Literature DB >> 23873323

Imaging of mandible invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma using computed tomography, cone-beam computed tomography and bone scintigraphy with SPECT.

Samer G Hakim1, Henning Wieker, Thomas Trenkle, Peter Sieg, Jens Konitzer, Konstanze Holl-Ulrich, Hans-Christian Jacobsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to evaluate the predictability of preoperative tumour bone invasion of the mandible by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity using CT, cone-beam CT and bone scintigraphy with SPECT.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients who had received CT, SPECT or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), as well as a further 48 patients who undergone all these investigations for preoperative evaluation of bone invasion were included in the study. A case-control analysis and the receiver operating characteristics were performed. Histological results of bone specimens served as the gold standard for assessment of bone invasion.
RESULTS: CBCT and SPECT showed a comparable sensitivity for bone invasion (93 % [CI 0.816-0.972] and 96 % [CI 0.867-0.990], respectively) which was significantly higher than that of CT (63 % [CI 0.488-0.752]). Further, CBCT obtained higher specificity than SPECT (62 % [CI 0.478-0.743] and 48 % [CI 0.342-0.614], respectively), whereas CT showed the best specificity among the investigation methods (81 % [CI 0.677-0.896]).
CONCLUSIONS: CT scan provides by its high specificity and positive predictive value a precise imaging technique for clinical routine. However, CBCT shows a much higher sensitivity for cortical bone invasion and a better negative predictive value. With a significantly lower exposure dose it can rule out this invasion effectively and prevent overtreatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the high-resolution images delivered by CBCT along with minimized artefacts in the mandible it provides an alternative imaging technique, which could be combined and accomplished with another soft-tissue imaging modality like MRI to obtain optimal hard and soft-tissue visualisation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873323     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1042-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  37 in total

1.  Detection of bone invasion by gingival carcinoma of the mandible: a comparison of intraoral and panoramic radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  E Nakayama; K Yoshiura; K Yuasa; O Tabata; K Araki; S Kanda; S Ozeki; M Shinohara
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Can magnetic resonance imaging replace single photon computed tomography and computed tomography in detecting bony invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Arumugam Rajesh; Arshad Khan; Charles Kendall; Jonathan Hayter; Graham Cherryman
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning.

Authors:  M Loubele; R Jacobs; F Maes; F Schutyser; D Debaveye; R Bogaerts; W Coudyzer; D Vandermeulen; J van Cleynenbreugel; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman; Predag Sukovic
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  A comparison of multislice computerized tomography, cone-beam computerized tomography, and single photon emission computerized tomography for the assessment of bone invasion by oral malignancies.

Authors:  Timo Dreiseidler; Nuri Alarabi; Lutz Ritter; Daniel Rothamel; Martin Scheer; Joachim E Zöller; Robert A Mischkowski
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2011-07-20

6.  Monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT reduces artifacts from implanted metal orthopedic devices in patients with factures.

Authors:  Changsheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; Song Luo; Hongyuan Shi; Lin Li; Ling Zheng; Long Jiang Zhang; Guangming Lu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Factors that influence the method of mandibular resection in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J S Brown; N Kalavrezos; J D'Souza; D Lowe; P Magennis; J A Woolgar
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.651

8.  Longitudinal health-related quality of life after mandibular resection for oral cancer: a comparison between rim and segment.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; John Devine; Derek Lowe; Parminder Shokar; James S Brown; E David Vaugman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Rim versus sagittal mandibulectomy for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma: two types of mandibular preservation.

Authors:  Mario Fernando Muñoz Guerra; Francisco J Rodríguez Campo; Luis Naval Gías; Jesús Sastre Pérez
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  How accurate are the fusion of cone-beam CT and 3-D stereophotographic images?

Authors:  Yasas S N Jayaratne; Colman P J McGrath; Roger A Zwahlen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of the Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Detection of Bone Invasion in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gian Paolo Bombeccari; Valentina Candotto; Aldo Bruno Giannì; Francesco Carinci; Francesco Spadari
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2019-10

Review 2.  Will the mininvasive approach challenge the old paradigms in oral cancer surgery?

Authors:  G Tirelli; S Zacchigna; F Boscolo Nata; E Quatela; R Di Lenarda; M Piovesana
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.