
Image software (Xenogen, USA) and quantified as the peak photon release/pixel
detected from each tissue.
Luciferase activity
After bioluminescent imaging, tissues were snap frozen for biochemical
measurement of luciferase activity using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega,
UK). Tissues were dissociated using a Precellys24 bead homogenizer in passive
lysis buffer (Promega, UK) and loaded into white 96 well microtitre plates. The
time-integrated (10 sec) luminescence of each well was then read, 15 secs after
injection of 10X volume of Luciferase Assay Reagent (Promega, UK). Protein
concentration of homogenates was determined using the bicinchoninic acid method
(Perbio, UK) and used to normalize luciferase activity data.
Prostanoid immunoassays
In some experiments, the stable prostacyclin breakdown product
6-keto-PGF1α was measured using either a competitive immunoassay
kit (Cayman Chemical, USA), or where noted and in separate biological samples,
by radioimmunoassay using 6-keto-PGF1α antisera (Sigma, UK) and
[3H] 6-keto-PGF1α (Amersham Biosciences, UK).
PGE2 was measured using a commercially available homogenous
time-resolved fluorescence-based immunoassay (Cisbio, France).
Prostanoid measurement by LC-MS/MS
Prostanoids were extracted and analyzed as previously described [29]. Briefly, 400-500 l sample was mixed
with 3ml ice-cold 15% methanol (v/v) and PGB2-d4 (40
ng) was added as internal standard. The samples were then acidified to pH 3.0
and the prostanoids were semi-purified using solid phase extraction (Phenomenex,
UK). LC-MS/MS of the lipid extract was performed on a triple quadrupole mass
spectrometer equipped with an electrospray probe and coupled to liquid
chromatography (Waters, UK). Analysis of prostanoids was based on MRM assays
using the following transitions: 6-keto PGF1α
m/z 369>163; PGE2
m/z 351>271; 13, 14-dihydro 15-keto
PGE2
m/z 351>333; PGD2:
m/z 351>271; TXB2
m/z 369>169; PGF2
α
m/z 353>193;
PGB2-d4: m/z
337>179. Results are expressed as pg metabolite / ml plasma or culture
medium, using calibration lines constructed with commercially available
prostanoid standards (Cayman Chemicals, USA).
Results and Discussion
Role of COX-1 and/or COX-2 in prostacyclin release by vessels in vitro;
measurement of 6-keto-PGF1α with immunoassays and mass
spectrometry
Prostacyclin was discovered in the 1970s as a profoundly active hormone released
by the blood vessel wall and readily detectable in experiments in which isolated
blood vessels were activated and then mixed with bioassay systems such as
platelets. After the structure of prostacyclin was elucidated, its stable
breakdown products, including 6-keto-PGF1α, were identified.
Antibodies to 6-keto-PGF1α were subsequently raised, and immunoassays
were developed [30].
6-keto-PGF1α immunoassays have since been widely used and have
been instrumental in developing and expanding the field of prostacyclin biology.
However, because they rely on antibody-antigen reactions, results with
immunoassays can be confounded with artifacts, e.g., cross reactivity with
related antigens and matrix interactions [16]. Here we measure vascular 6-keto-PGF1α production
using two different immunoassays, and validate these measurements with mass
spectrometry (Figure 1). In
each case, 6-keto-PGF1α release by isolated aorta was readily
detectable in tissue from wild-type and COX-2-deficient mice, but was
undetectable (<0.2 ng/ml by our LC-MS/MS assay) in tissue from
COX-1-deficient mice (Figure
1). Similarly, release of PGE2,
13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2, PGD2, TXB2 and
PGF2α by aortic rings, measured by LC-MS/MS was in each case
driven by COX-1 (Table 1).
Figure 1
6-keto-PGF1α production in isolated mouse aorta;
measurement by enzyme immunoassay, radio immunoassay, and liquid
chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Prostacyclin release by isolated rings of mouse aorta stimulated with
Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (50µM), measured as the stable
breakdown product 6-keto-PGF1α, was not altered by
Cox2 gene deletion, but was reduced >10-fold by
Cox1 gene deletion. The pattern and level of
6-keto-PGF1α accumulation was similar whether measured by
(a) enzyme immunoassay, (b) radio immunoassay or (c) LC-MS/MS.
