Literature DB >> 23867032

Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them.

Russell E Glasgow1, William T Riley.   

Abstract

Pragmatic measures are important to facilitate implementation and dissemination, address stakeholder issues, and drive quality improvement. This paper proposes necessary and recommended criteria for pragmatic measures, provides examples of projects to develop and identify such measures, addresses potential concerns about these recommendations, and identifies areas for future research and application. Key criteria for pragmatic measures include importance to stakeholders in addition to researchers, low burden, broad applicability, sensitivity to change, and being actionable. Examples of pragmatic measures are provided, including ones for different settings (e.g., primary care, hospital) and levels (e.g., individual, practitioner, setting) that illustrate approaches to produce broad-scale dissemination and the development of brief, standardized measures for use in pragmatic studies. There is an important need for pragmatic measures to facilitate pragmatic research, guide quality improvement, and inform progress on public health goals, but few examples are currently available. Development and evaluation of pragmatic measures and metrics would provide useful resources to advance science, policy, and practice.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of Medicine.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23867032     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  94 in total

1.  Motivation and attitudes toward changing health (MATCH): A new patient-reported measure to inform clinical conversations.

Authors:  Danielle M Hessler; L Fisher; W H Polonsky; V Bowyer; M Potter
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.852

2.  Incorporating PROMIS Symptom Measures into Primary Care Practice-a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Tasneem L Talib; Timothy E Stump; Jacob Kean; David A Haggstrom; Paige DeChant; Kittie R Lake; Madison Stout; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Knowledge of Evidence-Based Services Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Short Form.

Authors:  Gwendolyn M Lawson; Tyler M Moore; Kelsie H Okamura; Emily M Becker-Haimes; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-07

Review 4.  Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Patrick O Monahan; Jacob Kean
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Free, brief, and validated: Standardized instruments for low-resource mental health settings.

Authors:  Rinad S Beidas; Rebecca E Stewart; Lucia Walsh; Steven Lucas; Margaret Mary Downey; Kamilah Jackson; Tara Fernandez; David S Mandell
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2015-02-01

6.  What Therapy Practices Do Providers Value in Youth Behavioral Health? A Measure Development Study.

Authors:  Charmaine K Higa-McMillan; Chad Ebesutani; Cameo F Stanick
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 7.  Advancing Evidence-Based Assessment in School Mental Health: Key Priorities for an Applied Research Agenda.

Authors:  Prerna G Arora; Elizabeth H Connors; Melissa W George; Aaron R Lyon; Courtney B Wolk; Mark D Weist
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Intentional research design in implementation science: implications for the use of nomothetic and idiographic assessment.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Elizabeth Connors; Amanda Jensen-Doss; Sara J Landes; Cara C Lewis; Bryce D McLeod; Christopher Rutt; Cameo Stanick; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Behavioral and Social Sciences at the National Institutes of Health: adoption of research findings in health research and practice as a scientific priority.

Authors:  William T Riley
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  The Humble Leader: Association of Discrepancies in Leader and Follower Ratings of Implementation Leadership With Organizational Climate in Mental Health.

Authors:  Gregory A Aarons; Mark G Ehrhart; Elisa M Torres; Natalie K Finn; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.