BACKGROUND: Mitral valve (MV) enlargement is a compensatory mechanism capable of preventing functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in dilated ventricles. Total leaflet area and its relation with closure area measured by 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography have been related to FMR. Whether these parameters can be assessed with other imaging modalities is not known. Our objectives are to compare cardiac computed tomography (CT)-based measurements of MV leaflets with 3D echocardiography and determine the relationship of these metrics to the presence of FMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 2 cohorts of patients who had cardiac CT to measure MV total leaflet, closure, and annulus areas. In cohort 1 (26 patients), we validated these CT metrics to 3D echocardiography. In cohort 2 (66 patients), we assessed the relation of MV size with the presence of FMR in 3 populations: heart failure with FMR, heart failure without FMR, and normal controls. Cardiac CT and 3D echocardiography produced similar results for total leaflet (R(2)=0.97), closure (R(2)=0.89), and annulus areas (R(2)=0.84). MV size was the largest in heart failure without FMR compared with controls and patients with FMR (9.1 ± 1.7 versus 7.5 ± 1.0 versus 8.1 ± 0.9 cm(2)/m(2); P<0.01). Patients with FMR had reduced ratios of total leaflet to closure areas and total leaflet to annulus areas when compared with patients without FMR (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MV size measured by CT is comparable with 3D echocardiography. MV enlargement in cardiomyopathy suggests leaflet adaptation. Patients with FMR have inadequate adaptation as reflected by decreased ratios of leaflet area and areas determined by ventricle size (annulus and closure areas). These measurements provide additional insight into the mechanism of FMR.
BACKGROUND:Mitral valve (MV) enlargement is a compensatory mechanism capable of preventing functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in dilated ventricles. Total leaflet area and its relation with closure area measured by 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography have been related to FMR. Whether these parameters can be assessed with other imaging modalities is not known. Our objectives are to compare cardiac computed tomography (CT)-based measurements of MV leaflets with 3D echocardiography and determine the relationship of these metrics to the presence of FMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 2 cohorts of patients who had cardiac CT to measure MV total leaflet, closure, and annulus areas. In cohort 1 (26 patients), we validated these CT metrics to 3D echocardiography. In cohort 2 (66 patients), we assessed the relation of MV size with the presence of FMR in 3 populations: heart failure with FMR, heart failure without FMR, and normal controls. Cardiac CT and 3D echocardiography produced similar results for total leaflet (R(2)=0.97), closure (R(2)=0.89), and annulus areas (R(2)=0.84). MV size was the largest in heart failure without FMR compared with controls and patients with FMR (9.1 ± 1.7 versus 7.5 ± 1.0 versus 8.1 ± 0.9 cm(2)/m(2); P<0.01). Patients with FMR had reduced ratios of total leaflet to closure areas and total leaflet to annulus areas when compared with patients without FMR (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MV size measured by CT is comparable with 3D echocardiography. MV enlargement in cardiomyopathy suggests leaflet adaptation. Patients with FMR have inadequate adaptation as reflected by decreased ratios of leaflet area and areas determined by ventricle size (annulus and closure areas). These measurements provide additional insight into the mechanism of FMR.
Authors: William A Zoghbi; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Elyse Foster; Paul A Grayburn; Carol D Kraft; Robert A Levine; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Catherine M Otto; Miguel A Quinones; Harry Rakowski; William J Stewart; Alan Waggoner; Neil J Weissman Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Y Otsuji; M D Handschumacher; N Liel-Cohen; H Tanabe; L Jiang; E Schwammenthal; J L Guerrero; L A Nicholls; G J Vlahakes; R A Levine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A Carpentier; S Chauvaud; J N Fabiani; A Deloche; J Relland; A Lessana; C D'Allaines; P Blondeau; A Piwnica; C Dubost Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1980-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jonathan Afilalo; Julia Grapsa; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Jonathan Beaudoin; J Simon R Gibbs; Richard N Channick; David Langleben; Lawrence G Rudski; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Michael H Picard; Robert A Levine Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Philipp Blanke; Danny Dvir; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Robert A Levine; Bruce Precious; Adam Berger; Dion Stub; Cameron Hague; Darra Murphy; Christopher Thompson; Brad Munt; Robert Moss; Robert Boone; David Wood; Gregor Pache; John Webb; Jonathon Leipsic Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2014-10-07
Authors: Philipp E Bartko; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; J Luis Guerrero; Jonathan Beaudoin; Catherine Szymanski; Dae-Hee Kim; Margo M Seybolt; Mark D Handschumacher; Suzanne Sullivan; Michael L Garcia; James S Titus; Jill Wylie-Sears; Whitney S Irvin; Emmanuel Messas; Albert A Hagège; Alain Carpentier; Elena Aikawa; Joyce Bischoff; Robert A Levine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Elena Aikawa; Joyce Bischoff; J Luis Guerrero; Jesper Hjortnaes; Jonathan Beaudoin; Catherine Szymanski; Philipp E Bartko; Margo M Seybolt; Mark D Handschumacher; Suzanne Sullivan; Michael L Garcia; Adam Mauskapf; James S Titus; Jill Wylie-Sears; Whitney S Irvin; Miguel Chaput; Emmanuel Messas; Albert A Hagège; Alain Carpentier; Robert A Levine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sohum Kapadia; Amar Krishnaswamy; Habib Layoun; Brian P Griffin; Per Wierup; Paul Schoenhagen; Serge C Harb Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-02