Representative LC-MS/MS chromatograms show the presence or absence of
6-keto PGF1α in all sample types (retention time 2.81 min;
transition ion m/z 369>163). n=4-7.
*, p<0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferonni’s post-test.
Table 1
Prostanoid release by isolated aortic rings, measured by
LC-MS/MS.
Mediator
Wild-type
Cox1-/-
Cox2-/-
pg/ml
pg/ml
pg/ml
6-keto-PGF1α
12110 ± 1623
not detectable
10870 ± 1614
PGE2
1217 ± 168
not detectable
1011 ± 200
13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2
40 ± 14
not detectable
39 ± 14
PGD2
385 ± 52
not detectable
316 ± 65
TXB2
443 ± 111
not detectable
406 ± 61
PGF2α
395 ± 62
not detectable
397 ± 63
Prostanoid release from Ca2+ ionophore A23187
(50µM)-stimulated aortic rings, measured by liquid chromatography
tandem mass spectrometry, was almost abolished by
Cox1 gene deletion, but not substantially
altered by Cox2 gene deletion. Both the pattern and
numerical values of 6-keto-PGF1α levels measured by this
method correlate closely with our previous data obtained using
enzyme immunoassay. n=4
6-keto-PGF1α production in isolated mouse aorta;
measurement by enzyme immunoassay, radio immunoassay, and liquid
chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Prostacyclin release by isolated rings of mouse aorta stimulated with
Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (50µM), measured as the stable
breakdown product 6-keto-PGF1α, was not altered by
Cox2 gene deletion, but was reduced >10-fold by
Cox1 gene deletion. The pattern and level of
6-keto-PGF1α accumulation was similar whether measured by
(a) enzyme immunoassay, (b) radio immunoassay or (c) LC-MS/MS.
Representative LC-MS/MS chromatograms show the presence or absence of
6-keto PGF1α in all sample types (retention time 2.81 min;
transition ion m/z 369>163). n=4-7.
*, p<0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferonni’s post-test.Prostanoid release from Ca2+ ionophore A23187
(50µM)-stimulated aortic rings, measured by liquid chromatography
tandem mass spectrometry, was almost abolished by
Cox1 gene deletion, but not substantially
altered by Cox2 gene deletion. Both the pattern and
numerical values of 6-keto-PGF1α levels measured by this
method correlate closely with our previous data obtained using
enzyme immunoassay. n=4Using enzyme immunoassay, we performed additional experiments to confirm that
6-keto-PGF1α production and release was partially dependent upon
an intact endothelium and that the requirement of COX-1 for prostacyclin release
was consistent when vessels were stimulated with a range of biological and
experimental endothelium activators (Table S1). These data are entirely consistent
with what we [5] and others [21] have recently published.Although some recent studies have suggested a role for COX-2 in prostacyclin
production by vascular cells [14] or
vessels [15] in culture, it is important
to point out that COX-2 activity is induced quite rapidly when these biological
samples are placed in culture [5]. For
this reason it is essential that experiments are carried out on fresh vessels
and that observations showing COX-2 expression and activity, after even brief
culture periods, be interpreted with caution.
Role of COX isoforms in eicosanoid generation in vivo; analysis of
circulating 6-keto-PGF1α levels and additional prostanoids by
LC-MS/MS
Measuring markers of prostacyclin release from aortic vessels in
vitro cannot tell us definitively what happens in the circulation
in vivo. We previously demonstrated, using enzyme
immunoassay, that both basal and bradykinin stimulated 6-keto-PGF1α
plasma levels were unaffected by Cox2 gene deletion, but were
greatly reduced by Cox1 gene deletion [5]. Since experimental conditions could selectively
influence the formation of 6-keto-PGF1α [31], we have performed similar experiments and measured a
panel of prostanoids in plasma by LC-MS/MS. Plasma levels of the prostanoids
measured displayed the following rank order:
13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 >> PGE2
≈ 6-keto-PGF1α > TXB2
≈ PGD2 in bradykinin-treated mice (Figure 2). In each case, plasma prostanoid
levels were strongly reduced in Cox1-/- mice, but not altered in
Cox2-/- mice. Plasma 6-keto-PGF1α levels measured here
by LC-MS/MS (Figure 2)
closely matched those we previously reported using enzyme immunoassay
measurement, a correlation recently suggested as necessary [16] to provide critical validation for our
recent work [5].
