Literature DB >> 23873493

Listening to your heart and feeling yourself: effects of exposure to interoceptive signals during the ultimatum game.

Bigna Lenggenhager1, Ruben T Azevedo, Alessandra Mancini, Salvatore Maria Aglioti.   

Abstract

The ultimatum game (UG) is commonly used to study the tension between financial self-interest and social equity motives. Here, we investigated whether experimental exposure to interoceptive signals influences participants' behavior in the UG. Participants were presented with various bodily sounds--i.e., their own heart, another person's heart, or the sound of footsteps--while acting both in the role of responder and proposer. We found that listening to one's own heart sound, compared to the other bodily sounds: (1) increased subjective feelings of unfairness, but not rejection behavior, in response to unfair offers and (2) increased the unfair offers while playing in the proposer role. These findings suggest that heightened feedback of one's own visceral processes may increase a self-centered perspective and drive socioeconomic exchanges accordingly. In addition, this study introduces a valuable procedure to manipulate online the access to interoceptive signals and for exploring the interplay between viscero-sensory information and cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873493     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3647-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Alan G Sanfey; James K Rilling; Jessica A Aronson; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  On the relationship between interoceptive awareness and the attentional processing of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Ellen Matthias; Rainer Schandry; Stefan Duschek; Olga Pollatos
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Just a heartbeat away from one's body: interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations.

Authors:  Manos Tsakiris; Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions.

Authors:  Laura Moretti; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-04

5.  Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Daria Knoch; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Kaspar Meyer; Valerie Treyer; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Heart beat perception and emotional experience.

Authors:  R Schandry
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Emotion expression in human punishment behavior.

Authors:  Erte Xiao; Daniel Houser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Heartbeat awareness and heart rate reactivity in anxiety sensitivity: a further investigation.

Authors:  S H Stewart; S E Buffett-Jerrott; R Kokaram
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Anxiety and decision-making.

Authors:  Catherine A Hartley; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Differential effects of anxiety and depression on interoceptive accuracy.

Authors:  Olga Pollatos; Eva Traut-Mattausch; Rainer Schandry
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

View more
  14 in total

1.  Reduced ownership over a virtual body modulates dishonesty.

Authors:  Marina Scattolin; Maria Serena Panasiti; Riccardo Villa; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  Interoceptive accuracy is related to the psychological mechanisms of the burning mouth syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Atsuo Yoshino; Naofumi Otsuru; Mitsuru Doi; Toru Maekawa; Takafumi Sasaoka; Shigeto Yamawaki
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 3.  Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review.

Authors:  Rebecca Brewer; Jennifer Murphy; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  When interoception helps to overcome negative feelings caused by social exclusion.

Authors:  Olga Pollatos; Ellen Matthias; Johannes Keller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Heartfelt empathy? No association between interoceptive awareness, questionnaire measures of empathy, reading the mind in the eyes task or the director task.

Authors:  Vivien Ainley; Lara Maister; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Right-wing authoritarianism and stereotype-driven expectations interact in shaping intergroup trust in one-shot vs multiple-round social interactions.

Authors:  Giorgia Ponsi; Maria Serena Panasiti; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Marco Tullio Liuzza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism.

Authors:  Richard M Piech; Daniela Strelchuk; Jake Knights; Jonathan V Hjälmheden; Jonas K Olofsson; Jane E Aspell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The calming effect of a new wearable device during the anticipation of public speech.

Authors:  Ruben T Azevedo; Nell Bennett; Andreas Bilicki; Jack Hooper; Fotini Markopoulou; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Participants' above-chance recognition of own-heart sound combined with poor metacognitive awareness suggests implicit knowledge of own heart cardiodynamics.

Authors:  Ruben T Azevedo; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Bigna Lenggenhager
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Error-related cardiac response as information for visibility judgements.

Authors:  Marta Łukowska; Michał Sznajder; Michał Wierzchoń
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.