Literature DB >> 21136181

Impact of elective versus imperative indications on oncologic outcomes after open nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of sporadic renal cell carcinomas.

Grégoire Coffin1, Vincent Hupertan, Lionel Taksin, Christophe Vaessen, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Marc-Olivier Bitker, Morgan Rouprêt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) on cancer control in renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and to compare the outcomes of patients who had elective versus imperative indications for surgery.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the data for patients treated with open NSS between 1980 and 2005 for sporadic RCCs. The following data were analyzed: age, intraoperative parameters, tumor size, Fuhrman grade, tumor, node, metastasis system disease stage, pathological data, and outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 155 patients with a median age of 60 years were included. The mean preoperative and postoperative creatinine levels were 1.1 ± 0.3 mg/dl (range 0.6-2.6 mg/dl) and 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dl (range 0.5-3.4 mg/dl), respectively. The mean tumor size was 3.8 ± 2 cm (range 1-10 cm). Margin status was positive in 15 cases (9.70%), and multifocal RCCs were observed in 36 patients (23.2%). Overall, NSS indications were elective in 96 cases (61.9%) and imperative in 59 cases (38.1%). Univariate analysis found that elective cases were associated with better perioperative outcomes (P = 0.01). In univariate analysis, tumor, node, metastasis system disease stage, multifocality, and indication were associated with recurrence (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, only multifocality status and imperatives indications were significant (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 118.2 ± 151 months. The 5- and 10-year tumor-free survival rates were 81.8% and 78.7% in elective and imperatives cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Oncologic control seems to be better for cases of elective open NSS. Thus, NSS should be advocated as soon as it is technically possible, regardless of the size of the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136181     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1457-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  7 in total

1.  Charlson score as a single pertinent criterion to select candidates for active surveillance among patients with small renal masses.

Authors:  François Audenet; Marie Audouin; Sarah J Drouin; Eva Comperat; Pierre Mozer; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Arnaud Méjean; Olivier Cussenot; Shahrokh F Shariat; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Positive surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgery: risk factors and therapeutic consequences.

Authors:  Julie Steinestel; Sandra Steffens; Konrad Steinestel; Andres Jan Schrader
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Ultrasound-guided open nephron sparing surgery without renal artery occlusion for central renal tumors.

Authors:  Dian Fu; Ping Li; Feng Xu; Feng Tian; Xiao-Feng Xu; Zhi-Feng Wei; Zheng-Yu Zhang; Jing-Ping Ge; Wen Cheng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-03

4.  Perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Does indication matter?

Authors:  Vivek Venkatramani; Santosh Kumar; J Chandrasingh; Antony Devasia; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  Positive surgical margins may not affect the survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy: A meta-analysis based on 39 studies.

Authors:  Renran Bai; Liang Gao; Jiawu Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Comparison of the trifecta outcomes of robotic and open nephron-sparing surgeries performed in the robotic era of a single institution.

Authors:  Ömer Acar; Esin Öztürk Işık; Tuna Mut; Yeşim Sağlıcan; Aslıhan Onay; Metin Vural; Ahmet Musaoğlu; Tarık Esen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-09-04

7.  Survival advantage of partial over radical nephrectomy in patients presenting with localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Frederik C Roos; Sandra Steffens; Kerstin Junker; Martin Janssen; Frank Becker; Gerd Wegener; Walburgis Brenner; Julie Steinestel; Thomas J Schnoeller; Mark Schrader; Rainer Hofmann; Joachim W Thüroff; Markus A Kuczyk; Heiko Wunderlich; Stefan Siemer; Arndt Hartmann; Michael Stöckle; Andres J Schrader
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.