Figure 2
Bradykinin-stimulated prostanoid accumulation in the circulation
in
vivo in wild-type,
Cox1
, and
Cox2
mice.
Accumulation of the stable prostacyclin breakdown product,
6-keto-PGF1α in plasma after bradykinin administration
(100nmol/kg i.v.) is dependent on COX-1 but not COX-2 when measured by
LC-MS/MS (a). Representative LC-MS/MS chromatograms show the presence or
absence of 6-keto PGF1α in all sample types (retention time
2.81 min; transition ion m/z
369>163). Similar data were obtained for plasma levels of
PGE2 (b), 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 (c),
PGD2 (d), TXB2 (e) and (f) PGF2α.
Plasma 6-keto-PGF1α levels in all genotypes compare well with
those previously published using enzyme immunoassay measurements. n=6.
*, p<0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferonni’s post-hoc test.
Bradykinin-stimulated prostanoid accumulation in the circulation
in
vivo in wild-type,
Cox1
, and
Cox2
mice.
Accumulation of the stable prostacyclin breakdown product,
6-keto-PGF1α in plasma after bradykinin administration
(100nmol/kg i.v.) is dependent on COX-1 but not COX-2 when measured by
LC-MS/MS (a). Representative LC-MS/MS chromatograms show the presence or
absence of 6-keto PGF1α in all sample types (retention time
2.81 min; transition ion m/z
369>163). Similar data were obtained for plasma levels of
PGE2 (b), 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2 (c),
PGD2 (d), TXB2 (e) and (f) PGF2α.
Plasma 6-keto-PGF1α levels in all genotypes compare well with
those previously published using enzyme immunoassay measurements. n=6.
*, p<0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Bonferonni’s post-hoc test.
Tissue mapping both of expression from the Cox2 gene and of COX-2
bioactivity
Data in this paper, as well as previous work from our own [5] and other laboratories [21] firmly establishes COX-1 as the major COX isoform that drives
vascular prostacyclin release in a healthy cardiovascular system. Importantly,
this is also true in atherosclerosis; recent data from our group shows that
COX-1 drives prostacyclin production even in segments of vessels heavily
burdened with atherosclerosis [32].
Nevertheless, whilst COX-2 does not drive prostacyclin production, it clearly
does impact on cardiovascular homeostasis; either inhibition of COX-2 activity
or global Cox2 gene deletion exacerbate atherosclerosis [13,32,33] and thrombosis [12,15] in mice, and the risk of atherothrombotic events is increased in
patients taking drugs that inhibit COX-2 [34]. This conclusion leads to two important questions; (1) ‘if not
in the arterial endothelium, where is COX-2 constitutively expressed?’ and (2)
‘how does COX-2 at sites remote from the vascular wall protect the
cardiovascular system?’ Looking for COX-2 levels in organs and tissues using
traditional immunohistochemical approaches relies on specificity and sensitivity
of antibodies, with all the caveats and objections raised previously [16]. Comparison of COX-2 mRNA levels
suffers from complications due to variability in extraction procedures,
differences in mRNA stability in extracts, and clearly documented differences in
transcription/translation coupling across cell types that results in COX-2 mRNA
levels that do not reflect COX-2 enzyme activity. Here we have used a luciferase
COX-2 reporter mouse (Cox2
)
in which the firefly luciferase coding sequence is knocked into the
Cox2 gene at the start of site of translation of the
endogenous COX-2 protein. Measuring luciferase expression allows rapid and
reproducible visualization and quantitation of expression from the
Cox2 gene in vivo and ex
vivo [27,35,36].Using bioluminescent imaging of tissue dissected from
Cox2mice, we first
performed a systematic analysis of expression in tissues of the cardiovascular
system. We imaged arterial expression in the entire aortic tree, as well as
venous expression in the vena cava (Figure 3). As expected from our previous experiments, where COX-2
protein was measured using traditional antibody approaches [5], we found that the aorta was essentially
devoid of Cox2 gene expression (Figure 3) when compared to brain as a
reference tissue [27]. The exception to
this conclusion was the aortic arch and its branches, where low but detectable
Cox2 gene expression was found. Whilst this is consistent
with the ‘priming’ of NFκB activity [37]
and associated genes in this region of the aorta [38], it is important to put into context what this amount
of Cox2 gene expression actually means in terms of prostacyclin
generation. Work from our previous study showed that prostacyclin release by
mouse aortic arch was driven by COX-1, since activity was lost in arch tissue
from Cox1-/- mice but was unaffected in arch tissue from
Cox2-/- mice [5].
