Literature DB >> 23873764

Alpha-fetoprotein and modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors progression after locoregional therapy as predictors of hepatocellular cancer recurrence and death after transplantation.

Quirino Lai1, Alfonso W Avolio, Ivo Graziadei, Gerd Otto, Massimo Rossi, Giuseppe Tisone, Pierre Goffette, Wolfgang Vogel, Michael B Pitton, Jan Lerut.   

Abstract

Locoregional therapy (LRT) is being increasingly used for the management of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in patients listed for liver transplantation (LT). Although several selection criteria have been developed, stratifications of survival according to the pathology of explanted livers and pre-LT LRT are lacking. Radiological progression according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) behavior was reviewed for 306 patients within the Milan criteria (MC-IN) and 116 patients outside the Milan criteria (MC-OUT) who underwent LRT and LT between January 1999 and March 2010. A prospectively collected database originating from 6 collaborating European centers was used for the study. Sixty-one patients (14.5%) developed HCC recurrence. For both MC-IN and MC-OUT patients, an AFP slope > 15 ng/mL/month and mRECIST progression were unique independent risk factors for HCC recurrence and patient death. When the radiological Milan criteria (MC) status was combined with radiological and biological progression, MC-IN and MC-OUT patients without risk factors had similarly excellent 5-year tumor-free and patient survival rates. MC-IN patients with at least 1 risk factor had worse outcomes, and MC-OUT patients with at least 1 risk factor had the poorest survival (P < 0.001). In conclusion, both radiological and biological modifications permit documentation of the response to LRT in patients waiting for LT. According to these 2 parameters, tumor progression significantly increases the risk of recurrence and patient death not only for MC-OUT patients but also for MC-IN patients. The monitoring of both parameters in combination with the initial radiological MC status is an essential element for further refining the selection criteria for potential liver recipients with HCC.
Copyright © 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873764     DOI: 10.1002/lt.23706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  58 in total

1.  Clinical validity of Metroticket calculator in transplant patients undergoing prior chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung-Don Kim; Gi-Won Song; Ju Hyun Shim; Seungbong Han; Jihyun An; Deok-Bog Moon; Kang Mo Kim; Young-Suk Lim; Gi-Young Ko; Shin Hwang; Han Chu Lee; Eunsil Yu; Kyu-Bo Sung; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  "Metroticket" predictor for assessing liver transplantation to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center analysis in mainland China.

Authors:  Jian-Yong Lei; Wen-Tao Wang; Lu-Nan Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: pushing to the limits?

Authors:  Quirino Lai; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09-14

4.  Bridging to liver transplantation patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: how worth is it?

Authors:  Angelo Sangiovanni; Massimo Colombo
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 5.  Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma biological behavior in patient selection for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Tommaso Giuliani; Marina Polacco; Luz Maria Herrero Manley; Gino Crivellari; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Twenty years of Milan criteria: the wicked flee though no one pursues.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Francesco Guerra; Quirino Lai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 7.  Contribution of alpha-fetoprotein in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bérénice Charrière; Charlotte Maulat; Bertrand Suc; Fabrice Muscari
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-28

Review 8.  Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maurizio Pompili; Giampiero Francica; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Roberto Iezzi; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Impact of pathological features of primary hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcomes of intrahepatic recurrence management: single center experience from Southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelwahab Ali; Wei-Feng Li; Jing-Houng Wang; Chih-Che Lin; Ying-Ju Chen; Ting-Lung Lin; Tsan-Shiun Lin; Sheng-Nan Lu; Chih-Chi Wang; Chao-Long Chen
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignancies: a new era of "Transplant Oncology" has begun.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Osamu Itano; Masahiro Shinoda; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.