Literature DB >> 23873357

Charlson score as a single pertinent criterion to select candidates for active surveillance among patients with small renal masses.

François Audenet1, Marie Audouin, Sarah J Drouin, Eva Comperat, Pierre Mozer, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Arnaud Méjean, Olivier Cussenot, Shahrokh F Shariat, Morgan Rouprêt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) of patients with small renal masses (SRMs) who would have been eligible for active surveillance (AS).
METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for 758 patients who underwent NSS over a 5-year period. Outcomes were assessed in two groups of patients who were eligible for AS according to different criteria. Group 1 criteria were as follows: age >75 years, renal mass ≤4 cm, significant comorbidities [Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) >2]. Group 2 criteria were as follows: any SRM ≤ 4 cm regardless of age, severe comorbidities with a 10-year mortality risk >50 % (CCI > 4). The two groups were not compared statistically because some patients were included in both.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (7.3 %) were included in Group 1 and 62 (8.2 %) in Group 2. There was a significant proportion of benign tumours in Group 1 (N = 6; 11 %) and Group 2 (N = 6; 10 %). Six (11 %) positive margins were observed in Group 1 and 8 (13 %) in Group 2. The 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100 and 77.4 %, respectively, in Group 1, and 88.5 and 79.6 % in Group 2. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 100 and 74.7 % in Group 1, and 96.7 and 78.1 % in Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with SRMs who would have been eligible for AS had no recurrence after initial tumour removal. In these patients, a CCI > 4 appeared to be a pertinent criterion to identify those patients less likely to benefit from immediate surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873357     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1131-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  29 in total

1.  Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysis.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Timsit; Jean-Philippe Bazin; Nicolas Thiounn; Eric Fontaine; Yves Chrétien; Bertrand Dufour; Arnaud Méjean
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Small renal mass.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Monish Aron; Debra A Gervais; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [Recommendations Onco-Urology 2010: Kidney cancer].

Authors:  J-J Patard; H Baumert; J-M Corréas; B Escudier; H Lang; J-A Long; Y Neuzillet; P Paparel; L Poissonnier; N Rioux-Leclercq; M Soulié
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.915

4.  Global increases in kidney cancer incidence, 1973-1992.

Authors:  A Mathew; S S Devesa; J F Fraumeni; W-H Chow
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Active treatment of localized renal tumors may not impact overall survival in patients aged 75 years or older.

Authors:  Brian R Lane; Robert Abouassaly; Tianming Gao; Christopher J Weight; Adrian V Hernandez; Benjamin T Larson; Jihad H Kaouk; Inderbir S Gill; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Impact of elective versus imperative indications on oncologic outcomes after open nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of sporadic renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Grégoire Coffin; Vincent Hupertan; Lionel Taksin; Christophe Vaessen; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Five-year survival after surgical treatment for kidney cancer: a population-based competing risk analysis.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Survival analysis of clear cell renal carcinoma according to the Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  Daniel Santos Arrontes; María Jesús Fernández Aceñero; Jesús Isidoro García González; Manuel Martín Muñoz; Pedro Paniagua Andrés
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Brian R Lane; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of imaging in the active surveillance of small renal masses.

Authors:  P G K Wagstaff; P J Zondervan; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [Watchful waiting and active surveillance of small renal masses].

Authors:  R Mager; S Frees; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.