Literature DB >> 23871094

High-definition endoscopy with i-Scan for evaluation of small colon polyps: the HiSCOPE study.

Peter John Basford1, Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton1, Bernie Higgins2, Pradeep Bhandari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional white-light endoscopy cannot reliably distinguish between small (<10 mm) adenomatous and hyperplastic colon polyps. High-definition white-light (HDWL) endoscopy and i-Scan may improve in vivo characterization of small colon polyps.
OBJECTIVE: To compare HDWL endoscopy and HDWL plus i-Scan for the assessment of small colon polyps and to measure performance against the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) thresholds for assessment of diminutive colon polyps.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Single academic hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing bowel cancer screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: In vivo assessment of all polyps <10 mm by using HDWL and i-Scan image enhancement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was overall diagnostic accuracy of in vivo assessment of colon polyps <10 mm. Secondary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity for adenomatous histology, negative predictive value for adenomatous histology of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps, and accuracy of prediction of polyp surveillance intervals.
RESULTS: A total of 209 polyps in 84 patients were included. There were no significant differences between HDWL endoscopy and i-Scan in characterization of polyps <10 mm (accuracy 93.3% vs 94.7%; P = 1.00; sensitivity 95.5% vs 97.0%; P = .50; specificity 89.3% vs 90.7%; P = 1.00). The negative predictive value for adenomatous histology of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps was 100% with both HDWL endoscopy and i-Scan. U.K. and U.S. polyp surveillance intervals were predicted with 95.2% accuracy with HDWL endoscopy and 97.2% accuracy with i-Scan. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study.
CONCLUSION: HDWL endoscopy may be as accurate as HDWL with i-Scan image enhancement for the in vivo characterization of small colon polyps. Both modalities fulfil the ASGE performance thresholds for the assessment of diminutive colon polyps. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01761279.).
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGA; ASGE; American Gastroenterological Association; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; BSG; British Society of Gastroenterology; CE; DCP; FICE; Fujinon intelligent color enhancement; HD; HDWL; NBI; PIVI; Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Interventions; SCP; SE; TE; contrast enhancement; diminutive colon polyp; high-definition; high-definition white-light; narrow-band imaging; small colon polyp; surface enhancement; tone enhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23871094     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  22 in total

1.  Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.

Authors:  Karl M Langberg; Neil D Parikh; Yanhong Deng; Maria Ciarlegio; Loren Laine; Harry R Aslanian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

2.  The Role of Chromoendoscopy in Evaluating Colorectal Dysplasia.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-06

3.  Colonic lesion characterisation skills among UK endoscopists and the impact of a brief training intervention.

Authors:  P Basford; G Longcroft-Wheaton; Reiji Higashi; Toshio Uraoka; P Bhandari
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 4.  Electronic chromo-endoscopy: technical details and a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Partha Pal; Aniruddha Pratap Singh; Navya D Kanuri; Rupa Banerjee
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Detection and characterization of colorectal polyps using high-definition white light and i-Scan: Evidence-based consensus recommendations using a modified Delphi process.

Authors:  Pradeep Bhandari; Sreedhari Thayalasekaran; Ralf Keisslich; Raf Bisschops; Arthur Hoffmann; Rehan Haidry; Jose Esteban; Bartolomé López Viedma; Elina Godzhello; Majid Almadi; Helmut Neumann; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  A roadmap for the clinical implementation of optical-imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Dale J Waterhouse; Catherine R M Fitzpatrick; Brian W Pogue; James P B O'Connor; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 29.234

7.  High Definition Colonoscopy Combined with i-SCAN Imaging Technology Is Superior in the Detection of Adenomas and Advanced Lesions Compared to High Definition Colonoscopy Alone.

Authors:  Erik A Bowman; Patrick R Pfau; Arnab Mitra; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal; Benjamin S Hall; Mark E Benson
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2015-06-18

8.  Accuracy of i-Scan for Optical Diagnosis of Colonic Polyps: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chuan-Guo Guo; Rui Ji; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Advanced Endoscopic Imaging in Colonic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Timo Rath; Nadine Morgenstern; Francesco Vitali; Raja Atreya; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-01-21

10.  Leaving colorectal polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy using blue light imaging (BLI).

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Helmut Neumann Sen; Michael Vieth; Raf Bisschops; Florian Thieringer; Khan F Rahman; Thomas Gamstätter; Gian Eugenio Tontini; Peter R Galle
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.