Literature DB >> 23872110

Surgical outcomes and national comprehensive cancer network compliance in advanced ovarian cancer surgery in a low volume military treatment facility.

Neil T Phippen1, Jason C Barnett, William J Lowery, Caela R Miller, Charles A Leath.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal cytoreduction (OPT) rate, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guideline compliance rate and patient outcomes for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients at our low volume institution.
METHODS: Following IRB approval, records of patients with Stage III-IV EOC, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma completing both primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic variables, cytoreduction status (optimal or suboptimal), NCCN treatment guideline compliance, and survival were reviewed. Standard statistical tests including the t-test, Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier Survival curves were utilized.
RESULTS: Overall, 48 patients met all inclusion criteria. 35(73%) and 13 (27%) achieved optimal and suboptimal cytoreduction, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 37.1 months (95% CI 23.2 - 51.1 months) and NCCN treatment guideline compliance was 85.4%. Compared to sub-optimally cytoreduced patients the optimally cytoreduced patients were significantly older (62.2 vs. 53.5 yrs; p=0.015); no other significant clinicopathologic differences were observed between the two groups. 19 of 48 (39.6%) patients enrolled in an upfront cooperative group trial. Median OS was 43.4 months for optimally compared to 15.6 months in sub-optimally cytoreduced patients (p=0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: NCCN treatment guideline compliance, OPT, and median OS rates in our low volume institution are similar to those reported nationally, and argue against using volume alone as a rationale for centralization of care.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer care disparities; Centralization of care; Epithelial ovarian cancer; NCCN guidelines; Surgical cytoreduction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872110     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

1.  Impact of National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Centers on ovarian cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Belinda Campos; Leo R Chavez; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Is It Time to Centralize Ovarian Cancer Care in the United States?

Authors:  Renee A Cowan; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Ginger J Gardner; Douglas A Levine; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; William P Tew; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hebert A Vargas Alvarez; Debra M Sarasohn; Svetlana Mironov; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Triple Synchronous Malignancies in Genital Tract; Primary Endometrial, Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ozgur Kan; Aysegul Alkilic; Batuhan Turgay; Ali Gemici; Cem Somer Atabekoglu
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

4.  Trends and factors associated with radical cytoreductive surgery in the United States: A case for centralized care.

Authors:  A K Sinno; X Li; R E Thompson; E J Tanner; K L Levinson; R L Stone; S M Temkin; A N Fader; D S Chi; K Long Roche
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Ovarian cancer in the United States: contemporary patterns of care associated with improved survival.

Authors:  William A Cliby; Matthew A Powell; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; J Philip Miller; Phillip Y Roland; David G Mutch; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Observed-to-expected ratio for adherence to treatment guidelines as a quality of care indicator for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Valerie B Galvan-Turner; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Compliance to treatment guidelines and survival in women undergoing interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Thumkur S Shylasree; Abhay K Kattepur; Monisha Gupta; Jaya Ghosh; Amita Maheshwari; Jyoti Bajpai; Rohini Hawaldar; Seema Gulia; Kedar Deodhar; Palak Popat; Sudeep Gupta; Rajendra A Kerkar
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-10-03

8.  Reasons for failure to deliver National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-adherent care in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer at an NCCN cancer center.

Authors:  Britt K Erickson; Jovana Y Martin; Monjri M Shah; J Michael Straughn; Charles A Leath
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Being treated in higher volume hospitals leads to longer progression-free survival for epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients in the Rhone-Alpes region of France.

Authors:  Marius Huguet; Lionel Perrier; Olivia Bally; David Benayoun; Pierre De Saint Hilaire; Dominique Beal Ardisson; Magali Morelle; Nathalie Havet; Xavier Joutard; Pierre Meeus; Philippe Gabelle; Jocelyne Provençal; Céline Chauleur; Olivier Glehen; Amandine Charreton; Fadila Farsi; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Impact of Provider Volume on Outcomes of Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Catherine Ireland; Eric Wiedower; Muhammad Mirza; Melissa Crawley; Alexandria Tran; George Yaghmour; Mike G Martin
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2018-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.