Figure 3
Distribution of luciferin-dependent bioluminescence in cardiovascular
tissue from Cox2
mice.
(a) Quantification of basal expression from the aortic tree, vena cava,
chambers of the heart and, for comparison, brain from
Cox2
mice and (b)
and representative images of bioluminescence. Arteries, veins and
chambers of the heart were essentially devoid of expression from the
Cox2 gene, in comparison with the brain as a
reference tissue. The only exception to this was weak, but detectable,
expression in the region of the aortic arch. n=3.
Distribution of luciferin-dependent bioluminescence in cardiovascular
tissue from Cox2
mice.
(a) Quantification of basal expression from the aortic tree, vena cava,
chambers of the heart and, for comparison, brain from
Cox2mice and (b)
and representative images of bioluminescence. Arteries, veins and
chambers of the heart were essentially devoid of expression from the
Cox2 gene, in comparison with the brain as a
reference tissue. The only exception to this was weak, but detectable,
expression in the region of the aortic arch. n=3.In addition to our observations on arterial and venous luciferase expression in
Cox2mice, we performed
specific sub-structural analysis of Cox2 gene driven luciferase
expression for each chamber of the heart (Figure 3), since conflicting results have
been reported for the requirement for cardiomyocyte COX-2 expression in cardiac
function [39,40]. Cox2 gene expression was also
essentially absent in each of the four chambers of the heart (Figure 3). These data on
Cox2 gene driven luciferase expression in the vasculature
and heart confirm the sparse expression of the Cox2 gene in the
major structures of the cardiovascular system and fit precisely with
immunohistochemistry and COX activity data both in this study and published
recently by our group [5].With the very low to undetectable levels of Cox2 gene expression
in the heart and large vasculature confirmed, we next determined which organs
do demonstrate substantial Cox2 gene
expression under normal homeostatic conditions. To do this we examined
luciferase expression across a bank of organs from
Cox2mice (Figures 4 and 5) and compared results with
those from the aorta. The highest expression level from the
Cox2 gene occurred in the vas deferens (Figure 4), a result consistent
with observations made by antibody-based methods for COX-2 protein
quantification [27]. Substantial
luciferase expression from the Cox2 gene was also observed in
the cerebral cortex, throughout the gastrointestinal tract, the thymus, and the
renal medulla (Figures 4 and
5). Note that expression
in each of these tissues was at least 10-fold greater than that in the
aorta.
Figure 4
Distribution of luciferin-dependent bioluminescence in tissues from
Cox2
mice.
(a) Basal expression from organs of the
Cox2
mice was
visualized by bioluminescent imaging of tissues dissected from
Cox2
reporter
mice after injection of D-luciferin in vivo (125mg/kg i.p.). (b) Imaging
data are expressed as maximum luminescent emission from each tissue.
Basal Cox2 gene driven luciferase expression was
present in many tissues including the vas deferens, brain, intestine,
and thymus but was notably low to absent in the aorta (highlighted with
red circles). Sub-division of the (c) brain, (d) intestine, (e) kidney
and (f) stomach revealed regional expression patterns within each
tissue. n=5.
Figure 5
COX-2-dependent prostanoid production by aorta versus other mouse
tissues in Cox1
mice.
(a) PGE2 formation, normalized to tissue mass, was measured by
immunoassay in supernatants of Ca2+ ionophore A23187
(50µM)-stimulated tissue segments from
Cox1
mice.
Cox1-/- tissues released a variable amount of
PGE2 with low levels in the aorta (highlighted in red),
and substantially higher levels in the thymus, intestines, renal
medulla, brain and vas deferens. This distribution correlates well with
luciferase expression in organs of the
Cox2
mouse,
as described in Figures
3 and 4.
n=6.
Distribution of luciferin-dependent bioluminescence in tissues from
Cox2
mice.
