OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to evaluate the predictability of preoperative tumour bone invasion of the mandible by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity using CT, cone-beam CT and bone scintigraphy with SPECT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients who had received CT, SPECT or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), as well as a further 48 patients who undergone all these investigations for preoperative evaluation of bone invasion were included in the study. A case-control analysis and the receiver operating characteristics were performed. Histological results of bone specimens served as the gold standard for assessment of bone invasion. RESULTS: CBCT and SPECT showed a comparable sensitivity for bone invasion (93 % [CI 0.816-0.972] and 96 % [CI 0.867-0.990], respectively) which was significantly higher than that of CT (63 % [CI 0.488-0.752]). Further, CBCT obtained higher specificity than SPECT (62 % [CI 0.478-0.743] and 48 % [CI 0.342-0.614], respectively), whereas CT showed the best specificity among the investigation methods (81 % [CI 0.677-0.896]). CONCLUSIONS: CT scan provides by its high specificity and positive predictive value a precise imaging technique for clinical routine. However, CBCT shows a much higher sensitivity for cortical bone invasion and a better negative predictive value. With a significantly lower exposure dose it can rule out this invasion effectively and prevent overtreatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the high-resolution images delivered by CBCT along with minimized artefacts in the mandible it provides an alternative imaging technique, which could be combined and accomplished with another soft-tissue imaging modality like MRI to obtain optimal hard and soft-tissue visualisation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to evaluate the predictability of preoperative tumour bone invasion of the mandible by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity using CT, cone-beam CT and bone scintigraphy with SPECT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients who had received CT, SPECT or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), as well as a further 48 patients who undergone all these investigations for preoperative evaluation of bone invasion were included in the study. A case-control analysis and the receiver operating characteristics were performed. Histological results of bone specimens served as the gold standard for assessment of bone invasion. RESULTS: CBCT and SPECT showed a comparable sensitivity for bone invasion (93 % [CI 0.816-0.972] and 96 % [CI 0.867-0.990], respectively) which was significantly higher than that of CT (63 % [CI 0.488-0.752]). Further, CBCT obtained higher specificity than SPECT (62 % [CI 0.478-0.743] and 48 % [CI 0.342-0.614], respectively), whereas CT showed the best specificity among the investigation methods (81 % [CI 0.677-0.896]). CONCLUSIONS: CT scan provides by its high specificity and positive predictive value a precise imaging technique for clinical routine. However, CBCT shows a much higher sensitivity for cortical bone invasion and a better negative predictive value. With a significantly lower exposure dose it can rule out this invasion effectively and prevent overtreatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the high-resolution images delivered by CBCT along with minimized artefacts in the mandible it provides an alternative imaging technique, which could be combined and accomplished with another soft-tissue imaging modality like MRI to obtain optimal hard and soft-tissue visualisation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Authors: E Nakayama; K Yoshiura; K Yuasa; O Tabata; K Araki; S Kanda; S Ozeki; M Shinohara Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: M Loubele; R Jacobs; F Maes; F Schutyser; D Debaveye; R Bogaerts; W Coudyzer; D Vandermeulen; J van Cleynenbreugel; G Marchal; P Suetens Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2006-02-03 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Timo Dreiseidler; Nuri Alarabi; Lutz Ritter; Daniel Rothamel; Martin Scheer; Joachim E Zöller; Robert A Mischkowski Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2011-07-20
Authors: Changsheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; Song Luo; Hongyuan Shi; Lin Li; Ling Zheng; Long Jiang Zhang; Guangming Lu Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Simon N Rogers; John Devine; Derek Lowe; Parminder Shokar; James S Brown; E David Vaugman Journal: Head Neck Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Mario Fernando Muñoz Guerra; Francisco J Rodríguez Campo; Luis Naval Gías; Jesús Sastre Pérez Journal: Head Neck Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: G Tirelli; S Zacchigna; F Boscolo Nata; E Quatela; R Di Lenarda; M Piovesana Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 2.503