Literature DB >> 23868479

Outpatient colonoscopy complications in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: a prospective analysis.

Georgina Castro1, M Fuad Azrak, Laura C Seeff, Janet Royalty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To the authors's knowledge, there are few published prospective cohort studies of colonoscopy complications in patients at average risk for colorectal cancer who received colorectal cancer screening from a community-based program. In this article, the authors report the rate of colonoscopy complications in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP), which provided colorectal cancer screening to a medically underserved population aged 50 years to 64 years for screening, diagnostic follow-up after positive stool blood tests, and surveillance purposes.
METHODS: Clinical data were collected prospectively from 5 community-based colorectal cancer screening programs. Complications were identified by reviewing the standardized clinical data and medical complication reporting forms submitted by the programs to the CDC. Serious complications were defined as conditions or symptoms that resulted in hospital admission within 30 days after the procedure, including perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding requiring or not requiring blood transfusion, cardiopulmonary events, postpolypectomy syndrome, excessive abdominal pain, or death.
RESULTS: A total of 3215 individuals underwent 3355 colonoscopies. Of these, 89% of the colonoscopies were conducted for screening, 9% were conducted for diagnostic follow-up, and 2% were conducted for surveillance purposes. The mean age of the individuals was 55.9 years. Eight individuals experienced serious complications, for an incidence of 2.38 per 1000 colonoscopies. Three patients experienced bowel perforations that required surgery, 1 patient was hospitalized for postpolypectomy bleeding, 3 patients experienced cardiopulmonary events, and 1 patient visited the emergency room for excessive abdominal pain and underwent surgery for an identified colorectal mass. No deaths were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: In the CDC's CRCSDP, in which a total of 3215 individuals underwent 3355 colonoscopies, the overall incidence of serious complications from colonoscopy was found to be low.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; complications; perforation; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868479     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Jürgen F Riemann; Thomas Seufferlein; Max Reinshagen; Stephan Hollerbach; Ulrike Haug; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Madeleine Ritter-Herschbach; Patrick Jahn; Thomas Frese; Michael Harris; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Stray energy transfer during endoscopy.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Amin Madani; Douglas M Overbey; Asimina Kiourti; Satheesh Bojja-Venkatakrishnan; Dean J Mikami; Jeffrey W Hazey; Todd R Arcomano; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Complication Rates in Colonoscopy Screening for Cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Zwink; Bernd Holleczek; Christa Stegmaier; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Familial colorectal cancer screening: When and what to do?

Authors:  Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Omero Alessandro Paoluzi; Pierpaolo Sileri; Piero Rossi; Giuseppe Sica; Francesco Pallone
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Iatrogenic Rectal Perforation.

Authors:  Malte Zumblick; Petros Stathopoulos; Thomas Mathias Gress; Ulrike Walburga Denzer
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Analysis of the Characteristics of Colonoscopy Perforation and Risk Factors for Failure of Endoscopic Treatment.

Authors:  Zhi Jiehua; Ali Kashif; Che YaoSheng; Sun YunYun; Liang Lanyu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-05

7.  Developmental milestones across the programmatic life cycle: implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.

Authors:  Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Amy DeGroff; Elizabeth A Rohan; Judith Preissle; Jennifer E Boehm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The concentrations of EGFR, LRG1, ITIH4, and F5 in serum correlate with the number of colonic adenomas in ApcPirc/+ rats.

Authors:  Melanie M Ivancic; Amy A Irving; Kelli G Jonakin; William F Dove; Michael R Sussman
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-09-08

9.  Does "July effect" exist in colonoscopies performed at teaching hospitals?

Authors:  Rupak Desai; Upenkumar Patel; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-05-17

Review 10.  What Influences the Quality of Prevention Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Wolfgang Schmidt-Tänzer; Axel Eickhoff
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.