(a) Basal expression from organs of the
Cox2mice was
visualized by bioluminescent imaging of tissues dissected from
Cox2
reporter
mice after injection of D-luciferin in vivo (125mg/kg i.p.). (b) Imaging
data are expressed as maximum luminescent emission from each tissue.
Basal Cox2 gene driven luciferase expression was
present in many tissues including the vas deferens, brain, intestine,
and thymus but was notably low to absent in the aorta (highlighted with
red circles). Sub-division of the (c) brain, (d) intestine, (e) kidney
and (f) stomach revealed regional expression patterns within each
tissue. n=5.
COX-2-dependent prostanoid production by aorta versus other mouse
tissues in Cox1
mice.
(a) PGE2 formation, normalized to tissue mass, was measured by
immunoassay in supernatants of Ca2+ ionophore A23187
(50µM)-stimulated tissue segments from
Cox1mice.
Cox1-/- tissues released a variable amount of
PGE2 with low levels in the aorta (highlighted in red),
and substantially higher levels in the thymus, intestines, renal
medulla, brain and vas deferens. This distribution correlates well with
luciferase expression in organs of the
Cox2mouse,
as described in Figures
3 and 4.
n=6.“Quantification” of luciferase activity by optical imaging of excised organs is
only semiquantitative, because of light absorption by tissue, light scatter, and
variability of luciferin substrate availability in vivo.
However, precise quantification can be obtained by preparing tissue extracts and
measuring light emission in saturating amounts of luciferin substrate.
Quantification of luciferase activity in tissue homogenates from the
Cox2mouse evaluated in
Figure 4 reflected the
same general pattern and activity of luciferase expression observed by optical
imaging (Figure
S1). Once again, in the context of this report, luciferase expression
from the Cox2 gene was essentially undetectable in the
aorta.In separate experiments we compared levels of Ca2+
ionophore-stimulated PGE2 release from tissue segments of
Cox1-/- mice, using PGE2 release as a first
approximation of the relative COX-2 enzymatic activities in these tissues (Figure 5). COX-2-dependent
PGE2 formation closely correlated with the pattern of luciferase
expression in tissues from
Cox2mice. COX-2 activity
was highest in the thymus, gut, brain and vas deferens. However, consistent with
the data in Figure 1,
PGE2 was almost completely absent in the aorta. Comparison data
for PGE2 production in tissues from wild-type and
Cox2mice are shown in Figure S2.
Readers should note the difference in the scales for PGE2 values in
Figure 5 versus Figure
S2.
Summary and Conclusions
Circulating prostacyclin (6-keto-PGF1α) and other prostanoids can be
detected in mouse plasma using LC-MS/MS after bradykinin activation of the
endothelium. The production of prostanoids found in the systemic circulation is
driven overwhelmingly by COX-1 and not COX-2. The levels of
6-keto-PGF1α measured by LC-MS/MS directly correlate with those
we have previously observed by immunoassay, validating our previous observations
and providing additional evidence for the absence of extensive COX-2-dependent
prostacyclin formation in the circulation in vivo. In
agreement, studies using Cox2
reporter mice clearly demonstrate the absence of Cox2 gene
expression in blood vessels, but provide evidence for relatively high levels of
constitutive COX-2 expression elsewhere, such as the thymus, brain, kidney and
gastrointestinal tract. Taken together, these data not only provide additional
confirmation for the absence of COX-2 expression and activity in the
vasculature, but provide a systematic analysis of the distribution of
Cox2 gene expression throughout the body. We should now
look more closely into the role of COX-2 expressed outside major blood vessels
in explaining the adverse cardiovascular effects of COX-2 inhibition. This will
allow us to move forward the development of novel prostaglandin-targeted
therapies both for existing indications such as treatment of arthritis in
patients with gastrointestinal compromise, as well as for emerging indications
including cancer chemoprevention.
Distribution of luciferase activity in tissue homogenates from
Cox2 mice.
Luciferase activity was determined quantitatively in homogenates of organs
from Cox2 reporter mice. As with
bioluminescent imaging data, luciferase assays of homogenates in the
presence of excess luciferin substrate confirmed the aorta (highlighted in
red) to be essentially devoid of Cox2 gene driven
expression, whereas relatively high expression levels were present in brain,
intestine and thymus. n=5. Luciferase activity was not determined (nd) in
blood or vas deferens.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Total and COX-1-dependent prostanoid production by aorta versus other
mouse tissues in wild type and Cox2
mice.
