BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest low rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in clinical practice. There is little information on the provider- and healthcare-facility-related factors that explain the use of HCC screening. AIMS: We used data from the 2007 Survey to Assess Hepatitis C Care in Veterans Health Administration that collected information regarding the care of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) from 138 of 140 Veterans Administration healthcare facilities nationwide. METHODS: All providers caring for veterans with HCV were invited to respond. In addition, each facility was asked to identify a lead HCV clinician to respond to facility-specific questions. Our outcome was a response concordant with HCC screening guidelines [HCC screening in patients with cirrhosis or in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), and screening every 6 or 12 months]. RESULTS: A total of 268 providers responded (98 % facility participation rate). Of these, 190 respondents (70.9 %) reported recommending HCC screening with guideline-concordant risk groups and frequency. Providers reporting guideline-concordant HCC screening practices were significantly more likely to have expertise in liver disease (MD, gastroenterologists or hepatologists), routinely screen for varices, prescribe HCV treatment, and refer or manage patients with liver transplant. The availability of HCC-specific treatments on site was the main facility factor associated with guideline-concordant HCC screening. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported rates of guideline-concordant HCC screening are considerably higher than those seen in routine VA practice. Provider expertise in liver disease and the perceived availability of HCC treatment including transplantation in the local facility are important factors driving self-reported HCC screening practices.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest low rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in clinical practice. There is little information on the provider- and healthcare-facility-related factors that explain the use of HCC screening. AIMS: We used data from the 2007 Survey to Assess Hepatitis C Care in Veterans Health Administration that collected information regarding the care of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) from 138 of 140 Veterans Administration healthcare facilities nationwide. METHODS: All providers caring for veterans with HCV were invited to respond. In addition, each facility was asked to identify a lead HCV clinician to respond to facility-specific questions. Our outcome was a response concordant with HCC screening guidelines [HCC screening in patients with cirrhosis or in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), and screening every 6 or 12 months]. RESULTS: A total of 268 providers responded (98 % facility participation rate). Of these, 190 respondents (70.9 %) reported recommending HCC screening with guideline-concordant risk groups and frequency. Providers reporting guideline-concordant HCC screening practices were significantly more likely to have expertise in liver disease (MD, gastroenterologists or hepatologists), routinely screen for varices, prescribe HCV treatment, and refer or manage patients with liver transplant. The availability of HCC-specific treatments on site was the main facility factor associated with guideline-concordant HCC screening. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported rates of guideline-concordant HCC screening are considerably higher than those seen in routine VA practice. Provider expertise in liver disease and the perceived availability of HCC treatment including transplantation in the local facility are important factors driving self-reported HCC screening practices.
Authors: Fasiha Kanwal; Tuyen Hoang; Jennifer R Kramer; Steven M Asch; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Angelique Zeringue; Peter Richardson; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Erik J Van Kleek; Jonathan M Schwartz; Stephen C Rayhill; Hugo R Rosen; Scott J Cotler Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Amit G Singal; Adam Yopp; Celette S Skinner; Milton Packer; William M Lee; Jasmin A Tiro Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gregory L Armstrong; Annemarie Wasley; Edgar P Simard; Geraldine M McQuillan; Wendi L Kuhnert; Miriam J Alter Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Louise Henderson; Jennifer R Kramer; Fasiha Kanwal; Peter A Richardson; Zhigang Duan; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carrie R Wong; Ruel T Garcia; Huy N Trinh; Khoa D Lam; Nghi B Ha; Huy A Nguyen; Khanh K Nguyen; Brian S Levitt; Mindie H Nguyen Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Ju Dong Yang; Hager Ahmed Mohammed; William S Harmsen; Felicity Enders; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Marina Serper; David E Kaplan; Justine Shults; Peter P Reese; Lauren A Beste; Tamar H Taddei; Rachel M Werner Journal: Hepatology Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Christina Wang; Vincent Chen; Vinh Vu; An Le; Linda Nguyen; Changqing Zhao; Carrie R Wong; Nghia Nguyen; Jiayi Li; Jian Zhang; Huy Trinh; Mindie H Nguyen Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Sally Ann Tran; An Le; Changqing Zhao; Joseph Hoang; Lee Ann Yasukawa; Susan Weber; Linda Henry; Mindie H Nguyen Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2018-03-20