PGE2 formation, normalized to tissue mass, was measured by
immunoassay in supernatants of Ca2+ ionophore A23187
(50µM)-stimulated tissue segments from wild-type (a) and
Cox2mice (b). Prostanoid production
patterns in each genotype illustrate that although tissues possess a
variable amount of COX-2 activity, with the exception of the vas deferens,
COX-1 is the dominant activity present. n=6.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
COX-1 and COX-2-dependent prostacyclin release both by endothelium-intact
aorta and by endothelium-denuded aorta stimulated with a range of
activators.
Prostacyclin release, measured by enzyme immunoassay as
6-keto-PGF1α, was nearly abolished by Cox1
gene deletion, but not by Cox2 gene deletion, both in (a)
endothelium-intact and (b) endothelium-denuded aortic rings. Reduction in
6-keto-PGF1α production occurs both for basal release and for
release stimulated by a range of endothelial activators. Prostacyclin
release was attenuated by mechanical removal of the endothelium. n=6.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Simon Cuhlmann; Kim Van der Heiden; David Saliba; Jordi L Tremoleda; Magdy Khalil; Mustafa Zakkar; Hera Chaudhury; Le Anh Luong; Justin C Mason; Irina Udalova; William Gsell; Hazel Jones; Dorian O Haskard; Rob Krams; Paul C Evans Journal: Circ Res Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: C C Chan; S Boyce; C Brideau; S Charleson; W Cromlish; D Ethier; J Evans; A W Ford-Hutchinson; M J Forrest; J Y Gauthier; R Gordon; M Gresser; J Guay; S Kargman; B Kennedy; Y Leblanc; S Leger; J Mancini; G P O'Neill; M Ouellet; D Patrick; M D Percival; H Perrier; P Prasit; I Rodger Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: R Langenbach; S G Morham; H F Tiano; C D Loftin; B I Ghanayem; P C Chulada; J F Mahler; C A Lee; E H Goulding; K D Kluckman; H S Kim; O Smithies Journal: Cell Date: 1995-11-03 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Dairong Wang; Vickas V Patel; Emanuela Ricciotti; Rong Zhou; Mark D Levin; Ehre Gao; Zhou Yu; Victor A Ferrari; Min Min Lu; Junwang Xu; Hualei Zhang; Yiqun Hui; Yan Cheng; Nataliya Petrenko; Ying Yu; Garret A FitzGerald Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jane A Mitchell; Rebecca B Knowles; Nicholas S Kirkby; Daniel M Reed; Matthew L Edin; William E White; Melissa V Chan; Hilary Longhurst; Magdi M Yaqoob; Ginger L Milne; Darryl C Zeldin; Timothy D Warner Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Nicholas S Kirkby; Melissa V Chan; Anne K Zaiss; Eliana Garcia-Vaz; Jing Jiao; Lisa M Berglund; Elena F Verdu; Blerina Ahmetaj-Shala; John L Wallace; Harvey R Herschman; Maria F Gomez; Jane A Mitchell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anne K Zaiss; Johannes Zuber; Chun Chu; Hidevaldo B Machado; Jing Jiao; Arthur B Catapang; Tomo-o Ishikawa; Jose S Gil; Scott W Lowe; Harvey R Herschman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jane A Mitchell; Blerina Ahmetaj-Shala; Nicholas S Kirkby; William R Wright; Louise S Mackenzie; Daniel M Reed; Nura Mohamed Journal: Glob Cardiol Sci Pract Date: 2014-12-31
Authors: Nicholas S Kirkby; Martina H Lundberg; William R Wright; Timothy D Warner; Mark J Paul-Clark; Jane A Mitchell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Blerina Ahmetaj-Shala; Nicholas S Kirkby; Rebecca Knowles; Malak Al'Yamani; Sarah Mazi; Zhen Wang; Arthur T Tucker; Louise Mackenzie; Paul C J Armstrong; Rolf M Nüsing; James A P Tomlinson; Timothy D Warner; James Leiper; Jane A Mitchell Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David G Litvin; Scott J Denstaedt; Lauren F Borkowski; Nicole L Nichols; Thomas E Dick; Corey B Smith; Frank J Jacono Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 7.217